Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 23, 2014, 02:41:08 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Individual Politics (Moderators: Grad Students are the Worst, Lunar, Torie)
| | |-+  Who do you favor in the Israel-Palestine conflict?
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print
Poll
Question: ....
Israelis   -11 (17.2%)
Palestinians   -26 (40.6%)
Neutral   -25 (39.1%)
Undecided   -2 (3.1%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 63

Author Topic: Who do you favor in the Israel-Palestine conflict?  (Read 2727 times)
ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13260
United States


View Profile
« Reply #75 on: March 14, 2012, 06:03:50 pm »
Ignore

Idea of Palestinians deserving their state is stupid as Jersey Shore. Also, both needs to be stopped RIGHT NOW.
I agree on Jersey Shore at least....why is Israel always right in your views?
Logged

America's like that hot chick everyone wants, and illegal immigrants are all the nerds that she should say "no" to.
President William McKinley
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4486
United States


View Profile
« Reply #76 on: March 14, 2012, 10:20:35 pm »
Ignore

I have read all of the posts here and have enjoyed this discussion- I chose Israel wich I never would have done 40 years ago. Some one mentioned the USS Liberty- that incident happened when I was in the Navy and shook many of us... our ships are very clearly identified as being ours and there is almost no chance that was done by mistakte- I resented the Isrealis for many years afterwards

Over the years I have changed... some of it due to involvement in my church and some of it following the conflict over the years- and some considerin what the Jews have gone thru...they have undergone persecution unlike any other ethnic group in the world and having a strong Jewish state can protect them from harm
Politically- I find the notion of porpotional response to be not realistic... it is a repeated example but if Quebec lobbed rockets into Vermont we would not respond proportionally...the rocket attacks are constant from Gaza even though the West Bank is a completely different story

But moreso I come as a Christian...I know this will put me in disagreement with many of you. I ask myself who will let me visit and worship in Jerusalem and who will let the Jews...the highways in Saudi Arabia divide exits for Muslims and Infidels and only Muslims can enter Mecca...will Jerusalem become the same? Christians and Muslims have full democratic and religious rights in Isreal right now- I do not believe it would be the same if the Palestinian s were in control.

This issue is much like Afghanistan- we are involved in something which has a history ten times as long as our nation's history. I support Israel bcause I believe it is by far more democratic and accepting of other faiths.

Let the salvo commence...
Logged

Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38384
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #77 on: March 15, 2012, 12:02:11 am »
Ignore

No, of course Jerusalem wouldn't be the same because it's not a holy city. Don't be ridiculous.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11289


View Profile
« Reply #78 on: March 15, 2012, 12:05:03 am »
Ignore

Clarence, entirely setting aside for a moment any views that you might have on the UN as an institution, how would you feel about making Jerusalem in some way international or a 'treaty city', as was called for by the original 1947 plan?
Logged

A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights.

His idea of freedom is - it is a bad thing and should be stopped at all costs.

Nathan-land.  As much fun as watching paint dry... literally.
President William McKinley
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4486
United States


View Profile
« Reply #79 on: March 15, 2012, 12:21:54 am »
Ignore

I do not have a problem with that at all- though if we were to consider the UN and how this would be acheived it might not be as practical... another idea could be to split Jerusalem excluding the Old City and make only the Old City an international zone with the rest being able to serve as the capital of Israel and- if they wanted- Palestine...this could include the area fought over for settlements
Logged

asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11289


View Profile
« Reply #80 on: March 15, 2012, 12:59:37 pm »
Ignore

Land swaps in outer Jerusalem with the Old City and immediate environs (perhaps Bethlehem as well) being internationalized seems like it could work. Israel certainly doesn't seem likely to give up the Knesset site, for instance, and besides, where else could a permanent capital of Palestine possibly go?
Logged

A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights.

His idea of freedom is - it is a bad thing and should be stopped at all costs.

Nathan-land.  As much fun as watching paint dry... literally.
Mideast Assemblyman Ben
benconstine
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30396
United States


View Profile
« Reply #81 on: March 18, 2012, 09:15:05 pm »
Ignore

Israel, of course.  That includes, however, the establishment of a Palestinian State.  I fully reject the notion that one must oppose Palestine to support Israel.
Logged

Obama High's debate team:

"Now let me be clear...I...I...um...uh...now let me be clear.  I strongly condemn the affirmative in the strongest possible terms, and I am closely monitoring their arguments.  Let me be clear on this."
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20903
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #82 on: March 18, 2012, 09:32:47 pm »
Ignore

Indeed.
Logged

Quote from:   Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
Carlos Danger
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8410
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #83 on: March 18, 2012, 09:43:40 pm »
Ignore

I support an independent Zululand.  I reject the notion that to be pro-white one must be anti-black.

Considered using Romans and Jews to avoid the cliche, but figured the cliche is the the most accurate comparison, even though there are crucial difference such as that the Afrikaners were there first and also weren't quite so fond of bombing civilians and funding terrorism.
Logged

Хahar
Xahar
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38384
Bangladesh


View Profile
« Reply #84 on: March 18, 2012, 09:49:07 pm »
Ignore

I support an independent Zululand.  I reject the notion that to be pro-white one must be anti-black.

Considered using Romans and Jews to avoid the cliche, but figured the cliche is the the most accurate comparison, even though there are crucial difference such as that the Afrikaners were there first and also weren't quite so fond of bombing civilians and funding terrorism.

Claims that the Afrikaners were there first are kind of sketchy at best, since they were played up quite a bit by whites in order to assert their indigenous claim to the land.
Logged

Update reading list

The idea of parodying the preceding Atlasian's postings is laughable, of course, but not for reasons one might expect.
I am stabbed by grace and slinging blood
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 70965
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #85 on: March 18, 2012, 10:06:15 pm »
Ignore

I suppose it depends on what you mean by "there". South Africa is a big place.
Logged

Famous True Leftists:

Carlos Danger
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8410
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #86 on: March 18, 2012, 10:08:24 pm »
Ignore

Well, whatever the case, the Dutch were there first, certainly in the cities.  Of course, the Khoi-San/Bushmen were there first, first.
Logged

Assemblyman JCL
JohanusCalvinusLibertas
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3823
United States


View Profile
« Reply #87 on: March 22, 2012, 11:10:17 am »
Ignore

Unequivocably Israel. Could the Israeli government expand civil liberties towards the Palestinian communities? Absolutely. But the understanding needs to be that Jerusalem (including the Temple Mount) belongs to the Jew. Add to that id still end foreign aid.
Logged

Congressional Races
Jackie Walorski (R/IN-2)
Marlin Stutzman (R/IN-3)
Todd Rokita (R/IN-4)
Chard Reid (Lib/IN-5)
Luke Messer (R/IN-6)
Carlos May (R/IN-7)
Larry Bucshon (R/IN-8)
Todd Young (R/IN-9)
Tom Massie (R/KY-4)
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11289


View Profile
« Reply #88 on: March 22, 2012, 04:09:30 pm »
Ignore

The Bantu were in the northern and eastern (currently most heavily populated) parts of South Africa first, whereas the Dutch do seem to have been in the Cape Province before them. South Africa is unique in that relatively few people currently there are really 'indigenous', they all just sort of collided.

Of course that doesn't justify the history of apartheid, especially considering there were people in the Cape Province before the Dutch, they just weren't Bantu.
Logged

A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights.

His idea of freedom is - it is a bad thing and should be stopped at all costs.

Nathan-land.  As much fun as watching paint dry... literally.
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines