Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 02, 2015, 02:04:38 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints vs US
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: What's it gonna be boy? Sound or unsound?
Sound   -5 (71.4%)
Unsound   -2 (28.6%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 7

Author Topic: Late Corporation of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints vs US  (Read 706 times)
only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58759
India


View Profile
« on: January 28, 2012, 12:11:08 pm »
Ignore

What's this?
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
only back for the worldcup
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58759
India


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 28, 2012, 12:13:10 pm »
Ignore

And while you're at it, also give me your opinion on Davis vs Beason.
Logged

"The secret to having a rewarding work-life balance is to have no life. Then it's easy to keep things balanced by doing no work." Wally



"Our party do not have any ideology... Our main aim is to grab power ... Every one is doing so but I say it openly." Keshav Dev Maurya
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29493
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: January 28, 2012, 05:04:38 pm »

Both of them are sound though poorly written by modern sensibilities.  Also one needs to be careful applying them.

The core of both opinions is that the government power to criminalize certain acts of commission cannot be vetoed by personal religious beliefs.

Of course, if one tried to apply this to government power to criminalize acts of omission then it would give government the power to require people to engage in activities contrary to their religious beliefs, which the First Amendment prohibits.
Logged

did the Speaker spend his entire winter in a tanning salon, hibernating?
The one thing everyone can agree on is that the media is biased against them.
© tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36129
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 29, 2012, 07:56:00 am »
Ignore

led to a response by God the Father, who moved to prohibit polygamy within the Church shortly thereafter.
Logged

“They cheated us again and again, made decisions behind our back, presenting us with completed facts. That’s the way it was with the expansion of NATO in the East, with the deployment of military infrastructure at our borders. They always told us the same thing: 'Well, this doesn't concern you.'" -Vladimir Putin
Charlotte Hebdo
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7576
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 19, 2012, 07:12:29 am »
Ignore

led to a response by God the Father, who moved to prohibit polygamy within the Church shortly thereafter.
It is funny how the Mormons always seem to get a revelation at just the right time! All though the Lord waited a little too long regarding the black priesthood thing.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines