Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 19, 2013, 06:01:35 am
News:
Please delete your old personal messages.
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2012 Elections
2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
(Moderators:
Tender Branson
,
Big DaddyTX
)
MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3 (Read 859 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 27966
Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39
MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
on:
February 14, 2012, 02:12:00 pm »
New Poll:
Michigan President by Rasmussen on 2012-02-13
Summary:
Santorum:
35%
Romney:
32%
Paul:
13%
Gingrich:
11%
Other:
1%
Undecided:
8%
Poll Source URL:
Full Poll Details
Logged
crypto-fascist superhero
wormyguy
YaBB God
Posts: 7815
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: -7.65
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #1 on:
February 14, 2012, 02:13:19 pm »
Hmm, Romney surging after Maine, or PPP poll is an outlier, or this poll is an outlier?
Logged
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV6Bq8xeQrU
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 27966
Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #2 on:
February 14, 2012, 02:14:50 pm »
I think this poll "looks the most correct" out of the last 3.
Logged
crypto-fascist superhero
wormyguy
YaBB God
Posts: 7815
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: -7.65
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #3 on:
February 14, 2012, 02:16:33 pm »
Quote from: Tender Branson on February 14, 2012, 02:14:50 pm
I think this poll "looks the most correct" out of the last 3.
Yeah, PPP seems like an outlier here; as Nate Silver pointed out it has 48% of respondents being evangelicals, which doesn't seem like Michigan.
Logged
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV6Bq8xeQrU
Volrath50
Sr. Member
Posts: 389
Political Matrix
E: 3.23, S: -4.87
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #4 on:
February 14, 2012, 02:18:34 pm »
I liked PPP's poll better.
Logged
When I sharpen my flashing sword and my hand grasps it in judgment, I will take vengeance on my adversaries and repay those who hate me.
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
YaBB God
Posts: 14739
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #5 on:
February 14, 2012, 02:27:02 pm »
Quote from: wormyguy on February 14, 2012, 02:16:33 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on February 14, 2012, 02:14:50 pm
I think this poll "looks the most correct" out of the last 3.
Yeah, PPP seems like an outlier here; as Nate Silver pointed out it has 48% of respondents being evangelicals, which doesn't seem like Michigan.
Seemingly, in 2008, evangelicals comprised 39% of Michigan GOP primary voters
http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/romney-s-evangelical-problem-20110519
Logged
Moderate Liberal Populist
[Personal 45%/Economic 42%] / Defense 'Hawk'
Registered in Georgia for Fantasy Politics
crypto-fascist superhero
wormyguy
YaBB God
Posts: 7815
Political Matrix
E: 7.61, S: -7.65
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #6 on:
February 14, 2012, 02:38:33 pm »
Quote from: Democratic Hawk on February 14, 2012, 02:27:02 pm
Quote from: wormyguy on February 14, 2012, 02:16:33 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on February 14, 2012, 02:14:50 pm
I think this poll "looks the most correct" out of the last 3.
Yeah, PPP seems like an outlier here; as Nate Silver pointed out it has 48% of respondents being evangelicals, which doesn't seem like Michigan.
Seemingly, in 2008, evangelicals comprised 39% of Michigan GOP primary voters
http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/romney-s-evangelical-problem-20110519
But it's not like you'd expect there to be more evangelicals now (especially since there isn't a Democratic primary at the same time).
Logged
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WV6Bq8xeQrU
Mr. Morden
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 14683
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #7 on:
February 14, 2012, 03:02:06 pm »
Quote from: wormyguy on February 14, 2012, 02:38:33 pm
Quote from: Democratic Hawk on February 14, 2012, 02:27:02 pm
Quote from: wormyguy on February 14, 2012, 02:16:33 pm
Quote from: Tender Branson on February 14, 2012, 02:14:50 pm
I think this poll "looks the most correct" out of the last 3.
Yeah, PPP seems like an outlier here; as Nate Silver pointed out it has 48% of respondents being evangelicals, which doesn't seem like Michigan.
Seemingly, in 2008, evangelicals comprised 39% of Michigan GOP primary voters
http://www.nationaljournal.com/magazine/romney-s-evangelical-problem-20110519
But it's not like you'd expect there to be more evangelicals now (especially since there isn't a Democratic primary at the same time).
There wasn't a "real" Democratic primary last time either.
Anyway, PPP was also an outlier with the Santorum surge among the national polls, so this isn't too surprising.
Logged
What is your opinion of this thread?
Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.
Quote from: Lunar on March 20, 2011, 10:58:04 am
Being a moderator is basically like one giant party. Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Likely Voter
YaBB God
Posts: 4015
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #8 on:
February 14, 2012, 03:06:27 pm »
It makes more sense that Santorum has a small lead than a huge lead. Romney has ties to MI, won in 2008 and has been running ads already.
It will be interesting to see how Romney runs his campaign in MI. Will he (and his SuperPAC) go all scorched earth to stop Santorum?
Logged
Senator North Carolina Yankee
North Carolina Yankee
YaBB God
Posts: 20960
Political Matrix
E: 4.45, S: 3.22
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #9 on:
February 14, 2012, 03:16:08 pm »
Quote from: Severe Voter on February 14, 2012, 03:06:27 pm
It makes more sense that Santorum has a small lead than a huge lead. Romney has ties to MI, won in 2008 and has been running ads already.
It will be interesting to see how Romney runs his campaign in MI. Will he (and his SuperPAC) go all scorched earth to stop Santorum?
If he is smart, he will make a direct connection between his business experience and differential decision making versus Obama and how it would have lead to more jobs.
Also, he should get ahead of the "Let Detroit Go Bankrupt" attack and turn it into a postive, rather than a negative.
He is giving an "economic speech" on the 24th in Michigan. It is said he will either release a new economic plan or reintroduce his previous one in more concise fashion.
He needs to stop assuming people will automatically link his soundbites to job creation, and instead state how it will create jobs.
The last thing he should do is make a firm link between the debt and long term job creation, because Obama will try to decouple and set them up against one another.
Logged
He's BACK!!! His Time Has Come Once Again!
Now We're All Gonna Die! No One is Safe From His Wrath!
All life is a blur of Republicans and meat.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
Posts: 36293
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #10 on:
February 14, 2012, 04:12:08 pm »
Romney is going to win in a landslide. Dammit.
Logged
NHI
YaBB God
Posts: 2216
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #11 on:
February 14, 2012, 08:57:18 pm »
It probably won't be a landslide, but I predict Romney will win Michigan, and end this sudden interest in Santorum.
Logged
"Our president thinks this country's in decline. It is if he's president. It's not if I'm president." -- Mitt Romney
OC
olawakandi
YaBB God
Posts: 8397
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #12 on:
February 14, 2012, 09:16:35 pm »
Yea, that PPP showing Santorum winning by 15 is a real gift to the Dems. But it will be close with a Romney win.
Logged
Simfan34
YaBB God
Posts: 7499
Political Matrix
E: 1.26, S: 2.61
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #13 on:
February 16, 2012, 03:44:38 pm »
It seems that both PPP polls you dismissed are correct.
Logged
Quote from: Lief on February 14, 2013, 08:49:41 pm
I haven't read the article, but I firmly support Simfan's efforts to blame Lena Dunham for our society's rot.
Quote from: Bacon King on February 14, 2013, 08:49:41 pm
Simfan, your standards are impossible to meet. You can't have a girl who is also a large fireplace.
Quote from: Inks.LWC. on February 14, 2013, 08:49:41 pm
[Simfan] is a quality poster
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 27966
Political Matrix
E: -7.23, S: -5.39
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #14 on:
February 21, 2012, 01:11:13 pm »
A new one is out in 1 hour.
Logged
JulioMadrid
YaBB God
Posts: 5685
Political Matrix
E: -8.13, S: -7.13
Re: MI PrimR: Rasmussen: Santorum by 3
«
Reply #15 on:
February 21, 2012, 01:54:38 pm »
I predict Romney's leading by 1 or 2
Logged
My evolution:
E: -6.06 -> -6.97 -> -6.97 -> -8.13
S: -6.78 -> -6.09 -> -7.30 -> -7.13
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...