Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 20, 2013, 08:04:34 pm
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
U.S. Presidential Election Results
2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
(Moderator:
True Federalist
)
For Democrats: Does 2000...
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
Poll
Question:
Does the whole electoral process of 2000 bring up an unexplainable anger in you?
Yes
74 (60.2%)
No
19 (15.4%)
I'm not a Democrat
30 (24.4%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 119
Author
Topic: For Democrats: Does 2000... (Read 20624 times)
Bo
Rochambeau
YaBB God
Posts: 14684
Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #50 on:
April 29, 2010, 12:52:42 am »
Oh yeah!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
Posts: 4704
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #51 on:
April 29, 2010, 05:27:01 pm »
I thought that the Republicans were angry at their base in 2000 which cost them 5 seats in the senate and a few in the house. Their base was very unhappy, my parents included, that Clinton got away with all the white collar crimes he committed in the White House. When Clinton was acquitted by the Senate, the GOP was doomed for 2000.
Logged
I'm Derek and I approve this message.
Bo
Rochambeau
YaBB God
Posts: 14684
Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #52 on:
April 29, 2010, 05:38:01 pm »
Quote from: Derek on April 29, 2010, 05:27:01 pm
I thought that the Republicans were angry at their base in 2000 which cost them 5 seats in the senate and a few in the house. Their base was very unhappy, my parents included, that Clinton got away with all the white collar crimes he committed in the White House. When Clinton was acquitted by the Senate, the GOP was doomed for 2000.
If the Republicans were doomed in 2000, why did Bush Jr. win that year and why did the GOP retain control of Congress that year as well?
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
Posts: 4704
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #53 on:
April 29, 2010, 05:55:05 pm »
Quote from: Interrmoderate on April 29, 2010, 05:38:01 pm
Quote from: Derek on April 29, 2010, 05:27:01 pm
I thought that the Republicans were angry at their base in 2000 which cost them 5 seats in the senate and a few in the house. Their base was very unhappy, my parents included, that Clinton got away with all the white collar crimes he committed in the White House. When Clinton was acquitted by the Senate, the GOP was doomed for 2000.
If the Republicans were doomed in 2000, why did Bush Jr. win that year and why did the GOP retain control of Congress that year as well?
1. They didn't regain, they had control and lost seats in the house.
2. Bush Jr. didn't even win the popular vote.
3. The public was more happy with Clinton then than at any other time in his administration.
Logged
I'm Derek and I approve this message.
Bo
Rochambeau
YaBB God
Posts: 14684
Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #54 on:
April 29, 2010, 06:18:56 pm »
Quote from: Derek on April 29, 2010, 05:55:05 pm
Quote from: Interrmoderate on April 29, 2010, 05:38:01 pm
Quote from: Derek on April 29, 2010, 05:27:01 pm
I thought that the Republicans were angry at their base in 2000 which cost them 5 seats in the senate and a few in the house. Their base was very unhappy, my parents included, that Clinton got away with all the white collar crimes he committed in the White House. When Clinton was acquitted by the Senate, the GOP was doomed for 2000.
If the Republicans were doomed in 2000, why did Bush Jr. win that year and why did the GOP retain control of Congress that year as well?
1. They didn't regain, they had control and lost seats in the house.
2. Bush Jr. didn't even win the popular vote.
3. The public was more happy with Clinton then than at any other time in his administration.
1. I didn't say regain--I said retain control of Congress, which the GOP did in 2000
2. Popular vote is irrelevant. It is only the electoral vote that couts, which Bush Jr. won.
3. Maybe, but it doesn't matter since Clinton was unable to run in 2000.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
Posts: 4704
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #55 on:
April 30, 2010, 12:53:37 pm »
I think Bush was seen as the Washington outsider so his perception wasn't linked to the GOP in the House and Senate who lost that year. By lost I mean lost seats.
Logged
I'm Derek and I approve this message.
Bo
Rochambeau
YaBB God
Posts: 14684
Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #56 on:
April 30, 2010, 05:36:11 pm »
Quote from: Derek on April 30, 2010, 12:53:37 pm
I think Bush was seen as the Washington outsider so his perception wasn't linked to the GOP in the House and Senate who lost that year. By lost I mean lost seats.
I still disproved your point that the GOP was doomed in 2000. Winning the Presidency and keeping control of Congress does not make for a doomed party.
Logged
N.i.K.
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
Posts: 9221
Political Matrix
E: -1.94, S: 0.70
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #57 on:
May 01, 2010, 01:58:02 am »
Please do not bump dead threads.
Logged
Derek
YaBB God
Posts: 4704
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #58 on:
May 01, 2010, 04:42:20 pm »
"Doomed" maybe a strong word but they certainly weren't looking at picking any seats up in congress.
Logged
I'm Derek and I approve this message.
Hashemite
YaBB God
Posts: 30166
Political Matrix
E: -1.29, S: -7.30
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #59 on:
May 01, 2010, 04:43:31 pm »
Quote from: Derek on May 01, 2010, 04:42:20 pm
"Doomed" maybe a strong word but they certainly weren't looking at picking any seats up in congress.
Die in a fire.
Logged
Quote
20:12 oakvale Taylor Swift's 22 was originally titled 75 in reference to her ex Flanby's proposed tax rate
Quote
20:49 Snowstalker yes, but i'm the kind of fascist who would have backed the allies
20:57 Snowstalker sadly, it's a legitimate ideology tarnished by the incompetent mussolini and the vile hitler
Derek
YaBB God
Posts: 4704
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #60 on:
May 02, 2010, 04:01:40 am »
Quote from: Orleanser on May 01, 2010, 04:43:31 pm
Quote from: Derek on May 01, 2010, 04:42:20 pm
"Doomed" maybe a strong word but they certainly weren't looking at picking any seats up in congress.
Die in a fire.
after you
Logged
I'm Derek and I approve this message.
Bo
Rochambeau
YaBB God
Posts: 14684
Political Matrix
E: -5.23, S: -2.52
Re: For Democrats: Does 2000...
«
Reply #61 on:
May 09, 2010, 02:04:52 pm »
Quote from: Derek on May 02, 2010, 04:01:40 am
Quote from: Orleanser on May 01, 2010, 04:43:31 pm
Quote from: Derek on May 01, 2010, 04:42:20 pm
"Doomed" maybe a strong word but they certainly weren't looking at picking any seats up in congress.
Die in a fire.
after you
You first.
Logged
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...