Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 03, 2015, 05:40:36 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2004 U.S. Presidential Election
| | |-+  Open Topic....2008
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: Open Topic....2008  (Read 6656 times)
zachman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2102


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: November 04, 2004, 07:29:24 pm »
Ignore

My thoughts:
I'm hoping right now for Mark Warner to win. He is a governor and that will continue to be an advantage as Bush will set up trap votes for the congress. I would however like Jim Nelson to be VP.

For the Republicans:

It is clear that Bill Frist has Presidential ambitions. He will get slewn in NH to a Romney (who will be voted out of office in 2006) type and the Republicans will start the process of getting rid of NH as the first in the nation primary and NH will move to the political status of Maine.
Logged

I'm a proud NH Primary voter for 2008.

Harry Reid 08'

"As some warn victory, some downfall
Private reasons great or small
Can be seen in the eyes of those that call
To make all that should be killed to crawl
While others say don't hate nothing at all
Except hatred."
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #26 on: November 04, 2004, 07:36:23 pm »
Ignore

Warner would lose his home state. I don't see him running for president. If he runs for the U.S. Senate, he'll lose.

New Hampshire doesn't like tax-and-spend liberals. I think these people wanted deadlock more than anything else.
Logged
AuH2O
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4246


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: November 04, 2004, 09:01:20 pm »
Ignore

Romney will win in 06, and if he doesn't, his Prez ambitions are over.
Logged

don't forget to remember, the devil's got pills in his eyes

look, laugh, but don't touch... cut you down to size
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #28 on: November 04, 2004, 09:02:33 pm »
Ignore

I agree. I'm not sure he'll win, but I mean on the second part.
Logged
patrick1
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7878


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: November 04, 2004, 09:41:33 pm »
Ignore

The Republicans should be grooming a Latino/Latina V.P. candidate for 2008.  Exit polls have shown that Republicans have done much better with Hispanic voters this time but they need to do more.  Demographics are clear that the white population is shrinking in proportion.  The Republicans have failed to make any inroads in the balck community and we cannot let that happen with the hispanic poulation.
Logged
No more McShame
FuturePrez R-AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1092


View Profile
« Reply #30 on: November 04, 2004, 10:34:13 pm »
Ignore

Any ideas on a specific person Patrick?  I can't think of one offhand.  Maybe Mel Martinez but he'll only be in the Senate for 4 years by 2008.
Logged

Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.31

My political view's summarized
patrick1
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7878


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: November 04, 2004, 10:47:28 pm »
Ignore

Any ideas on a specific person Patrick?  I can't think of one offhand.  Maybe Mel Martinez but he'll only be in the Senate for 4 years by 2008.

No one really comes to mind and I think that is a problem.  There are just not that many Hispanic Republicans in prominent positions.  Henry Bonilla is one.  Republicans have been making efforts and in-roads and they should continue. 
Logged
J. J.
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 32065
United States


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: November 04, 2004, 10:52:32 pm »
Ignore

Any ideas on a specific person Patrick? I can't think of one offhand. Maybe Mel Martinez but he'll only be in the Senate for 4 years by 2008.

Martinez was born in Cuba; he isn't eligible.

Logged

J. J.

"Actually, .. now that you mention it...." 
- Londo Molari

"Every government are parliaments of whores.
The trouble is, in a democracy the whores are us." - P. J. O'Rourke

"Wa sala, wa lala."

(Zulu for, "You snooze, you lose.")
No more McShame
FuturePrez R-AZ
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1092


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: November 04, 2004, 11:02:22 pm »
Ignore

I didn't know he was born there, thanks for pointing that out J.J.
Logged

Political Compass
Economic Left/Right: 7.00
Social Libertarian/Authoritarian: 0.31

My political view's summarized
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #34 on: November 04, 2004, 11:04:30 pm »
Ignore

Wasn't Cuba a U.S. territory for a while?
Logged
MODU
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22087
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #35 on: November 04, 2004, 11:40:14 pm »
Ignore

Wasn't Cuba a U.S. territory for a while?

Following the Spanish-American war in 1898, the US occupied the country of Cuba until the US turned over control in 1902.  In 1903, the Cuban-American treaty set up the framework for relations between the two countries, including the ceding of Guantanamo Bay to the US as a military base to protect the island nation.

Just as throughout the history of the US, we turn over nations we occupy following the end of a war.  Just think, if we haven't, the US would also include nations such as the Philippines (I could actually use my Tagalog more) and Germany. 
Logged

Attention bloggers:  Join SeededBuzz and gain access to thousands of new readers.  Simply paste a link and summary of your article for community members to link back to, drawing more activity to your site.  Membership is FREE!

Visit MODU's Musings


"Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done and President Bush, let them go to hell." - Betty Dawisha, Iraqi vote
WalterMitty
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21626


Political Matrix
E: 1.68, S: -2.26

View Profile
« Reply #36 on: November 05, 2004, 06:06:10 pm »
Ignore

rarely does the early front runner actually win the nomination.  we should be focusing on the darkhorse candidates.

george allen is a real darkhorse that could be a very viable candidate in the republican primaries.

Logged

Sibboleth
Realpolitik
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58873
United Kingdom


View Profile WWW
« Reply #37 on: November 05, 2004, 06:23:05 pm »
Ignore

rarely does the early front runner actually win the nomination. we should be focusing on the darkhorse candidates

Wrong. Howard Dean was the Democratic nominee this year, and it was like a horrific slow-motion repeat of 1972... ;-)

Seriously now... you're right about that. I like the idea of President Finegold... probably a pipe dream though :-(
Logged

"Whatsoever Aristotle may have thought of this, I do not care"

William of Occam
Chicago103
Newbie
*
Posts: 6


View Profile
« Reply #38 on: November 08, 2004, 04:18:17 am »
Ignore

Quote from: struct310
reps i wouldnt support
Guiliani and Pataki-too liberal on social issues, great leaders, but other reps are great leaders too

[quote

I would be willing to bet serious money that not only will Guiliani run, but that he will change his position on abortion within the next four years.

Guiliani already changed his position on abortion.  Early on in his career when he was considering running for mayor he wanted to overturn roe vs. wade and was pretty pro-life.  Of course being mayor of a big city it doesnt really matter what ones position on abortion is.  However once Rudy started running for the Senate he changed his position on abortion and became pro-choice because he didnt want Hillary to take away votes from him.  I think he might make a compromise with abortion such as supporting a partial birth abortion ban yet still supporting some abortions.
Logged
Umengus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1953
Belgium


View Profile
« Reply #39 on: November 08, 2004, 04:57:40 am »
Ignore

1) all Gop candidates seem better (for me) than W. But maybe less effective to attract the Gop base, the decisive factor in the last election.

2)Cheney was not a better VP than Edwards. The fact is the VP doesn't count (for this election).

3)For the dem ticket, my wish goes to Edwards/clinton or Edwards/Dean (the best ticket for this year). But latinos are important and I am considering a "latino candidate" on the ticket: Rochardson has the lead but why not Salazar? or a new senator 06? (hence Edwards/richardson)

Moreover, Obama on the ticket would seem good to mobilize the black people but I think that he will have the same problem than Edwards: he will be attached.
Logged

Re: France 2012: the official thread
Reply #622 on: July 25, 2011, 04:44:20 pm  

Quote from: Umengus on July 25, 2011, 03:19:09 pm

against Aubry, Sarkozy will win. Aubry is a very bad candidate for prime time : no charisma, no sympathy, muslim connection, stupid ideas,... and sarkozy is a good candidate...

but against hollande, sarkozy will lose."

Censured by REALPOLITIK due to "offensive content".

"It ought to be noted that there's no freedom of speech here." xahar
Lunar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30443
Ireland, Republic of
View Profile
« Reply #40 on: November 08, 2004, 05:16:56 am »
Ignore

Harry Reid is a possibility on the Democratic side.  If, as minority leader, he can pull strings and get party activists on his side, he could take Iowa.
Logged

this is real
MODU
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22087
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #41 on: November 08, 2004, 07:59:27 am »
Ignore


2)Cheney was not a better VP than Edwards. The fact is the VP doesn't count (for this election).


I guess that shots a hole in Shira's rant that Cheney was actually running the country for the last 4 years.  hahaha
Logged

Attention bloggers:  Join SeededBuzz and gain access to thousands of new readers.  Simply paste a link and summary of your article for community members to link back to, drawing more activity to your site.  Membership is FREE!

Visit MODU's Musings


"Anybody who doesn't appreciate what America has done and President Bush, let them go to hell." - Betty Dawisha, Iraqi vote
Andrew
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 339
United States


View Profile
« Reply #42 on: November 08, 2004, 01:50:41 pm »
Ignore

Yeesh...a little early, eh? I remember right after Al Gore conceded in 2000 that commentators immediately began talking about who was going to run in 2004. John Kerry was nowhere on their radars.

"Among the Democrats who have been mentioned as possible candidates in 2004 are Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, Mr. Gore's running mate, and Senators John Edwards of North Carolina, John Kerry of Massachusetts, Bob Kerrey of Nebraska, Mrs. Clinton, Mr. Biden, Mr. Gephardt, Mr. Daschle, Gov. Gray Davis of California, and Gov. Tom Vilsack of Iowa.

"And no one seems to be ruling out Mr. Gore."

--The New York Times, Dec. 17, 2000
Logged
Shira
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1860


View Profile
« Reply #43 on: November 08, 2004, 02:24:27 pm »
Ignore

LIKELY RUNNERS

George Pataki
Rudy Giuliani
Mitt Romney

TICKET I WANT::::

Giuliani/Rice

The Religious Right will never approve Giuliani
Logged

Understand, ye brutish among the people:and ye fools, when will ye be wise?
___________
Psalm 94:8
A18
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23836
Political Matrix
E: 9.23, S: -6.35

View Profile
« Reply #44 on: November 08, 2004, 02:29:46 pm »
Ignore

Al Gore could pull a Nixon and run again in 2008. I don't see him winning the nomination, though.
Logged
National Progressive
General Mung Beans
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6828
Korea, Republic of


Political Matrix
E: -6.58, S: -1.91

View Profile
« Reply #45 on: May 29, 2015, 03:50:28 am »
Ignore

LIKELY RUNNERS

George Pataki
Rudy Giuliani
Mitt Romney


Well your wishes have been completely fulfilled now.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines