Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 03, 2015, 03:41:14 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  Congressional Elections (Moderator: Brittain33)
| | |-+  Rep. Altmire (D-PA) may be thrown off ballot because of where a staffer lives.
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Rep. Altmire (D-PA) may be thrown off ballot because of where a staffer lives.  (Read 699 times)
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52879


View Profile
« on: March 04, 2012, 07:33:27 pm »
Ignore

Actually, he might be thrown off the ballot because the signatures the staffer collected might not be valid (because she might not be allowed to circulate for Altmire due to residency requirements) but the title I chose grabs your attention.  Wink


http://www.timesonline.com/news/local_news/challenge-to-altmire-s-petition-hinges-on-staffer-s-home/article_a8330c1a-eb0c-587a-a139-8a4f3b234309.html

Congressman Critz has challenged 942 of Altmire's 1,651 signatures. Altmire's camp withdrew over 300 suspect signatures. The aide in question submitted 385 signatures. If a judge rules that she does not actually reside in the district and, therefore, cannot circulate for her boss, the signatures she obtained would be thrown out and Altmire would be off the ballot pending an appeal.

A ruling is expected tomorrow - Monday, March 5th. Oh, the drama... Smiley
Logged



The entire country is pretty much Republican.
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34136


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 04, 2012, 07:50:36 pm »
Ignore

So who is Santorum going to be voting for on Tuesday?
Logged

JohnnyLongtorso
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6848


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 04, 2012, 09:23:15 pm »
Ignore

Even if the judge rules against Altmire, he can appeal to federal court, because residency requirements for petition circulators are unconstitutional. They've been struck down in a bunch of states.
Logged
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17517


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 04, 2012, 10:34:44 pm »
Ignore

This is probably the stupidest thing I've heard all year.
Logged

A New Chapter

"I feel like Paulette Revere the recession is coming, the recession is coming! - Hillary Clinton, April 3, 2008
Snowstalker's Last Stand
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19410
Greece


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 04, 2012, 10:41:54 pm »
Ignore

So who is Santorum going to be voting for on Tuesday?

Neither. He lives in Virginia.
Logged

○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34136


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 04, 2012, 11:06:30 pm »
Ignore

So who is Santorum going to be voting for on Tuesday?

Neither. He lives in Virginia.

I know that. My point is that Santorum won't be able to vote for himself, because he's not on the ballot there.
Logged

Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52879


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 05, 2012, 12:39:29 am »
Ignore

So who is Santorum going to be voting for on Tuesday?

No idea what the joke is here. Enlighten me.
Logged



The entire country is pretty much Republican.
The Year Summer Ended In July
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 74580
France


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 05, 2012, 02:32:08 am »
Ignore

This is probably the stupidest thing I've heard all year.

Yeah the law is utterly inane if as written. So this doesn't surprise me:

Even if the judge rules against Altmire, he can appeal to federal court, because residency requirements for petition circulators are unconstitutional. They've been struck down in a bunch of states.
Logged

Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52879


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 05, 2012, 08:40:15 am »
Ignore

So who is Santorum going to be voting for on Tuesday?

Neither. He lives in Virginia.

I know that. My point is that Santorum won't be able to vote for himself, because he's not on the ballot there.

Weak reach at a residency joke.
Logged



The entire country is pretty much Republican.
minionofmidas - supplemental forum account
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58767
India


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 05, 2012, 02:08:48 pm »
Ignore

Lolpennsylvanians.
Logged

If I'm shown as having been active here recently it's either because I've been using the gallery, because I've been using the search engine looking up something from way back, or because I've been reading the most excellent UK by-elections thread again.
muon2
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9812


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 05, 2012, 02:43:52 pm »
Ignore

Even if the judge rules against Altmire, he can appeal to federal court, because residency requirements for petition circulators are unconstitutional. They've been struck down in a bunch of states.

Yes, but signatories to a petition must live in the district, so it may not be unconstitutional for the circulator of that petition to also be a resident. I'm curious if there's a federal case on this question.
Logged

I'm on my road trip to the Pac NW. Red is an overnight stay; blue is a point of interest; cyan is a stop; green is just a drive through.

Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52879


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 05, 2012, 05:25:43 pm »
Ignore

Judge rules in Altmire's favor.
Logged



The entire country is pretty much Republican.
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35119
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: March 06, 2012, 07:24:26 am »
Ignore

The law for residency requirements are dumb, but it's even dumber that the campaign didn't catch this before.
Logged
jimrtex
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6291
Macedonia, The Former Yugoslav Republic of


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 08, 2012, 12:20:58 am »
Ignore

Even if the judge rules against Altmire, he can appeal to federal court, because residency requirements for petition circulators are unconstitutional. They've been struck down in a bunch of states.

Yes, but signatories to a petition must live in the district, so it may not be unconstitutional for the circulator of that petition to also be a resident. I'm curious if there's a federal case on this question.


http://www.opednews.com/articles/genera_michael__070105_pennsylvania_has_mor.htm

Morrill v Weaver is almost exactly on target, other than it applied to a minor party.  In Pennsylvania, minor parties do not qualify directly, but rather their nominated candidates  petition to get on the general election ballot in a way parallel to independent candidates.  The party qualifies based on the success of the party candidates (it might just be governor).

In the case of Morrill v Weaver, the Green Party was trying to get on the ballot, and the gubernatorial was gathering signatures for his run, but couldn't witness signatures for district candidates unless they happened to be in his county.

In collecting signatures to get on a primary ballot it is somewhat different in that potential candidates are competitors.  It makes sense to require signatures to be collected by someone who is affiliated with the party.  Otherwise, an opposition party could run a primary candidate.  Whether someone who resides in another district could be considered an outsider, is another question.

In Pennsylvania, they determined that the person who collected the signatures lived with her parents (in the district) even though she had rented an apartment.
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines