Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
September 01, 2014, 09:04:27 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Congressional Elections (Moderator: Joe Republic)
| | |-+  what election was the biggest watershed in
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: what election was the biggest watershed in  (Read 890 times)
freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2291
United States


View Profile
« on: February 03, 2012, 09:46:37 am »
Ignore

establishing the democrats as the liberal party?

Here are some candidates
1932 - FDR era, democrats win massive congressional majorities
1958 - Democrats win a majority of non-southern seats for the first time in 20 years

1974 - Democrats get to 2/3 majorities in house and 3/5 in senate. Many of the freshman of this class help shape the democrats for years to come. After this election, Phillip Burton with the help of the freshman class help get rid of old committee chairman

2010 - blue dog caucus cut in half with remaining democrats more liberal.
Logged
Stranger in a strange land
strangeland
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6307
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 03, 2012, 01:58:56 pm »
Ignore

Clearly 1932, because that was the election which established the Democrats as the center-left and the Republicans as the center-right. Before that, voting was largely based either on Civil War allegiances or ethnic and interest group coalitions which had little to do with ideology. Of course, this remained true somewhat, and the transition still isn't fully complete and may never be. Also, the 1932 election heralded the beginning of the New Deal, which is pretty much the core of "American Liberalism".
Logged

Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14787
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: 4.35

View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 03, 2012, 02:05:29 pm »
Ignore

2010.

And when we lose even more blue dogs this year, the party will move further to the left Tongue
Logged


GM Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15413


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 03, 2012, 03:17:29 pm »
Ignore

2010.

And when we lose even more blue dogs this year, the party will move further to the left Tongue
Will you join the Republicans if that happens?
Logged

When I was in the third grade, I thought that I was Jewish
Because I could count, my nose was big, and I kept my bank account fullish
I told my mom, tears blurring my vision
He said, "Mort, you've loved God since before circumcision"
Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14787
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: 4.35

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 03, 2012, 07:21:42 pm »
Ignore

2010.

And when we lose even more blue dogs this year, the party will move further to the left Tongue
Will you join the Republicans if that happens?
Nah. The Republicans are way too far right for me Wink
Logged


A.G. Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17331
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -8.45, S: -4.26

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 03, 2012, 07:27:19 pm »
Ignore

1932.

The South would be the most left-wing area in the country if we probed them on the right issues in the right ways.
Logged

Jackson
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 616
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 03, 2012, 08:36:13 pm »
Ignore

1932.

The South would be the most left-wing area in the country if we probed them on the right issues in the right ways.
Is this a joke? The South has never been left-wing in its entire history.
Logged

Barnes & Noble
Roy Barnes 2010
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4700
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 03, 2012, 09:07:12 pm »
Ignore

1932.

The South would be the most left-wing area in the country if we probed them on the right issues in the right ways.
Is this a joke? The South has never been left-wing in its entire history.

Um, although it certainly doesn't define an entire regions or its ideology, but the South strongly supported FDR's New Deal programs; he's still held in very high regard by Georgians (I speek from experience), and from what I've seen, all the regions effected by the TVA.
Logged

freepcrusher
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2291
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 03, 2012, 09:17:11 pm »
Ignore

not to get off topic but the south in the 1930s was dirt poor and economically populist in the sense of Huey Long or Wright Patman. Of course they strongly supported FDR. Because Roosevelt didn't bring up the integration issue and issues like feminism/abortion rights, GLBT rights etc weren't issues at the time, the south found no reason to vote otherwise.
Logged
A.G. Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17331
Cuba


Political Matrix
E: -8.45, S: -4.26

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 03, 2012, 10:05:55 pm »
Ignore

Exactly. As seen with Bryan, Long, and Franklin Roosevelt, economic populism works well in the south.
Logged

GM Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15413


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 03, 2012, 10:21:43 pm »
Ignore

That was nearly a century ago.
Logged

When I was in the third grade, I thought that I was Jewish
Because I could count, my nose was big, and I kept my bank account fullish
I told my mom, tears blurring my vision
He said, "Mort, you've loved God since before circumcision"
Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14787
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: 4.35

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 03, 2012, 11:46:54 pm »
Ignore

1932.

The South would be the most left-wing area in the country if we probed them on the right issues in the right ways.

Agreed. Social conservatism sells very well down here. Poor/lower class whites don't vote in their economic interests.
Logged


RodPresident
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 847
Brazil


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 04, 2012, 07:13:07 am »
Ignore

I think that if Democrats were a bit more moderate on abortion (supporting only in life-threatening, malformations, maybe rape and incest), they'd be a lot more competitive in South. Mississippi showed that South isn't so fanatical pro-life as we believed that. Problem is that kinds of Boxer will veto this. Nature of Democratic coalition will bar another changes like in affirmative actions (although economical questions can hold a control of black vote by decades), immigration and same-sex marriage. If Democrat were more in line of Marcy Kaptur than Jackie Speier, they'd be a lot more popular in South.
Logged


10 years without Brizola
GM Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15413


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 04, 2012, 12:55:49 pm »
Ignore

I think that if Democrats were a bit more moderate on abortion (supporting only in life-threatening, malformations, maybe rape and incest), they'd be a lot more competitive in South. Mississippi showed that South isn't so fanatical pro-life as we believed that. Problem is that kinds of Boxer will veto this. Nature of Democratic coalition will bar another changes like in affirmative actions (although economical questions can hold a control of black vote by decades), immigration and same-sex marriage. If Democrat were more in line of Marcy Kaptur than Jackie Speier, they'd be a lot more popular in South.
You can't just add the South to the Dem coalition. Whatever gains made will be offset by losing wealthier liberal voters. Democrats should be more like Boxer and Speier, less like Kaptur. I'm fine with ceding the fundie vote to Republicans, it is the only way socially liberal policies have a chance.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2012, 07:23:37 pm by Senator Napoleon »Logged

When I was in the third grade, I thought that I was Jewish
Because I could count, my nose was big, and I kept my bank account fullish
I told my mom, tears blurring my vision
He said, "Mort, you've loved God since before circumcision"
RodPresident
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 847
Brazil


Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -3.30

View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 04, 2012, 04:57:45 pm »
Ignore

I think that Democrats should shift focus only in some issues, like abortion, from radical pro-choice to a more moderate choice. Gun rights is one of affairs that can be go to a more moderate position too. Gay rights are going to be a more acceptable thing, even in South. I believe that Southern democrats, like Bright or Taylor, would be more willing to vote for Obamacare if that contained Stupak-Pitts.
« Last Edit: February 05, 2012, 04:08:43 pm by RodPresident »Logged


10 years without Brizola
Robb the Survivor
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30633
France


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 05, 2012, 12:01:47 pm »
Ignore

1932, 1936, 1948, 1958 and 1964 all contributed. You could even go beyond and say the first stone was set in 1896.
Logged



Robb of the House Stark, First of his Name, Lord of Winterfell and King in the North



Quote from: IRC
22:15   ComradeSibboleth   this is all extremely terrible and in all respects absolutely fycking dire.

"A reformist is someone who realizes that, when you bang your head on a wall, it's the head that breaks rather than the wall."

Peppino, from the movie Baaria
Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12788


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 06, 2012, 09:23:15 am »
Ignore

Democrats getting 218 seats means electing a lot more moderates and conservatives in certain districts. They can't do what Republicans did and get highly partisan members in enough districts to get a majority.
Logged
Carlos Danger
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8404
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: February 07, 2012, 12:39:40 am »
Ignore

1828, obviously.  They became a reactionary party later on.
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines