Hot or Not: The "46 States to Go" Signs (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 30, 2024, 10:06:19 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Hot or Not: The "46 States to Go" Signs (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Did you think they were a good move or not?
#1
Hot
 
#2
Not
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 33

Author Topic: Hot or Not: The "46 States to Go" Signs  (Read 2492 times)
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« on: January 31, 2012, 10:29:19 PM »

If you ask me, they looked like something from an SNL parody of Gingrich. Rather unbecoming and, quite frankly, the sign of a sore loser.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,862
« Reply #1 on: January 31, 2012, 10:32:37 PM »
« Edited: January 31, 2012, 10:36:14 PM by Politico »

In the next few days your guy and his supporters are going to try and end the primary process after only four states have voted and less than 5% of delegates have been assigned, just like they tried to do after Mitt won New Hampshire. The American primary system is screwed up for a number of reasons, but none more so than the fact that the media and the parties push relentlessly to end the democratic process as soon as possible, before the vast majority of the country gets their say.

Hypothetical: Romney loses South Carolina, and comes out to a crowd of people waving "47 states to go" signs. What would you say then?

You just want this primary to drag on because it only helps Obama. It's OK to admit it.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.021 seconds with 15 queries.