Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 21, 2014, 11:17:17 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections (Moderators: Mr. Morden, Bacon King, Sheriff Buford TX Justice)
| | |-+  Obama vs. Romney would be a below average “political experience” race.
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Obama vs. Romney would be a below average “political experience” race.  (Read 532 times)
retromike22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1714
United States


View Profile
« on: February 04, 2012, 02:14:22 am »
Ignore

I think a lot of people have forgotten that Romney served as Governor for only.... 4 years. Yes, Obama was only a senator for 4 years but I also think that his problems in dealing with the Republicans were somewhat due a naive hopefulness of conciliation.

So in the middle of the night I was thinking… what is the combined major political experience of recent two major party candidates at the time of their election? Major experience being: President, vice President, Governor, Senator, or Cabinet Member.

Eisenhower 0 yrs + Stevenson 4 yrs as Governor = 4 yrs
Eisenhower 4 yrs as President + Stevenson 4yrs as Gov = 8 yrs
Kennedy 8yrs as Senator + Nixon 10 ys (8yrs as V. Pres + 2 yrs as Senator) = 18 yrs
Johnson 16 yrs (1 yr as Pres + 3 yrs as Vice Pres + 12 yrs as Sen) + Goldwater 12 yrs = 28 yrs
Nixon 10yrs (8yrs as V. Pres + 2 yrs as Sen) + Humphrey  20 yrs (4 yrs as V. Pres + 16 yrs as Sen) = 30 yrs
Nixon 14 yrs (4 yrs as Pres + 8 yrs as V. Pres + 2 yrs as Sen) + McGovern 10 yrs = 24 yrs
Carter 4rs as Gov + Ford 3 yrs (2 yrs as Pres + 1 yr as V. Pres) = 7 yrs
Reagan 8 yrs as Gov + Carter 8 yrs (4 yrs as Pres + 4 yrs as Gov) = 16 yrs
Reagan 12 yrs (4 yrs as Pres + 8 yrs as Gov) + Mondale 16 yrs (4 yrs as V. Pres + 12 yrs as Sen) = 28 yrs
Bush 8 yrs of V Pres + Dukakis 10 yrs as Gov = 18 yrs
Clinton 12 yrs as Gov + Bush 12 yrs (4 yrs of Pres + 8 yrs of V Pres) = 24 yrs
Clinton 16 yrs (4 yrs as Pres + 12 yrs as Gov) + Dole 28 yrs as Sen = 44 yrs
Bush 6 yrs as Gov + Gore 16 yrs (8 yrs as V Pres + 8 yrs as Sen) = 22 yrs
Bush 10 yrs (4 yrs as Pres + 6 yrs as Gov) + Kerry (20 yrs as Senator) = 30 yrs
Obama 4 yrs as Sen + McCain 22 yrs as Sen = 26 yrs

Obama vs. Romney would be:
Obama 8 yrs (4 yrs as Pres + 4 yrs as Sen) + Romney 4 yrs = 12 years.

Under this criteria:
Paul: 0
Gingrich: 0, but 4 if you count Speaker as major
Santorum: 12.
Logged

I wrote and directed my own movie. It's about an intern, a doctor, a mayor, a cross dressing prostitute, farmers, aliens, and zombies:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=181696.0
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4886
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 04, 2012, 02:32:20 am »
Ignore

You all know how I feel about Gingrich, but being Speaker is akin to being de facto leader of your party in the absence of controlling the presidency. There is a reason why the Speaker is in line to be president right after the vice-president. Definitely as serious as any position in the Senate.

Other than that, nice tabulation.
« Last Edit: February 04, 2012, 02:34:57 am by Politico »Logged

"Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."

- Bastiat
retromike22
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1714
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 04, 2012, 05:48:47 pm »
Ignore

You're right, Speaker should count. In that case, Gingrich would get 4 yrs and 6 yrs as Minority Whip. If we are including major leadership positions in the House, then Ford would get an additional 9 yrs when he was the Minority Leader of the House.

Carter 4rs as Gov + Ford 12 yrs (2 yrs as Pres + 1 yr as V. Pres + 9 yrs as Minority Leader) = 16 yrs

For 2012:

Obama 8 yrs (4 yrs as Pres + 4 yrs as Sen) + Romney 4 yrs = 12 yrs.

Obama 8 yrs (4 yrs as Pres + 4 yrs as Sen) + Paul 0 yrs  = 12 yrs.

Obama 8 yrs (4 yrs as Pres + 4 yrs as Sen) + Gingrich 10 yrs (4 yrs as Speaker + 6 yrs as Minority Whip) = 18 yrs.

Obama 8 yrs (4 yrs as Pres + 4 yrs as Sen) + Santorum 12 yrs as Sen = 20 years.

Gingrich and Santorum vs Obama would be more average, but Romney vs. Obama would be the lowest combined "major political experience" since... 1956, with Eisenhower vs. Stevenson.
Logged

I wrote and directed my own movie. It's about an intern, a doctor, a mayor, a cross dressing prostitute, farmers, aliens, and zombies:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=181696.0
milhouse24
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2340
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 05, 2012, 02:00:13 pm »
Ignore

For the voters, it only matters on who he picks as Vice President. 

A vice president with a lot of experience is usually seen as a good thing for the ticket, and can serve to balance out any inexperience or naivete on the president.
Logged
Erc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4685
Slovenia


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 05, 2012, 02:22:19 pm »
Ignore

For the voters, it only matters on who he picks as Vice President. 

A vice president with a lot of experience is usually seen as a good thing for the ticket, and can serve to balance out any inexperience or naivete on the president.

...or draw to attention your own youth and inexperience (see Bentsen, L.)
Logged
milhouse24
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2340
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 06, 2012, 04:10:20 pm »
Ignore

For the voters, it only matters on who he picks as Vice President. 

A vice president with a lot of experience is usually seen as a good thing for the ticket, and can serve to balance out any inexperience or naivete on the president.

...or draw to attention your own youth and inexperience (see Bentsen, L.)
Dukakis was leading the polls against the wimpy GHWB.  It was only after huge negative ad spending that Bush pulled it out.  They were both bad candidates, but it wasn't Bentsen's fault.
Logged
Politico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4886
View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 06, 2012, 04:27:01 pm »
Ignore

For the voters, it only matters on who he picks as Vice President. 

A vice president with a lot of experience is usually seen as a good thing for the ticket, and can serve to balance out any inexperience or naivete on the president.

...or draw to attention your own youth and inexperience (see Bentsen, L.)
Dukakis was leading the polls against the wimpy GHWB.  It was only after huge negative ad spending that Bush pulled it out.  They were both bad candidates, but it wasn't Bentsen's fault.

Yeah, the Willie Horton ads and Dukakis' gaffe in the debate ("if Kitty Dukakis was raped and murdered, would you support the death penalty for the perpetrator?" or however it was worded) did him in. Bentsen had nothing to do with the loss, and totally annihilated Quayle in the veep debate.
Logged

"Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."

- Bastiat
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines