Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 24, 2013, 08:04:57 pm
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Election Archive
2012 Elections
(Moderators:
Mr. Morden
,
Bacon King
,
Big DaddyTX
)
March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
[
11
]
12
Author
Topic: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread** (Read 6124 times)
Mr. Morden
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 14758
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #250 on:
March 10, 2012, 09:26:06 pm »
Quote from: Torie on March 10, 2012, 08:42:13 pm
Newt dropping out actually nets Mittens a few delegates
per Nate Silver
. Well, about 10 delegates net if Newt hadn't been in the race to start with, and not much if Newt drops out now. It is obvious when you think about it. If Mittens with everyone around is on track with the supers to get an absolute majority of the delegates, it doesn't matter who has the other 45% to 49% of them or whatever. In short, this whole if only one "conservative" were in the race meme against the suspiciously moderate Mittens (I have to laugh every time I hear that one - I'm a moderate - Mitttens isn't - period), has been and remains way over hyped. There is no there, there. It only matters in absolute winner take all states, like Florida, where Mittens on his own one on one would have won anyway, since he got 46% on his own, and gets about a quarter of the Newt votes to boot.
Not really. It also matters in any state that's WTA by congressional district. Especially going forward, now that there are going to be more states with WTA by CD + WTA at large beyond April 1. With Gingrich in the race, Romney can win quite a few CDs with just ~35 to 40% of the vote. But if Gingrich is out, then that's no longer the case. In the other post by Nate Silver, he talks about how Santorum can only beat Romney if he starts doing so well that he wins the majority of delegates in states like California. Obviously, he's more likely to win more delegates in CA (and Romney's likely to win fewer delegates in CA) if Gingrich isn't in the race, pulling more votes from Santorum, given how the CA delegate allocation works.
This is why whether Gingrich decides to drop out or not this week is the key question going forward in terms of how quickly this process gets wrapped up, and whether Romney is able to have a "clean victory" in primary season or not.
Logged
What is your opinion of this thread?
Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.
Quote from: Lunar on March 20, 2011, 10:58:04 am
Being a moderator is basically like one giant party. Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 24386
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #251 on:
March 10, 2012, 09:31:53 pm »
Yes, except that about half of the CA CD's have next to no Pubs in them, and the Pubs that are there, are not Santorum types. If Newt is gone, it might flip 2 or 3 CD's in the Central Valley, and
maybe
a couple in the inland empire. That is about it. CA is one state where the salience of economic issues for Pubs is very high - and for good reason. Also the primary is closed, so we won't have any mischief voters, like happened in Ohio and particularly Michigan.
Newt by the way says he is going to Tampa even if he loses both Alabama and Mississippi. I think he means it. He is not in this race at this point to win the nomination. He's in it for the klieg lights.
«
Last Edit: March 10, 2012, 09:36:16 pm by Torie
»
Logged
ajb
YaBB God
Posts: 872
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #252 on:
March 10, 2012, 09:32:43 pm »
Quote from: Torie on March 10, 2012, 08:55:21 pm
Quote from: ajb on March 10, 2012, 08:51:32 pm
Quote from: Torie on March 10, 2012, 08:42:13 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on March 10, 2012, 07:53:42 pm
Quote from: argentarius on March 10, 2012, 07:46:16 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on March 10, 2012, 07:35:34 pm
Quote from: argentarius on March 10, 2012, 06:48:36 pm
Quote from: Keystone Phil on March 10, 2012, 06:46:21 pm
A pretty much perfect result in Kansas. A disastrous result (though expected) for Romney's near candidate best friend. Hoping it affects MS and AL.
Bad? Certainly. Disastrous? That's pushing it. It's overshadowed by our ninja delegates.
You're a Newt supporter? Because he's to whom I was referring.
Really? I haven't heard Newt being called his best friend before. And I wouldn't call his showing disastrous either. He had no expectations and is focusing on the south.
He's his new best friend because he keeps the Anti Romney vote split.
Newt dropping out actually nets Mittens a few delegates
per Nate Silver
. Well, about 10 delegates net if Newt hadn't been in the race to start with, and not much if Newt drops out now. It is obvious when you think about it. If Mittens with everyone around is on track with the supers to get an absolute majority of the delegates, it doesn't matter who has the other 45% to 49% of them or whatever. In short, this whole if only one "conservative" were in the race meme against the suspiciously moderate Mittens (I have to laugh every time I hear that one - I'm a moderate - Mitttens isn't - period), has been and remains way over hyped. There is no there, there.
According to that same Nate Silver piece, Santorum would have gained 110 delegates relative to what he's currently got if Gingrich were not in the race, thus reducing the gap between him and Romney by about a hundred delegates. He would also, by Silver's argument, have won SC, GA, OH and AK.
No, those delegates just move from the Newt column to the Rick column, which is irrelevant to the Romney systems engineering delegate blueprint. Just add the Newt and Rick totals together and consider them one candidate. The only wild card delegates really are the Paul delegates in a brokered convention. Rick would just put Newt on his ticket if need be to get the Newt delegates. What a team!
If this is indeed the Romney blueprint, it's a faulty design. There's a non-trivial chance that Santorum in a Gingrich-free race might a) increase the odds of Romney not getting a majority of delegates, and b) actually start winning more votes, and delegates, than Romney himself. This would be a problem, assuming that the goal of the Romney blueprint is to elect a president, and not merely a presidential candidate.
Logged
LINCOLN REPUBLICAN
Winfield
YaBB God
Posts: 9839
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #253 on:
March 10, 2012, 09:55:28 pm »
Thank you Guam, from Mitt and myself.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 14758
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #254 on:
March 10, 2012, 10:07:09 pm »
Quote from: SANTORUM TO DEMS: VOTE FOR ME. YOU KNOW OBAMA WILL CRUSH ME. on March 10, 2012, 09:55:28 pm
Thank you Guam, from Mitt and myself.
I'm sure the entire island of Guam feels blessed to have Winfield's thanks.
Logged
What is your opinion of this thread?
Watch this video of Dave being briefed by the mods.
Quote from: Lunar on March 20, 2011, 10:58:04 am
Being a moderator is basically like one giant party. Except you're the one ruining the party and everyone hates you.
rbt48
YaBB God
Posts: 726
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #255 on:
March 10, 2012, 10:10:39 pm »
Which of the remaining primaries are open ones where Santorum could appeal to Democrats to vote for him?
Logged
R. Bruce Telfeyan
With patriotic fervor of an undiminished magnitude
http://www.rbt48.com/weather
http://www.rbt48.com/weather/Presidential_Elections/2012_State_Legislatures_post_election.pdf
http://www.rbt48.com/weather/Presidential_Elections/2012_Elections_Cong_Gov.pdf
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68061
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #256 on:
March 10, 2012, 10:42:11 pm »
Dammit Romney broke 20%. He gets delegates.
Logged
LINCOLN REPUBLICAN
Winfield
YaBB God
Posts: 9839
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #257 on:
March 10, 2012, 10:46:52 pm »
Quote from: rbt48 on March 10, 2012, 10:10:39 pm
Which of the remaining primaries are open ones where Santorum could appeal to Democrats to vote for him?
Grasping at straws now are we?
Logged
LINCOLN REPUBLICAN
Winfield
YaBB God
Posts: 9839
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #258 on:
March 10, 2012, 10:48:33 pm »
Quote from: The Old World Is Behind Us on March 10, 2012, 10:42:11 pm
Dammit Romney broke 20%. He gets delegates.
Logged
ajb
YaBB God
Posts: 872
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #259 on:
March 10, 2012, 10:52:52 pm »
Quote from: SANTORUM TO DEMS: VOTE FOR ME. YOU KNOW OBAMA WILL CRUSH ME. on March 10, 2012, 10:48:33 pm
Quote from: The Old World Is Behind Us on March 10, 2012, 10:42:11 pm
Dammit Romney broke 20%. He gets delegates.
And in the process helped Santorum to collect even more delegates than he would have if Romney had scored 19.9 instead of 20.9.
Logged
LINCOLN REPUBLICAN
Winfield
YaBB God
Posts: 9839
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #260 on:
March 10, 2012, 10:55:29 pm »
Quote from: rbt48 on March 10, 2012, 10:10:39 pm
Which of the remaining primaries are open ones where Santorum could appeal to Democrats to vote for him?
Open Contests
Alabama (50)
Arizona (Semi-closed, with primaries open only to unaffiliated or unrepresented voters, except for the Libertarian primary.)(57)
Arkansas (36)
Georgia (75)
Hawaii (Open primary for state, local, and congressional races; caucus system for presidential races.)(20)
Idaho (32)
Indiana (46)
Massachusetts (All races' primaries open for "unenrolled"/unaffiliated voters only)(41)
Michigan (59)
Mississippi (37)
Missouri (53)
South Carolina (50)
Tennessee (58)
Texas (152)
Vermont (17)
Virginia (49)
Wisconsin (42)
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68061
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #261 on:
March 10, 2012, 11:23:56 pm »
Quote from: ajb on March 10, 2012, 10:52:52 pm
Quote from: SANTORUM TO DEMS: VOTE FOR ME. YOU KNOW OBAMA WILL CRUSH ME. on March 10, 2012, 10:48:33 pm
Quote from: The Old World Is Behind Us on March 10, 2012, 10:42:11 pm
Dammit Romney broke 20%. He gets delegates.
And in the process helped Santorum to collect even more delegates than he would have if Romney had scored 19.9 instead of 20.9.
Howso? If Romney had failed to break 20% everyone but Santorum would fail viability and Santorum would take all delegates.
Logged
Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 14259
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #262 on:
March 10, 2012, 11:37:37 pm »
Quote from: The Old World Is Behind Us on March 10, 2012, 11:23:56 pm
Quote from: ajb on March 10, 2012, 10:52:52 pm
Quote from: SANTORUM TO DEMS: VOTE FOR ME. YOU KNOW OBAMA WILL CRUSH ME. on March 10, 2012, 10:48:33 pm
Quote from: The Old World Is Behind Us on March 10, 2012, 10:42:11 pm
Dammit Romney broke 20%. He gets delegates.
And in the process helped Santorum to collect even more delegates than he would have if Romney had scored 19.9 instead of 20.9.
Howso? If Romney had failed to break 20% everyone but Santorum would fail viability and Santorum would take all delegates.
If only one candidate got above 20% in Kansas, then delegates would have been awarded proportionally with no cutoff, so all four candidates would have split them.
Logged
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68061
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #263 on:
March 10, 2012, 11:45:45 pm »
Well that'd still mean less for Romney and some for Paul.
Logged
Jbrase
YaBB God
Posts: 4980
Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -6.09
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #264 on:
March 10, 2012, 11:58:12 pm »
Did all those blank counties on the google map just have 0 turnout?
Logged
ajb
YaBB God
Posts: 872
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #265 on:
March 11, 2012, 12:04:50 am »
Quote from: The Old World Is Behind Us on March 10, 2012, 11:45:45 pm
Well that'd still mean less for Romney and some for Paul.
Fewer delegates for both Romney and Santorum (basically, they would have had 2/10 and 5/10 of the at-large delegates, instead of 2/7 and 5/7). Since Santorum would have lost more delegates, the gap between the two of them would have narrowed.
Logged
Bacon King
Moderator
YaBB God
Posts: 14259
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #266 on:
March 11, 2012, 12:28:45 am »
Quote from: Jbrase on March 10, 2012, 11:58:12 pm
Did all those blank counties on the google map just have 0 turnout?
No; for whatever reason those counties didn't have a caucus. Republicans in those counties could apparently instead caucus at any other county in their congressional district, if they still wanted to participate.
Logged
Brandon H
brandonh
YaBB God
Posts: 4439
Political Matrix
E: 3.48, S: 1.74
Paul wins Virgin Islands popular vote
«
Reply #267 on:
March 11, 2012, 04:53:42 pm »
.... but looks like Romney won the most delegates.
384 total cast
112 to Paul (29%) Won one delegate
101 to Romney (26%) Won three delegates plus three RNC member pledge. (Pick up a uncommitted delegate after the balloting for a total of seven.)
23 to Santorm (6%) No delegates
18 to Gingrich (5%) No delegates
130 Uncommitted (34%) Two delegates but one changed to Romney after the vote totals were announced
http://vigop.com/
Logged
A Republican - at least for a little while
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
Posts: 7725
Re: Paul wins Virgin Islands popular vote
«
Reply #268 on:
March 11, 2012, 04:56:26 pm »
So, Uncommitted won the Virgin Islands popular vote.
Logged
The Professor
Jr. Member
Posts: 93
Re: Paul wins Virgin Islands popular vote
«
Reply #269 on:
March 11, 2012, 05:01:26 pm »
Not surprising Ron Paul won the Virgin Islands considering his supporters are most likely to be virgins.
Logged
State Comptroller Atkins
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
Posts: 7725
Re: Paul wins Virgin Islands popular vote
«
Reply #270 on:
March 11, 2012, 05:19:57 pm »
Quote from: The Professor on March 11, 2012, 05:01:26 pm
Not surprising Ron Paul won the Virgin Islands considering his supporters are most likely to be virgins.
Are there many in your class, Prof?
Logged
ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
Posts: 8363
Political Matrix
E: 5.42, S: -1.39
Re: Paul wins Virgin Islands popular vote
«
Reply #271 on:
March 11, 2012, 05:22:23 pm »
Quote from: Joseph Gordon Levitt on March 11, 2012, 05:19:57 pm
Quote from: The Professor on March 11, 2012, 05:01:26 pm
Not surprising Ron Paul won the Virgin Islands considering his supporters are most likely to be virgins.
Are there many in your class, Prof?
No, no virgins in his class, because he
does not
have a class :p
Logged
Thank You, Margaret Thatcher. You shall be missed.
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
Posts: 8964
Re: Paul wins Virgin Islands popular vote
«
Reply #272 on:
March 11, 2012, 05:23:53 pm »
Quote from: ChairmanSanchez on March 11, 2012, 05:22:23 pm
Quote from: Joseph Gordon Levitt on March 11, 2012, 05:19:57 pm
Quote from: The Professor on March 11, 2012, 05:01:26 pm
Not surprising Ron Paul won the Virgin Islands considering his supporters are most likely to be virgins.
Are there many in your class, Prof?
No, no virgins in his class, because he
does not
have a class :p
We actually established a while before you showed up that he may very well be an actual professor involved with some particularly surreal strand of postmodernism.
Logged
Quote from: Averroës Nix on October 18, 2012, 07:59:32 pm
Professor
Nathan: A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?
Quote from: Joe Republic on April 25, 2013, 03:29:18 pm
It's like one minute you're preaching from the pulpit at some exceedingly dull church; the next you're a giving a Womens' Studies lecture at Berkeley.
So the Heroes Fall
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68061
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #273 on:
March 11, 2012, 05:24:46 pm »
I wonder what he teaches. Sociology?
Logged
bgwah
YaBB God
Posts: 13403
Political Matrix
E: -4.52, S: -8.17
Re: March 10 Kansas + miscellaneous islands primary/caucus **results thread**
«
Reply #274 on:
March 11, 2012, 05:26:04 pm »
It's probably just someone like Aizen screwing around.
Logged
Pages:
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
[
11
]
12
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...