Ninth Circuit rules Prop 8 unconstitutional.
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2024, 01:48:53 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: The Dowager Mod, Chancellor Tanterterg)
  Ninth Circuit rules Prop 8 unconstitutional.
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5
Author Topic: Ninth Circuit rules Prop 8 unconstitutional.  (Read 6481 times)
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #50 on: February 07, 2012, 11:22:12 PM »

You have to determine that a fetus is a legal person first if you want to use the Fourteenth that way.

Nobody of note has ever denied that gays and lesbians are legal persons.

Give JCL time.
Logged
Хahar 🤔
Xahar
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 41,731
Bangladesh


Political Matrix
E: -6.77, S: 0.61

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #51 on: February 08, 2012, 01:19:15 AM »

I turned on the TV a minute ago and saw a guy I know speaking. His parents were plaintiffs in the case. This is the closest I've ever been to being tangentially related to something interesting, so that's cool.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #52 on: February 08, 2012, 01:58:45 AM »
« Edited: February 08, 2012, 02:00:56 AM by True Federalist »

The will of the people of California is that gay marriage be banned. The Federal Government has no right to legislate from the bench. Article One Section Eight of the Constitution says nothing regarding social issues thus the Tenth Amendment is invoked thus the Ninth Circuit was in the wrong regarding this decision. They said it (the ban) violates the 14th Amendment. If the left wants to play that game, we on the right can use that to ban ALL abortions.

Given how the XIVth Amendment indirectly defines personhood with its definition of citizen, a XIVth Amendment based decision could lead to all abortions being legal, including those of fetuses that have reached viability.
Logged
🐒Gods of Prosperity🔱🐲💸
shua
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 25,680
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 1.29, S: -0.70

WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #53 on: February 08, 2012, 07:10:03 AM »

To suggest the possibility at any time is paranoia.

We're psychologising the use of counterfactuals to pose a contrast now? 

Philosophy professors everywhere, you are forewarned. 
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #54 on: February 08, 2012, 01:52:10 PM »

Its idiotic to argue over the semantics of marriage if someone wants to change the definition of marriage to mean platonic marriage. 

We should all just follow the rules of "Common Law Marriage" or "natural marriage by nature"

If a man and a woman live together and have a biological child, then they are married by the rules and regulations of Common Law Marriage.  Its really is that simple!

If a man impregnates a woman, while there may not be a legal contract, there should be a social and moral contract forcing the man to financially provide for the woman and his biological children.  Its really that simple! 

Everyone else is just looking for government handouts and protection from whatever. 
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,374


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #55 on: February 08, 2012, 01:54:25 PM »

I was with you until the last paragraph. 'Government handouts and protection from whatever' are perfectly reasonable things for two people who want to live and enjoy life together to seek.
Logged
Bacon King
Atlas Politician
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 18,829
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.63, S: -9.49

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #56 on: February 08, 2012, 02:29:15 PM »
« Edited: February 08, 2012, 02:31:06 PM by Bacon King, VP »

The will of the people of California is that gay marriage be banned. The Federal Government has no right to legislate from the bench. Article One Section Eight of the Constituition says nothing regarding social issues thus the Tenth Amendment is invoked thus the Ninth Circuit was in the wrong regarding this decision. They said it (the ban) violates the 14th Amendment. If the left wants to play that game, we on the right can use that to ban ALL abortions.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

How is taking the right to get married away from gays not a state "making or enforcing a law abridging the priveleges... of citizens of the United States," and how exactly can you ban abortion with an amendment that defines personhood at birth?
Logged
SUSAN CRUSHBONE
a Person
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,735
Antarctica


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #57 on: February 08, 2012, 03:49:06 PM »

The will of the people of California is that gay marriage be banned. The Federal Government has no right to legislate from the bench. Article One Section Eight of the Constituition says nothing regarding social issues thus the Tenth Amendment is invoked thus the Ninth Circuit was in the wrong regarding this decision. They said it (the ban) violates the 14th Amendment. If the left wants to play that game, we on the right can use that to ban ALL abortions.

Quote from: Restricted
You must be logged in to read this quote.

How is taking the right to get married away from gays not a state "making or enforcing a law abridging the priveleges... of citizens of the United States,"
Well, tbf, if you take that literally, it means that no state could ever raise taxes, because that would be making a low abridging the privileges of some citizens to pay low taxes.
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #58 on: February 08, 2012, 05:33:34 PM »

52% isn't the "will of the people."  I'm not a fan of populist bullshart.
Logged
Ban my account ffs!
snowguy716
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,632
Austria


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #59 on: February 08, 2012, 05:44:57 PM »

The will of the people of California is that gay marriage be banned. The Federal Government has no right to legislate from the bench. Article One Section Eight of the Constituition says nothing regarding social issues thus the Tenth Amendment is invoked thus the Ninth Circuit was in the wrong regarding this decision. They said it (the ban) violates the 14th Amendment. If the left wants to play that game, we on the right can use that to ban ALL abortions.
The will of the people is utterly meaningless and irrelevant in private matters that do not affect "the people" in any way whatsoever.

The will of the North Korean People is that eternal president great leader Kim Il Sung be forever praised for bringing glory to the working Korean people....

The will of the North Korean People can go straight down to hell in this case as far as I'm concerned, along with all the prying eyes of uptight bigots who can't keep their hands out of other peoples' bedrooms.
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #60 on: February 08, 2012, 06:08:07 PM »

A liberal muslim homosexual ACLU lawyer professor and abortion doctor was teaching a class on Karl Marx.

"Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship Marx and accept that he was the most highly-evolved being the world has ever known, even greater than Jesus Christ!"

At this moment, a brave, patriotic, pro-life Navy SEAL champion who had served 1500 tours of duty and understood the necessity of war and fully supported all military decision made by the United States stood up and held up a rock.

"How old is this rock?"

The arrogant professor smirked quite Jewishly and smugly replied, "4.6 billion years, you stupid Christian".

"Wrong. It's been 5,000 years since God created it. If it was 4.6 billion years old and evolution, as you say, is real... then it should be an animal now"

The professor was visibly shaken, and dropped his chalk and copy of Origin of the Species. He stormed out of the room crying those liberal crocodile tears.

The students applauded and all registered Republican that day and accepted Jesus as their lord and savior. An eagle named "Small Government" flew into the room and perched atop the American Flag and shed a tear on the chalk. The pledge of allegiance was read several times, and God himself showed up and enacted a flat tax rate across the country.

The professor lost his tenure and was fired the next day. He died of the gay plague AIDS and was tossed into the lake of fire for all eternity.
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,073
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #61 on: February 08, 2012, 06:25:32 PM »

^ True story.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #62 on: February 08, 2012, 06:27:14 PM »

The will of the people of California is that gay marriage be banned. The Federal Government has no right to legislate from the bench. Article One Section Eight of the Constituition says nothing regarding social issues thus the Tenth Amendment is invoked thus the Ninth Circuit was in the wrong regarding this decision. They said it (the ban) violates the 14th Amendment. If the left wants to play that game, we on the right can use that to ban ALL abortions.

The will of white Mississippians was that them uppity negro-folk stay in their place. So was the end of Jim Crow wrong?
Logged
opebo
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 47,009


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #63 on: February 08, 2012, 07:29:47 PM »

The will of the people of California is that gay marriage be banned. The Federal Government has no right to legislate from the bench. Article One Section Eight of the Constituition says nothing regarding social issues thus the Tenth Amendment is invoked thus the Ninth Circuit was in the wrong regarding this decision. They said it (the ban) violates the 14th Amendment. If the left wants to play that game, we on the right can use that to ban ALL abortions.

The will of white Mississippians was that them uppity negro-folk stay in their place. So was the end of Jim Crow wrong?

The lesson is rather obvious - democracy is bad.
Logged
Fmr President & Senator Polnut
polnut
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,489
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -2.71, S: -5.22

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #64 on: February 08, 2012, 07:54:19 PM »

To suggest the possibility at any time is paranoia.

We're psychologising the use of counterfactuals to pose a contrast now? 

Philosophy professors everywhere, you are forewarned. 

Indeed...

Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #65 on: February 08, 2012, 08:35:14 PM »

lol.

Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #66 on: February 08, 2012, 09:16:31 PM »


Bawwwwwwwwwwwww

A liberal muslim homosexual ACLU lawyer professor and abortion doctor was teaching a class on Karl Marx.

"Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship Marx and accept that he was the most highly-evolved being the world has ever known, even greater than Jesus Christ!"

At this moment, a brave, patriotic, pro-life Navy SEAL champion who had served 1500 tours of duty and understood the necessity of war and fully supported all military decision made by the United States stood up and held up a rock.

"How old is this rock?"

The arrogant professor smirked quite Jewishly and smugly replied, "4.6 billion years, you stupid Christian".

"Wrong. It's been 5,000 years since God created it. If it was 4.6 billion years old and evolution, as you say, is real... then it should be an animal now"

The professor was visibly shaken, and dropped his chalk and copy of Origin of the Species. He stormed out of the room crying those liberal crocodile tears.

The students applauded and all registered Republican that day and accepted Jesus as their lord and savior. An eagle named "Small Government" flew into the room and perched atop the American Flag and shed a tear on the chalk. The pledge of allegiance was read several times, and God himself showed up and enacted a flat tax rate across the country.

The professor lost his tenure and was fired the next day. He died of the gay plague AIDS and was tossed into the lake of fire for all eternity.

*clap clap*
Logged
The Mikado
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,736


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #67 on: February 08, 2012, 09:22:55 PM »

A liberal muslim homosexual ACLU lawyer professor and abortion doctor was teaching a class on Karl Marx.

"Before the class begins, you must get on your knees and worship Marx and accept that he was the most highly-evolved being the world has ever known, even greater than Jesus Christ!"

At this moment, a brave, patriotic, pro-life Navy SEAL champion who had served 1500 tours of duty and understood the necessity of war and fully supported all military decision made by the United States stood up and held up a rock.

"How old is this rock?"

The arrogant professor smirked quite Jewishly and smugly replied, "4.6 billion years, you stupid Christian".

"Wrong. It's been 5,000 years since God created it. If it was 4.6 billion years old and evolution, as you say, is real... then it should be an animal now"

The professor was visibly shaken, and dropped his chalk and copy of Origin of the Species. He stormed out of the room crying those liberal crocodile tears.

The students applauded and all registered Republican that day and accepted Jesus as their lord and savior. An eagle named "Small Government" flew into the room and perched atop the American Flag and shed a tear on the chalk. The pledge of allegiance was read several times, and God himself showed up and enacted a flat tax rate across the country.

The professor lost his tenure and was fired the next day. He died of the gay plague AIDS and was tossed into the lake of fire for all eternity.

That student grew up to be Albert Einstein, who became famous for proving that compound interest in the most powerful force in the universe.
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,704


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #68 on: February 09, 2012, 01:24:15 AM »

52% isn't the "will of the people."  I'm not a fan of populist bullshart.

And that 52% was of the people who showed up to vote over 3 years ago. I bet a Proposition repealing it could pass if it was on the ballot this November.
Logged
Oswald Acted Alone, You Kook
The Obamanation
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,853
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #69 on: February 09, 2012, 10:11:48 AM »

Aww.... this means it's not going to be state-by-state, which is more exciting.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,374


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #70 on: February 09, 2012, 03:27:35 PM »

It doesn't mean that. The ruling was tailored to (a) specify that the situation discussed was just the one in California through reference to the specifics of what was done there and (b) make the Supremes less inclined to grant cert.
Logged
milhouse24
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,331
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #71 on: February 09, 2012, 06:35:03 PM »

There are serious legal and bureaucratic issues faced with implementing gay marriage on a federal and national level.  Even if gay marriage was legalized nationally, it will take several years for gay marriage to be implemented among the many government programs that it effects.  Federal regulators are correct in analyzing how it effects state governments at the local level before deciding if it can be implemented on a federal level.  There are significant legal issues that differ between state and national laws, and while it may seem like happy times for gay marriage supporters, it will be a bureaucratic nightmare for federal employees tasked with enforcing the rules and regulations of spousal agreements. 
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,374


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #72 on: February 09, 2012, 06:43:01 PM »

There are serious legal and bureaucratic issues faced with implementing gay marriage on a federal and national level.  Even if gay marriage was legalized nationally, it will take several years for gay marriage to be implemented among the many government programs that it effects.  Federal regulators are correct in analyzing how it effects state governments at the local level before deciding if it can be implemented on a federal level.  There are significant legal issues that differ between state and national laws, and while it may seem like happy times for gay marriage supporters, it will be a bureaucratic nightmare for federal employees tasked with enforcing the rules and regulations of spousal agreements. 

Two questions:

How?
Why?
Logged
Free Palestine
FallenMorgan
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,022
United States
Political Matrix
E: -10.00, S: -10.00

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #73 on: February 09, 2012, 08:00:08 PM »

There are serious legal and bureaucratic issues faced with implementing gay marriage on a federal and national level.  Even if gay marriage was legalized nationally, it will take several years for gay marriage to be implemented among the many government programs that it effects.  Federal regulators are correct in analyzing how it effects state governments at the local level before deciding if it can be implemented on a federal level.  There are significant legal issues that differ between state and national laws, and while it may seem like happy times for gay marriage supporters, it will be a bureaucratic nightmare for federal employees tasked with enforcing the rules and regulations of spousal agreements. 

No it won't.  Marriage will legally be the same fecking thing, just with the requirement of a penis or a vagina removed.

Hurr
Logged
Grumpier Than Thou
20RP12
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 38,319
United States
Political Matrix
E: -5.29, S: -7.13

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #74 on: February 09, 2012, 08:04:18 PM »



/thread
Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.076 seconds with 12 queries.