Home 2012 Election Results Election Info Weblog Wiki Search Email Site Info Store

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 19, 2013, 09:33:01 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections (Moderators: Mr. Morden, Bacon King, Big DaddyTX)
| | |-+  What kind of person would agree to be Newt's running mate?		 « previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: What kind of person would agree to be Newt's running mate?  (Read 299 times)
BeccaM
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1033
United States


View Profile
« on: January 26, 2012, 03:34:54 am »
Ignore
Certainly none of the always discussed "rising stars" would join that suicide mission. Whose career is already dead enough to not care?

Gingrich/Santorum?
Logged
Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14406
United States Minor Outlying Islands


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 26, 2012, 03:49:33 am »
Hell, Gingrich/Romney? It's not like he has any other political future and a "unifying move" like that might be needed after a divisive primary.
Logged
BeccaM
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1033
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 26, 2012, 03:54:34 am »
Ignore
I figured Romney was too much of a baby to accept anything but the top spot.
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34381
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: January 26, 2012, 08:19:08 am »
Ignore
Melissa Midwest.
Logged
"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"

registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
GPORTER
gporter
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6303
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 26, 2012, 09:07:51 am »
Ignore
Quote from: BeccaM on January 26, 2012, 03:54:34 am
I figured Romney was too much of a baby to accept anything but the top spot.

If McCain had offered it to him in 2008, Romney would have accepted.
Logged
George Deukmjican will become to next President of the United States. You must read it to believe it.

Duekmjican: 287
Bradley: 241
Paul: 0

"So, I leave you all tonight with a full heart and a fervent prayer that we will meet again and we will meet often in this land where miracles are always happening, where every day is a new beginning and every life a blessing from God.

So I want to say thanks to each one of you here. Thank y
Vote UKIP!
MasterSanders
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1001
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: January 26, 2012, 11:07:22 am »
Ignore
I will go on a limb and say Mitch Daniels would be Newt's running mate.
  • Mitch is everything Newt is not: calm, a governor, moderate, monogamous, and liked by Washington insiders
  • As mentioned above, Mitch is more liked by Establishment Republicans more than Mitt. A Daniels VP-ship would more palatable to Washington insiders.
Logged
RogueBeaver
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8065
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: January 26, 2012, 11:10:11 am »
Ignore
A masochist.
Logged
+7.35, +3.65


Quote from: Peternerdman on December 31, 2012, 03:34:54 pm
Never thought I'd say this, but I'm praying for another black-yellow majority, and for the SPD to get shattered.  It's exactly what it deserves.
Is Totally Not Feeblepizza.
Crackers
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 290
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: January 26, 2012, 11:29:59 am »
Ignore
Quote from: GPORTER on January 26, 2012, 09:07:51 am
Quote from: BeccaM on January 26, 2012, 03:54:34 am
I figured Romney was too much of a baby to accept anything but the top spot.

If McCain had offered it to him in 2008, Romney would have accepted.
Yes, he would have. Because McCain never really had much of a chance anyway and Romney could further solidify his position as the "next guy in line".
Logged
lawlz
Jacobtm
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3059


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: January 26, 2012, 11:34:02 am »
Ignore
A Sarah Palin type clown.

This whole election has been characterized by heavy-hitting Republicans sitting out. I guess all along they were too scared to take on Obama, even with crazy high unemployment.

Next cycle, I'm willing to bet Republicans easily take the presidency, since Democrats will probably revert to form and choose some lame candidate.
Logged
Why do so many people here cheer on war crimes?
Quote from: Vosem on March 24, 2012, 12:00:30 pm
Israel and the United States "killing dozens of civilians with explosives", as you phrase it, has, throughout history, almost always been a good thing.
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory