Ten Largest Cities in 50 Years
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 02:06:58 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Politics
  Political Geography & Demographics (Moderators: muon2, 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Ten Largest Cities in 50 Years
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Ten Largest Cities in 50 Years  (Read 648 times)
Del Tachi
Republican95
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 17,864
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.52, S: 1.46

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: February 20, 2012, 07:43:31 PM »

What will be the ten largest cities fifty years from now?

Here are my projections:

1 )    New York City, New York
2 )    Los Angeles, California
3 )    Houston, Texas
4 )    Phoenix, Arizona
5 )    Chicago, Illinois   
6 )    San Antonio, Texas
7 )    San Jose, California
8 )    San Diego, California
9 )    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
10 )  Dallas, Texas
Logged
Napoleon
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,892


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2012, 07:45:54 PM »

Metro or city limits?
Logged
traininthedistance
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,547


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: February 21, 2012, 12:19:22 AM »
« Edited: February 21, 2012, 09:16:37 AM by traininthedistance »

What will be the ten largest cities fifty years from now?

Here are my projections:

1 )    New York City, New York
2 )    Los Angeles, California
3 )    Houston, Texas
4 )    Phoenix, Arizona
5 )    Chicago, Illinois    
6 )    San Antonio, Texas
7 )    San Jose, California
8 )    San Diego, California
9 )    Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
10 )  Dallas, Texas

I expect water issues to severely constrain Phoenix's growth sometime within the next couple of decades.  They will eventually hit all of the sunbelt cities, but not quite as hard or fast.

In general, environmental factors will eventually reverse the long-term trend of south and west migration, as people will move north and east where there is abundant rainfall, reasonable temperatures, and (possibly) an urban form friendly to a post-oil world. However, it very well may take 100 years rather than 50 for most of the cities here, and the ability of many south and west cities to annex their hinterlands will keep their numbers up.  So only Phoenix seems that out of place.

I think Columbus is a dark-horse option for the top 10, actually.  Unlike most of the Midwest, it's still growing; it can expand its borders as needed; and if I'm right about water issues forcing an end to Sunbelt migration then it could stand to benefit.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 21,972


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: February 21, 2012, 08:24:26 AM »

Of those cities, I think only San Antonio and Houston have scope for further annexation and expansion, while the others are stuck with their current boundaries.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.215 seconds with 12 queries.