Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2013, 08:04:57 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections (Moderators: Mr. Morden, Bacon King, Big DaddyTX)
| | |-+  March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 Print
Author Topic: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**  (Read 6124 times)
Mr. Morden
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14758
United States


View Profile
« Reply #250 on: March 10, 2012, 09:26:06 pm »

Newt dropping out actually nets Mittens a few delegates per Nate Silver. Well, about 10 delegates net if Newt hadn't been in the race to start with, and not much if Newt drops out now. It is obvious when you think about it. If Mittens with everyone around is on track with the supers to get an absolute majority of the delegates, it doesn't matter who has the other 45% to 49% of them or whatever. In short, this whole if only one "conservative" were in the race meme against the suspiciously moderate Mittens (I have to laugh every time I hear that one - I'm a moderate - Mitttens isn't - period), has been and remains way over hyped. There is no there, there. It only matters in absolute winner take all states, like Florida, where Mittens on his own one on one would have won anyway, since he got 46% on his own, and gets about a quarter of the Newt votes to boot.

Not really.  It also matters in any state that's WTA by congressional district.  Especially going forward, now that there are going to be more states with WTA by CD + WTA at large beyond April 1.  With Gingrich in the race, Romney can win quite a few CDs with just ~35 to 40% of the vote.  But if Gingrich is out, then that's no longer the case.  In the other post by Nate Silver, he talks about how Santorum can only beat Romney if he starts doing so well that he wins the majority of delegates in states like California.  Obviously, he's more likely to win more delegates in CA (and Romney's likely to win fewer delegates in CA) if Gingrich isn't in the race, pulling more votes from Santorum, given how the CA delegate allocation works.

This is why whether Gingrich decides to drop out or not this week is the key question going forward in terms of how quickly this process gets wrapped up, and whether Romney is able to have a "clean victory" in primary season or not.
Logged

What is your opinion of this thread?

Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.

Being a moderator is basically like one giant party.  Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24386
United States


View Profile
« Reply #251 on: March 10, 2012, 09:31:53 pm »
Ignore

Yes, except that about half of the CA CD's have next to no Pubs in them, and the Pubs that are there, are not Santorum types. If Newt is gone, it might flip 2 or 3 CD's in the Central Valley, and maybe a couple in the inland empire. That is about it. CA is one state where the salience of economic issues for Pubs is very high - and for good reason. Also the primary is closed, so we won't have any mischief voters, like happened in Ohio and particularly Michigan.

Newt by the way says he is going to Tampa even if he loses both Alabama and Mississippi. I think he means it. He is not in this race at this point to win the nomination. He's in it for the klieg lights.
« Last Edit: March 10, 2012, 09:36:16 pm by Torie »Logged
ajb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 872
United States


View Profile
« Reply #252 on: March 10, 2012, 09:32:43 pm »
Ignore

A pretty much perfect result in Kansas. A disastrous result (though expected) for Romney's near candidate best friend. Hoping it affects MS and AL.
Bad? Certainly. Disastrous? That's pushing it. It's overshadowed by our ninja delegates.

You're a Newt supporter? Because he's to whom I was referring.
Really? I haven't heard Newt being called his best friend before. And I wouldn't call his showing disastrous either. He had no expectations and is focusing on the south.

He's his new best friend because he keeps the Anti Romney vote split.

Newt dropping out actually nets Mittens a few delegates per Nate Silver. Well, about 10 delegates net if Newt hadn't been in the race to start with, and not much if Newt drops out now. It is obvious when you think about it. If Mittens with everyone around is on track with the supers to get an absolute majority of the delegates, it doesn't matter who has the other 45% to 49% of them or whatever. In short, this whole if only one "conservative" were in the race meme against the suspiciously moderate Mittens (I have to laugh every time I hear that one - I'm a moderate - Mitttens isn't - period), has been and remains way over hyped. There is no there, there.

According to that same Nate Silver piece, Santorum would have gained 110 delegates relative to what he's currently got if Gingrich were not in the race, thus reducing the gap between him and Romney by about a hundred delegates. He would also, by Silver's argument, have won SC, GA, OH and AK.

No, those delegates just move from the Newt column to the Rick column, which is irrelevant to the Romney systems engineering delegate blueprint. Just add the Newt and Rick totals together and consider them one candidate. The only wild card delegates really are the Paul delegates in a brokered convention. Rick would just put Newt on his ticket if need be to get the Newt delegates. What a team!  Tongue

If this is indeed the Romney blueprint, it's a faulty design. There's a non-trivial chance that Santorum in a Gingrich-free race might a) increase the odds of Romney not getting a majority of delegates, and b) actually start winning more votes, and delegates, than Romney himself. This would be a problem, assuming that the goal of the Romney blueprint is to elect a president, and not merely a presidential candidate.
Logged
LINCOLN REPUBLICAN
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9839


View Profile
« Reply #253 on: March 10, 2012, 09:55:28 pm »
Ignore

Thank you Guam, from Mitt and myself.

Cheesy 
Logged





Mr. Morden
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14758
United States


View Profile
« Reply #254 on: March 10, 2012, 10:07:09 pm »

Thank you Guam, from Mitt and myself.

Cheesy 

I'm sure the entire island of Guam feels blessed to have Winfield's thanks.
Logged

What is your opinion of this thread?

Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.

Being a moderator is basically like one giant party.  Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
rbt48
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 726


View Profile WWW
« Reply #255 on: March 10, 2012, 10:10:39 pm »
Ignore

Which of the remaining primaries are open ones where Santorum could appeal to Democrats to vote for him?
Logged

So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68061
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #256 on: March 10, 2012, 10:42:11 pm »
Ignore

Dammit Romney broke 20%. He gets delegates. Sad
Logged

LINCOLN REPUBLICAN
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9839


View Profile
« Reply #257 on: March 10, 2012, 10:46:52 pm »
Ignore

Which of the remaining primaries are open ones where Santorum could appeal to Democrats to vote for him?

Grasping at straws now are we?

Logged





LINCOLN REPUBLICAN
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9839


View Profile
« Reply #258 on: March 10, 2012, 10:48:33 pm »
Ignore

Dammit Romney broke 20%. He gets delegates. Sad

Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy
Logged





ajb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 872
United States


View Profile
« Reply #259 on: March 10, 2012, 10:52:52 pm »
Ignore

Dammit Romney broke 20%. He gets delegates. Sad

Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy
And in the process helped Santorum to collect even more delegates than he would have if Romney had scored 19.9 instead of 20.9.
Logged
LINCOLN REPUBLICAN
Winfield
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9839


View Profile
« Reply #260 on: March 10, 2012, 10:55:29 pm »
Ignore

Which of the remaining primaries are open ones where Santorum could appeal to Democrats to vote for him?

Open Contests

Alabama (50)
Arizona (Semi-closed, with primaries open only to unaffiliated or unrepresented voters, except for the Libertarian primary.)(57)
Arkansas (36)
Georgia (75)
Hawaii (Open primary for state, local, and congressional races; caucus system for presidential races.)(20)
Idaho (32)
Indiana (46)
Massachusetts (All races' primaries open for "unenrolled"/unaffiliated voters only)(41)
Michigan (59)
Mississippi (37)
Missouri (53)
South Carolina (50)
Tennessee (58)
Texas (152)
Vermont (17)
Virginia (49)
Wisconsin (42)

Logged





So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68061
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #261 on: March 10, 2012, 11:23:56 pm »
Ignore

Dammit Romney broke 20%. He gets delegates. Sad

Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy
And in the process helped Santorum to collect even more delegates than he would have if Romney had scored 19.9 instead of 20.9.

Howso? If Romney had failed to break 20% everyone but Santorum would fail viability and Santorum would take all delegates.
Logged

Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14259
United States Minor Outlying Islands


View Profile
« Reply #262 on: March 10, 2012, 11:37:37 pm »

Dammit Romney broke 20%. He gets delegates. Sad

Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy  Cheesy
And in the process helped Santorum to collect even more delegates than he would have if Romney had scored 19.9 instead of 20.9.

