Shouldn't limited govt work and mostly private sector work be a disadvantage? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 09:46:29 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Shouldn't limited govt work and mostly private sector work be a disadvantage? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: Shouldn't limited govt work and mostly private sector work be a disadvantage?  (Read 3244 times)
anvi
anvikshiki
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,400
Netherlands


« on: March 04, 2012, 04:51:37 PM »

A good businessperson is not necessarily a good economist--they may be but they are not necessarily so.  Businesspeople, even those in investment, don't necessarily pay much attention to the growth of the economy as a whole.  They also tend to cut labor costs to a minimum of what is needed so as to yield good productivity and maximized profits.  Furthermore, though massive debts are certainly bad for government and the economy as a whole, the government is not supposed to be a for-profit business.  The rhetoric of businesspeople being better than others as presidents derives from the wish on the part of those in favor of this that government be run to the advantage of business, not that government be run like a business.  There are certainly some advantages to this, but, if that is the exclusive interest of a president, many things will get missed that shouldn't be.    
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.018 seconds with 13 queries.