MA-MassInsight: Sen. Brown (R) leads Warren (D) by 10
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 15, 2024, 11:07:17 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  2012 Senatorial Election Polls
  MA-MassInsight: Sen. Brown (R) leads Warren (D) by 10
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: MA-MassInsight: Sen. Brown (R) leads Warren (D) by 10  (Read 738 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,177
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -6.06, S: -4.84

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 01, 2012, 06:25:20 AM »

52-42 Brown

http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2012/02/new-poll-shows-2.php
Logged
Vosem
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,637
United States


Political Matrix
E: 8.13, S: -6.09

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 01, 2012, 06:46:10 AM »

Anyone spot a pattern? Human minds are supposed to be really good at spotting patterns.
Logged
JohnnyLongtorso
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,798


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 01, 2012, 07:41:11 AM »

Why are they just releasing a month-old poll?
Logged
Vermin Supreme
Henry Clay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 464


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 01, 2012, 01:12:45 PM »

How is Scott Brown refusing to support women rights such as contraception not hurting in Massachusetts?
Logged
Small Business Owner of Any Repute
Mr. Moderate
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,431
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 01, 2012, 01:20:50 PM »

How is Scott Brown refusing to support women rights such as contraception not hurting in Massachusetts?

Massachusetts is nowhere near as pro-choice as you probably think it is.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,351


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 01, 2012, 01:23:38 PM »
« Edited: March 01, 2012, 01:35:03 PM by Nathan »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

This is a push poll. The cross-tabs are also crap. There's no way and no reason for Brown to be getting twenty per cent of registered Democrats. They asked all sorts of bizarre (for a poll) strategic questions (such as whether or not it was important to vote against Brown to keep Republicans from controlling the chamber, which got numbers almost as high as Brown's in the main line and seven points above Warren's) and the result is an aggregate of completely nonsensical statistical ricochets.

I can believe that Brown is ahead for the moment because there is something of a lull in interest in this in the state right now, but he is not ahead by ten points and he is not over fifty per cent. The 49-44 Brown Rasmussen poll that was just released is a lot more reasonable the way things currently stand.

Incidentally, the comments on the link are...troubling. All sorts of really unnerving barely-coded misogyny, among other things. Put it this way, one of the least hackish commenters is pbrower.
Logged
Vermin Supreme
Henry Clay
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 464


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 01, 2012, 01:45:37 PM »

How is Scott Brown refusing to support women rights such as contraception not hurting in Massachusetts?

Massachusetts is nowhere near as pro-choice as you probably think it is.

Then how come they never elect pro life politicans to high office positions such as governor and congressional races?

Logged
Landslide Lyndon
px75
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 26,775
Greece


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 01, 2012, 01:46:23 PM »

How is Scott Brown refusing to support women rights such as contraception not hurting in Massachusetts?

Massachusetts is nowhere near as pro-choice as you probably think it is.

What has that to do with contraception?
Logged
Svensson
NVTownsend
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 630


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 01, 2012, 03:16:58 PM »

...interesting. I'll be frank, I'm having a hard time putting much stock into this, given the trend of previous polls. Not that I'm complaining, mind, since he's probably the best Massachusetts will ever get.

(Not that it's saying much.)
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,351


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 01, 2012, 07:22:19 PM »

...interesting. I'll be frank, I'm having a hard time putting much stock into this, given the trend of previous polls. Not that I'm complaining, mind, since he's probably the best Massachusetts will ever get.

(Not that it's saying much.)

The best Senator Massachusetts has had in modern times was...well, Ted Kennedy, obviously (who doesn't deserve deification by a long shot, but who does deserve the praise he gets for the repeal of immigration quotas and the Americans with Disabilities Act among other things), but Kerry, Brooke, and Saltonstall were also all considerably better than Scott Brown. Not Tsongas, though. Tsongas was kind of a sad sack.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,251
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 01, 2012, 08:13:02 PM »

How is Scott Brown refusing to support women rights such as contraception not hurting in Massachusetts?

Massachusetts is nowhere near as pro-choice as you probably think it is.

Then how come they never elect pro life politicans to high office positions such as governor and congressional races?



They got Stephen Lynch.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,351


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 01, 2012, 08:16:01 PM »

How is Scott Brown refusing to support women rights such as contraception not hurting in Massachusetts?

Massachusetts is nowhere near as pro-choice as you probably think it is.

Then how come they never elect pro life politicans to high office positions such as governor and congressional races?



They got Stephen Lynch.

Also possibly Richard Neal, depending on just how supportive of abortion restrictions one has to be to be 'pro-life'.
Logged
Ogre Mage
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,500
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.39, S: -5.22

P
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 04, 2012, 09:47:44 AM »

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

lol


Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.037 seconds with 13 queries.