Inks' approvals as a moderator of Forum Community

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

That was completely irrelevant to the topic at hand.

No, Inks is being targeted for removal by some Democrats simply because he is a Republican. It is that simple. They will not admit it, of course.

 My post is reflecting upon how mad some quarters of this place have become. We cannot even have Republican moderators who care and do a good job without being hassled by partisans. Madness.

I'm pretty sure Phil has a beef with him, too.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Phil is stuck in 2004. He is one of the best characters on here, but he is not representative of what is happening here.

And some Democratic supporters on here do not cover up what is really up. Democrats are using this to try and get rid of one of the last GOP moderators. This place needs more GOP Mods, not less. Torie would be a good nominee.

Yeah, because clearly we should be giving mod powers to people based on party- not qualifications.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Phil is stuck in 2004. He is one of the best characters on here, but he is not representative of what is happening here.

And some Democratic supporters on here do not cover up what is really up. Democrats are using this to try and get rid of one of the last GOP moderators. This place needs more GOP Mods, not less. Torie would be a good nominee.

Yeah, because clearly we should be giving mod powers to people based on party- not qualifications.

An unpartisan site about US elections should have a committee in charge that is reflective of the American electorate, not the electorate of Los Angeles County. The site is swinging too far left, and the site is not getting better with this swing...

That's ridiculous.  I don't care if we have a panel of only Republican moderators or a panel of only Democratic moderators, as long as they were all chosen based on their qualifications and have proven that they can do the job fairly and without bias.

If you don't like this site because it is too liberal for you, then the logout button is just at the bottom of the page.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Phil is stuck in 2004. He is one of the best characters on here, but he is not representative of what is happening here.

And some Democratic supporters on here do not cover up what is really up. Democrats are using this to try and get rid of one of the last GOP moderators. This place needs more GOP Mods, not less. Torie would be a good nominee.

Yeah, because clearly we should be giving mod powers to people based on party- not qualifications.

An unpartisan site about US elections should have a committee in charge that is reflective of the American electorate, not the electorate of Los Angeles County. The site is swinging too far left, and the site is not getting better with this swing...

That's ridiculous.  I don't care if we have a panel of only Republican moderators or a panel of only Democratic moderators, as long as they were all chosen based on their qualifications and have proven that they can do the job fairly and without bias.

If you don't like this site because it is too liberal for you, then the logout button is just at the bottom of the page.

I like this site, but it used to be far better and far more bipartisan. I do not even see real arguments for why Inks should be removed. The guy cares and, I can assure you, is unbiased as evidenced by his equally painful treatment of me and Phil. All I can see is hating on him because he's a real Republican, really...

It's been said twice now that two three of his biggest supporters are DEMOCRATS.  Phil, who has a huge problem with Inks, is a REPUBLICAN.

Stop making crap up.  There is no 'conspiracy' here.  Come on, don't turn this thread into another huge embarrassment for yourself like in all the others.

[The world will shine with light in our nightmare]

Current Standing:

35.71% approve
55.71% disapprove
8.57% neutral