PPP-OH/MO: Mittens not doing well in states he hasn't bought yet
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 29, 2024, 09:20:28 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  PPP-OH/MO: Mittens not doing well in states he hasn't bought yet
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: PPP-OH/MO: Mittens not doing well in states he hasn't bought yet  (Read 2788 times)
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,876


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: January 31, 2012, 02:55:33 PM »

MO Primary
Santorum 45
Romney 34
Paul 13

MO Caucus
Gingrich 30
Santorum 28
Romney 24
Paul 11

OH Primary
Gingrich 26
Romney 25
Santorum 22
Paul 11

http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/main/2012/01/trouble-ahead-for-romney.html
Logged
Niemeyerite
JulioMadrid
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,803
Spain


Political Matrix
E: -8.65, S: -9.04

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2012, 03:35:27 PM »

Surprising results for Santorum, specially in OH
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,594
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: January 31, 2012, 04:06:55 PM »

Seems like Gingrich is much weaker outside of the South.
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,149
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: January 31, 2012, 04:10:33 PM »

Surprising results for Santorum, specially in OH
Not really.  Santorum's campaign is really tailored for the midwest.
Logged
Mehmentum
Icefire9
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,594
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: January 31, 2012, 04:33:18 PM »

I was looking ahead to primary day with MO,MN, and CO. As an anti Romney person, I thought that MO might be the best chance to beat Romney on that day. Does anyone else agree? Could Romney loose all three...Gingrich of Santorum taking Missouri, Paul taking Minnesota and Colorado?
PPP had Gingrich almost doubling Romney's numbers in Minnesotta, but Polling for caucuses is very innacurate.  I think any of the four candidates could plausibly win Minnesotta.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: January 31, 2012, 06:50:14 PM »
« Edited: January 31, 2012, 07:02:30 PM by Eraserhead »

Mitt will purchase Ohio, unfortunately. I doubt anyone is going to care about Missouri and their fake primary/little caucus.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,357
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: January 31, 2012, 07:01:35 PM »

Mitt will purchase Ohio, unfortunately. I doubt anyone is going to care Missouri and their fake primary/little caucus.

Mitt can't purchase states forever.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: January 31, 2012, 07:03:22 PM »

We are not a footnote.
Logged
mondale84
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,307
United States


Political Matrix
E: -3.23, S: -3.30

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: January 31, 2012, 11:15:33 PM »

Mitt will purchase Ohio, unfortunately. I doubt anyone is going to care Missouri and their fake primary/little caucus.

Mitt can't purchase states forever.

Watch him...
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,615


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 01, 2012, 02:38:23 AM »

Mitt will purchase Ohio, unfortunately. I doubt anyone is going to care Missouri and their fake primary/little caucus.

Mitt can't purchase states forever.

Watch him...

Or his PACs, thanks to Citizens United.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,405
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 01, 2012, 08:33:11 PM »

Mitt will purchase Ohio, unfortunately. I doubt anyone is going to care Missouri and their fake primary/little caucus.

Mitt can't purchase states forever.

He probably can during the course of the primaries. Of course, he'll be in for a rude awakening in the general.
Logged
J. J.
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 32,892
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 02, 2012, 12:42:47 AM »

Mitt will purchase Ohio, unfortunately. I doubt anyone is going to care Missouri and their fake primary/little caucus.

Mitt can't purchase states forever.

Watch him...

Or his PACs, thanks to Citizens United.

That change was one of the things I cited in the realignment thread.
Logged
Frozen Sky Ever Why
ShadowOfTheWave
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,611
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 02, 2012, 09:07:59 AM »

Everyone acts like Mitt's literally paying off voters. He puts his money into ads which expose the hypocrisy and worthless career of one Newt Gingrich. The voters are free to make up their own minds of whether to support the man or not.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,173
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 02, 2012, 09:18:10 AM »


In 5 weeks you will be.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,611


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 02, 2012, 09:43:38 AM »


Ok, dude. The fact of the matter is Santorum had an impact of this race while the rest of you were doubled over in laughter a month and a half ago, saying he would be out immediately after a disastrous performance in Iowa (or sooner). And only a few had the class to give him credit and admit you were wrong. Instead, it's "LOL HE WILL BE A LOSER SOON ENOUGH!"
Logged
TheGlobalizer
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,286
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 02, 2012, 01:28:53 PM »


Ok, dude. The fact of the matter is Santorum had an impact of this race while the rest of you were doubled over in laughter a month and a half ago, saying he would be out immediately after a disastrous performance in Iowa (or sooner). And only a few had the class to give him credit and admit you were wrong. Instead, it's "LOL HE WILL BE A LOSER SOON ENOUGH!"

LOL HE WILL BE A LOSER SOON ENOUGH!
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 14 queries.