Kal's Amendment [Rejected]

[TJ in Oregon]

Aye

[Mopsus]

Abstain
With the recent dissolution passing both parties, I don't know how necessary this is.

[bgwah]

nay

[Napoleon]

I was thinking: If we do decide to elect the Vice President separately from the President, might we also consider electing other cabinet members independently as well? Not something that I would necessarily support, just something that I thought I'd throw out there.

Sounds like a ploy to screw JCPers out of cabinet spots and give them to RPPers, if you ask me.

I'd actually support that, since it is consistent.

[Junkie]

I was thinking: If we do decide to elect the Vice President separately from the President, might we also consider electing other cabinet members independently as well? Not something that I would necessarily support, just something that I thought I'd throw out there.

Sounds like a ploy to screw JCPers out of cabinet spots and give them to RPPers, if you ask me.

I'd actually support that, since it is consistent.

Aye

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

Aye.

[Napoleon]

Nay

[Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee]

Nay

[Marokai Backbeat]

Regrettably, this Amendment is now failing, and Senators have 24 hours to change their votes.

[Mopsus]

I change my vote to AYE.

[tmthforu94]

I change my vote to AYE.

[Fmr President & Senator Polnut]

I completely disagree with the idea of mixing the executive and legislative roles, such as elected cabinet members.

On this point, I admit I'm very torn on this.

I honestly don't see the real benefit of this besides just another way to spice the game up?

[Marokai Backbeat]

Regrettably, this Amendment is now failing, and Senators have 24 hours to change their votes.

Despite MoPolitico's commendable vote change, this Amendment has failed. Shame.