Consolidated Marijuana Regulation Act [Law'd] (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 06:13:47 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  Consolidated Marijuana Regulation Act [Law'd] (search mode)
Pages: [1] 2
Author Topic: Consolidated Marijuana Regulation Act [Law'd]  (Read 8921 times)
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« on: January 16, 2012, 08:57:29 AM »
« edited: January 16, 2012, 02:20:54 PM by No Good Napoleon »
I object to the age restriction.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #1 on: January 16, 2012, 01:04:09 PM »

Do you have something to say?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #2 on: January 16, 2012, 01:12:43 PM »

Two amendments, as shown above.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #3 on: January 16, 2012, 01:15:04 PM »
Amendment to remove clause 3 from Section 2.
Amendment to remove clause 4 from Section 2.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #4 on: January 16, 2012, 02:20:03 PM »
I stand for regional rights and do not support forcing regions to abide by arbitrary and impractical age restrictions.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #5 on: January 16, 2012, 02:29:08 PM »
Quote from: Tmthforu94 on January 16, 2012, 02:27:15 PM
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 16, 2012, 02:20:03 PM
I stand for regional rights and do not support forcing regions to abide by arbitrary and impractical age restrictions.


If you stand for regional rights, then I assume you oppose legalization of marijuana on the federal level? I'm merely asking out of interest.

Assume what you want. It seems most people like to make assumptions.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #6 on: January 16, 2012, 02:54:34 PM »
I would not support any age restrictions at the federal level. I don't have an objection to your amendment.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #7 on: January 16, 2012, 03:04:28 PM »
You did not ask me anything. You stated your own opinions and followed it with a question mark. That doesn't mean you're asking a question.


Regardless, I don't know what that has to do with this debate. I've stated my positions on this bill very clearly.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #8 on: January 16, 2012, 04:27:17 PM »
« Edited: January 16, 2012, 04:40:22 PM by No Good Napoleon »
So, what makes marijuana different from alcohol necessitating an age restriction? The Older Sibling Lobby must be throwing the cash around crazy.

I've already given my reasons for objecting to an amendment that no one has been able to explain the necessity of.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #9 on: January 16, 2012, 07:53:14 PM »
Nay.

Alcohol age restrictions are left up to the regions. We ought to be consistent.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #10 on: January 16, 2012, 08:02:22 PM »
Quote from: Mad Marokai, PPT on January 16, 2012, 07:53:37 PM
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 16, 2012, 01:15:04 PM
Amendment to remove clause 3 from Section 2.
Amendment to remove clause 4 from Section 2.

I'm interpreting these as one single amendment, and objecting. We'll vote on them after we vote on the next amendment (Junkie's) since this is apparently going to be a fun bill!

They are two separate amendments, bud.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #11 on: January 16, 2012, 08:12:08 PM »
They must be two separate amendments so that the chances of passage aren't tied to each other. You know that though, so stop playing games.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #12 on: January 17, 2012, 12:44:22 AM »
Quote from: Mad Marokai, PPT on January 17, 2012, 12:41:40 AM
Quote from: TJ in Cleve on January 17, 2012, 12:14:44 AM
Nay

I refuse to support a nation mandate that marijuana must be legalized in all regions and further refuse to support mandating no older than 18 as the age limit. This amendment only strengthens the limitations on what regions may outlaw, therefore I oppose it.

At least your position is consistent.

Consistent is keeping age restrictions up to the regions as we do with alcohol.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #13 on: January 20, 2012, 09:06:56 PM »
Aye
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #14 on: January 21, 2012, 01:01:17 AM »

No
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #15 on: January 21, 2012, 02:37:24 PM »

What is your point? That was a completely different amendment.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #16 on: January 21, 2012, 02:52:07 PM »
Right, change my vote to Nay.

It should have been obvious to the PPT that Junkie was only trying to add one word.

If you have a point, make it next time. I don't like playing games.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #17 on: January 21, 2012, 06:01:39 PM »
Quote from: Junkie on January 21, 2012, 06:00:07 PM
Add the word transportation to that and I agree

What made you change your mind, if I may?
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #18 on: January 22, 2012, 04:16:30 AM »
Quote from: Mad Marokai, PPT on January 21, 2012, 08:31:52 PM
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 21, 2012, 02:52:07 PM
Right, change my vote to Nay.

It should have been obvious to the PPT that Junkie was only trying to add one word.

If you have a point, make it next time. I don't like playing games.

It's okay, Napoleon. I just assumed you were high again.

You're mature.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #19 on: January 24, 2012, 04:57:30 AM »
Quote from: Mad Marokai, PPT on January 22, 2012, 09:44:02 PM
Quote from: Tmthforu94 on January 22, 2012, 08:21:28 PM
So its Marokais fault for not being able to get inside Junkies head and assume his amendment referred only to transportation, and not the age restriction too? Uh...no need to play blame game.

I'm not telepathic, so shame on me.

You're willing to count votes while merely "assuming" there is a given number of Senators at the time, but you can't assume the bolder text in an offered amendment is the proposed change? Wow.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #20 on: January 24, 2012, 05:50:33 AM »
Two different changes deserve two different votes. It doesn't take a genius to figure that much out. Besides, the Senate agreed with me on the age restriction amendment. I just want to improve the bill.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #21 on: January 26, 2012, 08:26:04 AM »
Aye
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #22 on: January 28, 2012, 01:34:19 PM »
Aye
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #23 on: January 28, 2012, 11:57:54 PM »
I am offering this as a friendly amendment:

Section 3: Miscellaneous

1. The RG shall receive a $50,000 bonus for the year 2012, as a reward for a great job handling an excessive workload.
2. A documentary about the life and times of Governor, Senator, and President Bgwah shall be produced and distributed for viewing in 8th grade classrooms, for educational and inspirational purposes.
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892
« Reply #24 on: January 29, 2012, 12:08:22 AM »
Quote from: Senator 20RP12 (IFP-MA) on January 29, 2012, 12:05:49 AM
Quote from: No Good Napoleon on January 28, 2012, 11:57:54 PM
I am offering this as a friendly amendment:

Section 3: Miscellaneous

1. The RG shall receive a $50,000 bonus for the year 2012, as a reward for a great job handling an excessive workload.
2. A documentary about the life and times of Governor, Senator, and President Bgwah shall be produced and distributed for viewing in 8th grade classrooms, for educational and inspirational purposes.

Why can't you just introduce this as separate legislation? I'd support the first one, but I don't know about the second one...Tongue

It doesn't need to be separate I.e. it would take up an entire slot...
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.041 seconds with 12 queries.