Engineer
Rookie
Posts: 77
|
 |
« on: January 06, 2005, 08:36:10 AM » |
|
The report also contends there were widespread instances of intimidation and misinformation, improper purging of voter registration lists, a lack of inspection for about 93,000 ballots where no vote was cast for president, and vote totals not matching registration numbers or exit poll data.
Just a snippet from the article.
1. Widespread intimidation and misinformation - I do believe that challenging somebody does not fall under the scope of intimidation. If you are legally registered, a question of your legality is not intimidation. Only people who are not legally registered can feel intimidated. There are instances of Democrat misinforming voters, will these be explored?
2. a lack of inspection for about 93,000 ballots where no vote was cast for president - What is to inspect? If their isn't a vote, you can't divine what the voter means. Oh wait, if you're a Democrat you can. Some people just don't cast a vote for the President. To assume everybody does is wrong.
3. vote totals not matching registration numbers - horribly wrong here, but okay in Washington.
4. and vote totals not matching ... exit poll data - as if polls are completely accurate and actually vote counts are not. Just look at Zogby's wonderful polls. When Venezuela had elections, and the exit polls differed from the actually vote count, Jimmy Carter and follow Democrats discounted the exit polls as being wrong. I guess that rationale doesn't apply here.
Everything they have to present has been debunked. They just can't stand the fact that they lost.
|
