Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 27, 2014, 07:53:17 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Questions and Answers
| |-+  Presidential Election Process
| | |-+  Gary Johnson
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Gary Johnson  (Read 3040 times)
throatcutter
Rookie
*
Posts: 28
View Profile
« on: January 22, 2012, 10:36:18 pm »
Ignore

AFAIK, Johnson is seeking the presidential nomination by the Libertarian Party.
Does that mean he is not a member of the GOP anymore?
If so, could he still be chosen as VP by the Republican presidential candidate?
Logged

x≥ + x≤ + x + 1 = 0 ⇔ x1 = -1 ∧ x2 = i ∧ x3 = -i
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27980
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #1 on: January 29, 2012, 02:31:32 pm »
Ignore

He could, but he never was going to be considered as Republican running mate.  Nor do I think the Libertarian Party will turn to him.  If they do, they give up any claim to being more than a joke party.  Not that they aren't a joke party, but I doubt they want to admit it.

Besides, Johnson could cause the Libertarians some ballot issues they likely don't want.  Johnson appeared on the GOP ballot here in South Carolina (losing to Cain Colbert among others) and we have a sore loser law that keeps the loser of one party's primary from appearing on the general election ballot, even as the nominee of another party.  Not certain if that law applies to Presidential candidates, but if it did, the Libertarians would have to place another name in place of his here.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
АverroŽs Nix
AverroŽs Nix
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9846
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 29, 2012, 02:58:39 pm »
Ignore

Johnson appeared on the GOP ballot here in South Carolina (losing to Cain Colbert among others) and we have a sore loser law that keeps the loser of one party's primary from appearing on the general election ballot, even as the nominee of another party.  Not certain if that law applies to Presidential candidates, but if it did, the Libertarians would have to place another name in place of his here.

Sore loser laws typically do not apply to presidential candidates, so that concern, at least, is probably irrelevant.
Logged

Is Totally Not Feeblepizza.
Crackers
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 290
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2012, 06:42:57 pm »
Ignore

I believe that Johnson is now a member of the Libertarian Party. I remember when Jimmy McMillan had to switch his voter registration from Dem to Republican in order to run for the GOP nod (btw, is he even still running?), so I think that in order for Johnson to run for the LP nod he would have to change his voter registration from GOP to LP. That said, his chances of being selected as the GOP veep are at absolute zero. They were at absolute zero even when he was still a Republican. I doubt Ron Paul would even consider him for the job.

He could, but he never was going to be considered as Republican running mate.  Nor do I think the Libertarian Party will turn to him.  If they do, they give up any claim to being more than a joke party.  Not that they aren't a joke party, but I doubt they want to admit it.
I don't think the LP would look like a joke party by nominating Johnson. After all, he was a two term governor of New Mexico and is apparently still popular to get, like, 23% in a poll with Romney, who is perceived as the strongest possible GOP nominee. Even if he were somehow a "joke", he's definitely less of a joke then certain previous nominees (Borat costar Bob Barr, anyone?).

And sore loser laws are ridiculous. But that's besides the point.
Logged

lawlz
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27980
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #4 on: January 29, 2012, 09:16:12 pm »
Ignore

If Johnson had started out running as a Libertarian, I'd agree he wouldn't tarnish the Libertarians if he were their nominee.  As a failed nominee of another party, he does.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
Is Totally Not Feeblepizza.
Crackers
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 290
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 30, 2012, 03:48:01 pm »
Ignore

If Johnson had started out running as a Libertarian, I'd agree he wouldn't tarnish the Libertarians if he were their nominee.  As a failed nominee of another party, he does.
Did Ron Paul, a then-former Republican who had lost three separate races for the House as well as a Senate primary, tarnish the Libertarian Party in 1988? Not really. He got half a percent of the vote, which was more than David Bergland's total in 1984 and Andre Marrou's in 1992 (both with a third of a percent). Since then, Paul's total has only been matched once, by Harry Browne in 1996.
Logged

lawlz
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27980
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: February 01, 2012, 01:37:17 am »
Ignore

If Johnson had started out running as a Libertarian, I'd agree he wouldn't tarnish the Libertarians if he were their nominee.  As a failed nominee of another party, he does.
Did Ron Paul, a then-former Republican who had lost three separate races for the House as well as a Senate primary, tarnish the Libertarian Party in 1988? Not really. He got half a percent of the vote, which was more than David Bergland's total in 1984 and Andre Marrou's in 1992 (both with a third of a percent). Since then, Paul's total has only been matched once, by Harry Browne in 1996.
Paul did not attempt to get the Republican nomination in 1988, which is a crucial difference.  He started off that campaign cycle running as a Libertarian.  He didn't switch after losing the nomination of his first choice party.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
SteveRogers
duncan298
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 470


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: -5.04

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2012, 11:53:44 pm »
Ignore

Johnson appeared on the GOP ballot here in South Carolina (losing to Cain Colbert among others) and we have a sore loser law that keeps the loser of one party's primary from appearing on the general election ballot, even as the nominee of another party.  Not certain if that law applies to Presidential candidates, but if it did, the Libertarians would have to place another name in place of his here.

Sore loser laws typically do not apply to presidential candidates, so that concern, at least, is probably irrelevant.
This is mostly true, but there still at least a couple of states whose sore loser laws as written seem to apply to presidential candidates. There's good precedent to indicate that such laws wouldn't hold up if challenged in court, but that would require money that the Libertarian party probably doesn't have.
Logged
Citizen Superique
Superique
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2226
Brazil


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 22, 2012, 07:44:13 am »
Ignore

Gary Johnson hasn't lost the GOP Prymary, he did not even run it seriously and he has dropped out before Iowa so he didn't really campaigned for the Republican Nomination. There is a strong possibility of a Libertarian Nomination for him and he is going to split some Romney Voters, specially in the South...
Logged

"When people want less of taxes and more of everything else, you've got a problem." Jerry Brown

"Government has become so vast and impersonal that its interests diverge more and more from the interests of ordinary citizens." George McGovern

"Don't pray for easy lives, pray to be stronger man." John F. Kennedy
ask_not
donavan_ed
Full Member
***
Posts: 153
View Profile
« Reply #9 on: August 02, 2012, 06:16:22 pm »
Ignore

If Johnson had started out running as a Libertarian, I'd agree he wouldn't tarnish the Libertarians if he were their nominee.  As a failed nominee of another party, he does.
I wish the libertarians could win.
Logged
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27980
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: August 02, 2012, 10:28:37 pm »
Ignore

Johnson appeared on the GOP ballot here in South Carolina (losing to Cain Colbert among others) and we have a sore loser law that keeps the loser of one party's primary from appearing on the general election ballot, even as the nominee of another party.  Not certain if that law applies to Presidential candidates, but if it did, the Libertarians would have to place another name in place of his here.

Sore loser laws typically do not apply to presidential candidates, so that concern, at least, is probably irrelevant.
This is mostly true, but there still at least a couple of states whose sore loser laws as written seem to apply to presidential candidates. There's good precedent to indicate that such laws wouldn't hold up if challenged in court, but that would require money that the Libertarian party probably doesn't have.

While it hasn't been done to him in South Carolina (that I know of), the Michigan Secretary of State has refused to put him on the ballot and the Libertarians are suing to get him on.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15116
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: August 03, 2012, 03:58:42 pm »
Ignore

Johnson appeared on the GOP ballot here in South Carolina (losing to Cain Colbert among others) and we have a sore loser law that keeps the loser of one party's primary from appearing on the general election ballot, even as the nominee of another party.  Not certain if that law applies to Presidential candidates, but if it did, the Libertarians would have to place another name in place of his here.

Sore loser laws typically do not apply to presidential candidates, so that concern, at least, is probably irrelevant.
This is mostly true, but there still at least a couple of states whose sore loser laws as written seem to apply to presidential candidates. There's good precedent to indicate that such laws wouldn't hold up if challenged in court, but that would require money that the Libertarian party probably doesn't have.

While it hasn't been done to him in South Carolina (that I know of), the Michigan Secretary of State has refused to put him on the ballot and the Libertarians are suing to get him on.
They have a differant Gary E. Johnson on the ballot there Tongue
Logged

If a burial strikes my family as too practical, I'd go for either a viking funeral on one of the Great Lakes or to be sealed up in a tomb with my closest servants and bang-maids so they may wait on my every need in the afterlife.
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22148
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.09

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: August 04, 2012, 08:26:20 pm »
Ignore

If Johnson had started out running as a Libertarian, I'd agree he wouldn't tarnish the Libertarians if he were their nominee.  As a failed nominee of another party, he does.

I wish the libertarians could win.

I do too, but it won't happen. At least not for a very long time.
Logged

Vacationing in New Jersey 08/23-08/30


Also, it's so R-Money to unabashedly ruin a thousand dollar suit with ice water and laugh about it.
only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58778
India


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: August 16, 2012, 07:50:08 am »
Ignore

Johnson appeared on the GOP ballot here in South Carolina (losing to Cain Colbert among others) and we have a sore loser law that keeps the loser of one party's primary from appearing on the general election ballot, even as the nominee of another party.  Not certain if that law applies to Presidential candidates, but if it did, the Libertarians would have to place another name in place of his here.

Sore loser laws typically do not apply to presidential candidates, so that concern, at least, is probably irrelevant.
This is mostly true, but there still at least a couple of states whose sore loser laws as written seem to apply to presidential candidates. There's good precedent to indicate that such laws wouldn't hold up if challenged in court, but that would require money that the Libertarian party probably doesn't have.

While it hasn't been done to him in South Carolina (that I know of), the Michigan Secretary of State has refused to put him on the ballot and the Libertarians are suing to get him on.
They have a differant Gary E. Johnson on the ballot there Tongue
Seriously!? That's hilarious.
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
SJoyce of Harrenhal
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8844
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: August 16, 2012, 10:49:51 am »
Ignore

Johnson appeared on the GOP ballot here in South Carolina (losing to Cain Colbert among others) and we have a sore loser law that keeps the loser of one party's primary from appearing on the general election ballot, even as the nominee of another party.  Not certain if that law applies to Presidential candidates, but if it did, the Libertarians would have to place another name in place of his here.

Sore loser laws typically do not apply to presidential candidates, so that concern, at least, is probably irrelevant.
This is mostly true, but there still at least a couple of states whose sore loser laws as written seem to apply to presidential candidates. There's good precedent to indicate that such laws wouldn't hold up if challenged in court, but that would require money that the Libertarian party probably doesn't have.

While it hasn't been done to him in South Carolina (that I know of), the Michigan Secretary of State has refused to put him on the ballot and the Libertarians are suing to get him on.
They have a differant Gary E. Johnson on the ballot there Tongue
Seriously!? That's hilarious.
Gary E. Johnson of Austin, Texas, is a Libertarian Party higher-up and has consented to be the nominee of the Libertarian Party for President of the United States of Michigan if a lawsuit doesn't work (which it will, since the law hasn't changed from 1980, when the Michigan SoS said their sore loser law didn't apply to Presidential primaries and allowed Anderson to go on the ballot).
Logged

True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27980
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: August 16, 2012, 11:50:40 pm »
Ignore

Johnson appeared on the GOP ballot here in South Carolina (losing to Cain Colbert among others) and we have a sore loser law that keeps the loser of one party's primary from appearing on the general election ballot, even as the nominee of another party.  Not certain if that law applies to Presidential candidates, but if it did, the Libertarians would have to place another name in place of his here.

Sore loser laws typically do not apply to presidential candidates, so that concern, at least, is probably irrelevant.
This is mostly true, but there still at least a couple of states whose sore loser laws as written seem to apply to presidential candidates. There's good precedent to indicate that such laws wouldn't hold up if challenged in court, but that would require money that the Libertarian party probably doesn't have.

While it hasn't been done to him in South Carolina (that I know of), the Michigan Secretary of State has refused to put him on the ballot and the Libertarians are suing to get him on.
They have a different Gary E. Johnson on the ballot there Tongue
Seriously!? That's hilarious.
Gary E. Johnson of Austin, Texas, is a Libertarian Party higher-up and has consented to be the nominee of the Libertarian Party for President of the United States of Michigan if a lawsuit doesn't work (which it will, since the law hasn't changed from 1980, when the Michigan SoS said their sore loser law didn't apply to Presidential primaries and allowed Anderson to go on the ballot).

Except ballot access lawsuits often don't get settled until after the election.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines