AZ PrimR: ARG: Santorum might give Romney a run for his money
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 02:39:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
  AZ PrimR: ARG: Santorum might give Romney a run for his money
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: AZ PrimR: ARG: Santorum might give Romney a run for his money  (Read 1854 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 15, 2012, 01:11:59 PM »

New Poll: Arizona President by ARG on 2012-02-14

Summary:
Romney:
38%
Santorum:
31%
Gingrich:
15%
Paul:
11%
Other:
0%
Undecided:
5%

Poll Source URL: Full Poll Details

Romney leads Santorum 37% to 32% among likely Republican primary voters saying they will definitely or probably vote in the February 28 primary.



Romney leads Gingrich 61% to 17% among the 4% of Republican primary voters saying they have already voted.
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,178
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 15, 2012, 01:14:33 PM »

4% of 600 have already voted = 24 people

MoE = +/- 30% ?
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 15, 2012, 01:15:56 PM »

4% of 600 have already voted = 24 people

MoE = +/- 30% ?

Meaningless unless Romney wins by less than 4%.
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 15, 2012, 02:27:32 PM »

4% of 600 have already voted = 24 people

MoE = +/- 30% ?

Huh?
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: February 15, 2012, 02:45:59 PM »

Well Santorum isn't spending time or money in AZ so it appears he is ceding it to Romney, at least for now. It is high risk for him to play there as it is WTA
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: February 15, 2012, 05:12:42 PM »


Only 4% of respondents indicate that they've early voted.  4% of 600 people is about 24 people.  A sample size of n=24 has a giant MoE (although closer to +/-20%)
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: February 15, 2012, 05:33:02 PM »


Only 4% of respondents indicate that they've early voted.  4% of 600 people is about 24 people.  A sample size of n=24 has a giant MoE (although closer to +/-20%)

I get that, but what's his point?
Logged
Alcon
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 30,866
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: February 15, 2012, 05:50:33 PM »


Only 4% of respondents indicate that they've early voted.  4% of 600 people is about 24 people.  A sample size of n=24 has a giant MoE (although closer to +/-20%)

I get that, but what's his point?

I assume his point is that it's essentially super-useless information.
Logged
tmthforu94
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 22,402
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.26, S: -4.52

P P P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: February 15, 2012, 10:21:23 PM »

Surprised Santorum seems to be ceding Arizona, but I'll take it.
Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: February 15, 2012, 10:53:57 PM »

Surprised Santorum seems to be ceding Arizona, but I'll take it.

Lots of Mormons and anti-immigrant types who don't care much about social issues (not to say they are social liberals or anything). It's not good territory for Santorum plus it's WTA. The Republican party made sure everything was favorable for Romney..... how many states in the south or midwest are WTA?
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: February 15, 2012, 11:15:30 PM »

It's not good territory for Santorum plus it's WTA. The Republican party made sure everything was favorable for Romney..... how many states in the south or midwest are WTA?

Only a handful of states and territories are statewide WTA.  Here they are:

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

Everything else is either WTA by congressional district, proportional representation, or some kind of hybrid, with the hybrid category being the most common.

Logged
Sbane
sbane
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,303


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: February 15, 2012, 11:30:18 PM »

Which ones are proportional?
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,797
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: February 16, 2012, 02:03:07 AM »

I thought Virginia is also WTA.
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,760


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: February 16, 2012, 02:28:06 AM »


VA is a hybrid with WTA by CD.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,459
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: February 16, 2012, 02:31:57 AM »

If Santorum isn't leading Romney here now, I doubt he ever will. Santorum's people were probably correct in writing this one off.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: February 16, 2012, 03:26:48 AM »


It really depends on what you consider "proportional", as the exact rules vary a lot from state to state.  It's true though that in the South, there are more states that are closer to being proportional than the rest of the country.  Texas, for example, is proportional by the statewide vote, but with a minimum threshold of 20%.  So if you get 19%, then you get nothing.

Many of the states are "conditional WTA", which means that it's proportional as long as no one wins more than 50% of the vote, but if the winner breaks 50%, then it becomes WTA.  Anyway, here's a table that tries to summarize things:

http://frontloading.blogspot.com.au/2011/12/republican-delegate-allocation-rules.html
Logged
King
intermoderate
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 29,356
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: February 16, 2012, 11:55:00 AM »

Santorum can win this state on the 22nd without spending a dime.
Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,797
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: February 16, 2012, 12:19:33 PM »

If Gingrich is smart he should spend all his time and money in Arizona.
With Romney and Santorum duking it out in Michigan, he might be able to pull a surprise that will revive his campaign.
Logged
Likely Voter
Moderators
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,344


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: February 16, 2012, 01:22:21 PM »

If Gingrich is smart he should spend all his time and money in Arizona.
With Romney and Santorum duking it out in Michigan, he might be able to pull a surprise that will revive his campaign.

Romney is already spending money in AZ and would spend more if they were challenged. Plus Romney is spending money in GA (as is Santorum) and if Gingrich has any chance, he has to win his home state so they have to spend their few remaining $ on GA (he is also looking at OH as their one non GA Super Tuesday state). Of course if Sheldon Adelson gives Gingrich's SuperPAC $10M, maybe they will start to spread it around more.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.04 seconds with 14 queries.