Howso? If Romney had failed to break 20% everyone but Santorum would fail viability and Santorum would take all delegates.

If only one candidate got above 20% in Kansas, then delegates would have been awarded proportionally with no cutoff, so all four candidates would have split them.
Logged

So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68061
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #263 on: March 10, 2012, 11:45:45 pm »
Ignore

Well that'd still mean less for Romney and some for Paul.
Logged

Jbrase
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4980
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -6.09

View Profile
« Reply #264 on: March 10, 2012, 11:58:12 pm »
Ignore

Did all those blank counties on the google map just have 0 turnout?
Logged

ajb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 872
United States


View Profile
« Reply #265 on: March 11, 2012, 12:04:50 am »
Ignore

Well that'd still mean less for Romney and some for Paul.
Fewer delegates for both Romney and Santorum (basically, they would have had 2/10 and 5/10 of the at-large delegates, instead of 2/7 and 5/7). Since Santorum would have lost more delegates, the gap between the two of them would have narrowed.
Logged
Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14259
United States Minor Outlying Islands


View Profile
« Reply #266 on: March 11, 2012, 12:28:45 am »

Did all those blank counties on the google map just have 0 turnout?

No; for whatever reason those counties didn't have a caucus. Republicans in those counties could apparently instead caucus at any other county in their congressional district, if they still wanted to participate.
Logged

Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4439
United States


Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74

View Profile WWW
« Reply #267 on: March 11, 2012, 04:53:42 pm »
Ignore

.... but looks like Romney won the most delegates.

384 total cast

112 to Paul (29%)  Won one delegate

101 to Romney (26%) Won three delegates plus three RNC  member pledge.  (Pick up a uncommitted delegate after the balloting for a total of seven.)

23 to Santorm (6%) No delegates

18 to Gingrich (5%) No delegates

130 Uncommitted (34%) Two delegates but one changed to Romney after the vote totals were announced

http://vigop.com/
Logged

A Republican - at least for a little while
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7725
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #268 on: March 11, 2012, 04:56:26 pm »
Ignore

So, Uncommitted won the Virgin Islands popular vote. Tongue
Logged

The Professor
Jr. Member
**
Posts: 93


View Profile
« Reply #269 on: March 11, 2012, 05:01:26 pm »
Ignore

Not surprising Ron Paul won the Virgin Islands considering his supporters are most likely to be virgins.
Logged
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7725
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #270 on: March 11, 2012, 05:19:57 pm »
Ignore

Not surprising Ron Paul won the Virgin Islands considering his supporters are most likely to be virgins.

Are there many in your class, Prof?
Logged

ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8363
United States


Political Matrix
E: 5.42, S: -1.39

P

View Profile
« Reply #271 on: March 11, 2012, 05:22:23 pm »
Ignore

Not surprising Ron Paul won the Virgin Islands considering his supporters are most likely to be virgins.

Are there many in your class, Prof?
No, no virgins in his class, because he does not have a class :p
Logged

Thank You, Margaret Thatcher. You shall be missed.
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8964


View Profile
« Reply #272 on: March 11, 2012, 05:23:53 pm »
Ignore

Not surprising Ron Paul won the Virgin Islands considering his supporters are most likely to be virgins.

Are there many in your class, Prof?
No, no virgins in his class, because he does not have a class :p

We actually established a while before you showed up that he may very well be an actual professor involved with some particularly surreal strand of postmodernism.
Logged

Professor Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 68061
Sweden


View Profile
« Reply #273 on: March 11, 2012, 05:24:46 pm »
Ignore

I wonder what he teaches. Sociology?
Logged

bgwah
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13403
United States


Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17

View Profile
« Reply #274 on: March 11, 2012, 05:26:04 pm »
Ignore

It's probably just someone like Aizen screwing around.
Logged

Pages: 1 ... 6 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory