PPP: Santorum beating Romney in Michigan
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 17, 2024, 07:54:34 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  PPP: Santorum beating Romney in Michigan
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3
Author Topic: PPP: Santorum beating Romney in Michigan  (Read 7063 times)
© tweed
Miamiu1027
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 36,562
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #25 on: February 10, 2012, 09:06:08 PM »

Wait until Santorum runs up insane margins on Staten Island and Upstate...

Staten Island absolutely not.  $ > guidos.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #26 on: February 10, 2012, 09:13:25 PM »

Where's politico?
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,455
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #27 on: February 10, 2012, 09:16:16 PM »

Wait until Santorum runs up insane margins on Staten Island and Upstate...

He could do well upstate. He'd get squashed on SI.
Logged
Lief 🗽
Lief
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,918


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #28 on: February 10, 2012, 09:17:19 PM »

I hope Paul wins the hipster precincts in Brooklyn.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,455
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #29 on: February 10, 2012, 09:18:39 PM »

I hope Paul wins the hipster precincts in Brooklyn.

Paul carries Williamsburg in a landslide!

(Actually I can't imagine many of the hipsters there being registered Republicans so...)
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #30 on: February 10, 2012, 09:20:38 PM »

Wait until Santorum runs up insane margins on Staten Island and Upstate...

Staten Island absolutely not.  $ > guidos.

Ah, I didn't think the wealth outweighed the Italians. I also forgot about the party machine...
Logged
Volrath50
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 814
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #31 on: February 10, 2012, 09:20:46 PM »


His programming is not designed to deal with something like this. He crashed, and the Romney campaign has been working furiously to reboot him ASAP.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,455
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #32 on: February 10, 2012, 09:23:40 PM »

How vicious do you people think Romney will get in MI?

He is going to be desperate for a hardy win in a competitive state, especially if he loses to Ron Paul (lol) tomorrow.
Logged
Snowstalker Mk. II
Snowstalker
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 20,414
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -4.35

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #33 on: February 10, 2012, 09:25:44 PM »

OH sh**t

Sadly, Moneybags Mitt will turn it around after some ads.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #34 on: February 10, 2012, 09:32:05 PM »

I'm seriously contemplating buying Santorum to win the nomination at this point.
Should have b ought him when those MN results started coming in(or even earlier when PPP polled Santorum winning MN).
Logged
TomC
TCash101
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,973


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #35 on: February 10, 2012, 10:00:44 PM »

yeah it's nowhere near the ballgame.  it would just mean that we may have to drop the term 'frontrunner' from his name.  he has firewalls in AZ on the 28th and MA/VT/VA on 3/6.

I wouldn't be completely shocked if something weird happened in VT but I agree otherwise.

Also, I have a very hard time seeing Santorum compete with Romney in places like New York and California no matter what happens in MI.

Sure, but Hillary Clinton won Cal and NY and those two state are less delegate rich for the GOP.
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #36 on: February 10, 2012, 10:03:51 PM »

Paladino won in NY. Eastern Cali will have more clout with only Republicans. Santorum will be able to compete in both of them.
Logged
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #37 on: February 10, 2012, 11:03:15 PM »

Mittens is no Rick Lazio. Paladino won because NY Republicans didn't want to nominate some washed-out down-stater whose last major accomplishment was losing to Hillary Clinton. Paladino could not gave won the primary without unusually high enthusiasm upstate + low enthusiasm downstate. Santorum can't take advantage of the regional divide in the same way.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #38 on: February 10, 2012, 11:05:41 PM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Congrats Phil.

Santorum needs to go all shock 'n' awe. How's mittens doing in WA? 
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,156
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #39 on: February 10, 2012, 11:08:55 PM »

Mittens is no Rick Lazio. Paladino won because NY Republicans didn't want to nominate some washed-out down-stater whose last major accomplishment was losing to Hillary Clinton. Paladino could not gave won the primary without unusually high enthusiasm upstate + low enthusiasm downstate. Santorum can't take advantage of the regional divide in the same way.


Why not?  I've seen no evidence that anyone other than Politico is all that enthused about Romney.
Logged
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #40 on: February 10, 2012, 11:12:27 PM »

Mittens is no Rick Lazio. Paladino won because NY Republicans didn't want to nominate some washed-out down-stater whose last major accomplishment was losing to Hillary Clinton. Paladino could not gave won the primary without unusually high enthusiasm upstate + low enthusiasm downstate. Santorum can't take advantage of the regional divide in the same way.


Why not?  I've seen no evidence that anyone other than Politico is all that enthused about Romney.

Lazio was way worse, but I'll re-state what I'm asserting in a more careful way: If it's possible for Santorum to win NY, his victory will not be the product of the same factors that led to Paladino's upset.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #41 on: February 10, 2012, 11:16:10 PM »

Didn't Lazio literally not campaign anywhere except Long Island?
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #42 on: February 10, 2012, 11:18:08 PM »

This is insane.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #43 on: February 10, 2012, 11:21:07 PM »

Santorum only down by 2 in CA according to PPP!

Wait, where do you see that?  I just checked their Twitter feed, and don't see that anywhere.  And I don't think they're even polling California at the moment.  They're doing a national poll, so I guess they might have a California subsample from that, but it would have a huge MoE.
Logged
Averroës Nix
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,289
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #44 on: February 10, 2012, 11:21:38 PM »

Didn't Lazio literally not campaign anywhere except Long Island?

Yes, he campaigned Coakley-style, expecting that the machine would hand him the primary on a silver platter.
Logged
greenforest32
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,625


Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #45 on: February 10, 2012, 11:22:00 PM »

Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,759


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #46 on: February 10, 2012, 11:23:19 PM »

Santorum only down by 2 in CA according to PPP!

Wait, where do you see that?  I just checked their Twitter feed, and don't see that anywhere.  And I don't think they're even polling California at the moment.  They're doing a national poll, so I guess they might have a California subsample from that, but it would have a huge MoE.


I don't see it either.
Logged
Keystone Phil
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 52,607


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #47 on: February 10, 2012, 11:24:02 PM »

Santorum only down by 2 in CA according to PPP!

Wait, where do you see that?  I just checked their Twitter feed, and don't see that anywhere.  And I don't think they're even polling California at the moment.  They're doing a national poll, so I guess they might have a California subsample from that, but it would have a huge MoE.


A friend of mine sent me the result right after I told him about the MI poll. He didn't specify the poll though. It turns out it's a Survey USA poll.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,759


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #48 on: February 10, 2012, 11:25:33 PM »

Ok, I found it. Will enter soon.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,759


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #49 on: February 10, 2012, 11:28:29 PM »

There is now a thread about the CA poll on the Pres Prim Polls board.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.042 seconds with 13 queries.