Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 21, 2013, 02:35:42 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderator: muon2)
| | |-+  Ten Largest Cities in 50 Years
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Ten Largest Cities in 50 Years  (Read 405 times)
Rockefeller
Republican95
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 882


Political Matrix
E: 1.94, S: 3.48

View Profile
« on: February 20, 2012, 07:43:31 pm »
Ignore

What will be the ten largest cities fifty years from now?

Here are my projections:

1 )    New York City, New York
2 )    Los Angeles, California
3 )    Houston, Texas
4 )    Phoenix, Arizona
5 )    Chicago, Illinois   
6 )    San Antonio, Texas
7 )    San Jose, California
8 )    San Diego, California
9 )    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
10 )  Dallas, Texas
Logged
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11596


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2012, 07:45:54 pm »
Ignore

Metro or city limits?
Logged

The only thing that is certain is that he's a douche! What he will infract is uncetain.
traininthedistance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1054


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2012, 12:19:22 am »
Ignore

What will be the ten largest cities fifty years from now?

Here are my projections:

1 )    New York City, New York
2 )    Los Angeles, California
3 )    Houston, Texas
4 )    Phoenix, Arizona
5 )    Chicago, Illinois    
6 )    San Antonio, Texas
7 )    San Jose, California
8 )    San Diego, California
9 )    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
10 )  Dallas, Texas

I expect water issues to severely constrain Phoenix's growth sometime within the next couple of decades.  They will eventually hit all of the sunbelt cities, but not quite as hard or fast.

In general, environmental factors will eventually reverse the long-term trend of south and west migration, as people will move north and east where there is abundant rainfall, reasonable temperatures, and (possibly) an urban form friendly to a post-oil world. However, it very well may take 100 years rather than 50 for most of the cities here, and the ability of many south and west cities to annex their hinterlands will keep their numbers up.  So only Phoenix seems that out of place.

I think Columbus is a dark-horse option for the top 10, actually.  Unlike most of the Midwest, it's still growing; it can expand its borders as needed; and if I'm right about water issues forcing an end to Sunbelt migration then it could stand to benefit.
« Last Edit: February 21, 2012, 09:16:37 am by traininthedistance »Logged

Economic: -4.00
Social: -6.26

Gravis Marketing
brittain33
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11978


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2012, 08:24:26 am »
Ignore

Of those cities, I think only San Antonio and Houston have scope for further annexation and expansion, while the others are stuck with their current boundaries.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory