Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 23, 2016, 08:08:19 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Individual Politics (Moderators: Alcon, Torie, AndrewTXmas)
| | |-+  Political Matrix Question #1
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Poll
Question: The right to individual autonomy is important, even if it threatens collective security.
Agree   -8 (22.2%)
Usually Agree   -16 (44.4%)
Neutral   -4 (11.1%)
Usually Disagree   -3 (8.3%)
Disagree   -5 (13.9%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 36

Author Topic: Political Matrix Question #1  (Read 1251 times)
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9053
United States


View Profile
« on: March 11, 2012, 12:18:13 am »
Ignore

I'm kicking off a new series. Every three days, I'll post a new poll about the Political Matrix Questions, and see where the forum stands on the issue. When the series is complete, I'll uses the mode of each response to gather a sense of where the forum is politically.

Today, the question is whether or not you believe that "the right to individual autonomy is important, even if it threatens collective security."

Go.
Logged
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18392
United States
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2012, 12:25:05 am »
Ignore

Usually agree, and this is a critical issue to me.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 01:18:58 am by Senator Scott »Logged


Gabriel Cáceres

"He who feeds you, controls you." -Thomas Sankara
Jbrase
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6107
United States


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2012, 12:25:48 am »
Ignore

Agree
Logged
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2706
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2012, 12:39:49 am »
Ignore

Usually Agree
Logged
Snowstalker's Last Stand
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19395
Greece


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2012, 12:41:58 am »
Ignore

Neutral; it depends on what you are doing that's potentially harmful and the difference in power between the two. For instance, there's a difference between a couple having sex and a corporation sending its manufacturing plant to an Indian location where wages are 15 cents an hour.
Logged

Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18964
United States


Political Matrix
E: 0.65, S: -1.74

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2012, 01:03:05 am »
Ignore

Disagree.
Logged


realisticidealist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9410
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -0.39, S: 4.17


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2012, 01:09:11 am »
Ignore

Usually disagree.
Logged
I'm JewCon in name only.
Klecly
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 920
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 6.52

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2012, 01:12:20 am »
Ignore

Disagree.
Logged

Draper Sterling
Reginald
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 779


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2012, 01:48:44 am »
Ignore

This is a great idea!

Usually Agree
Logged

I did not see L.A.
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38822
United States


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2012, 04:59:18 am »
Ignore

Usually agree.
Logged


"For all those whose cares have been our concern, the work goes on, the cause endures, the hope still lives, and the dream shall never die."

-- Ted Kennedy
Averroës
Averroës Nix
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8512


Political Matrix
E: -2.70, S: -4.20


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2012, 09:43:24 am »
Ignore

Agree (critical issue).
Logged

R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24883
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.83

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2012, 10:25:54 am »
Ignore

Agree (critical issue).
Logged

k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11901
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2012, 10:26:03 am »
Ignore

Usually agree.
Logged
Pingvin
Pingvin99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2760
Estonia


Political Matrix
E: 8.71, S: 4.78


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2012, 10:29:30 am »
Ignore

Logged



"He shall appear to thee and thou shall understand,
He shall promise no salvation but let you see what is imminent."
freefair
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 739
United Kingdom


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2012, 11:41:01 am »
Ignore

Usually Agree.
Logged

If you're centrist to right wing do follow this link and participate in this timelime poll!!
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=186153.0
PM- Ecn +4.95 Soc -4.95
Pragmatically libertarian. Centrist by US standards, Tory in UK.
oreomilkshake
Ghost_white
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3963


Political Matrix
E: -1.42, S: 0.87

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2012, 03:40:50 pm »
Ignore

Disagree, having a strong sense of community - a "collective" to call your own whether it's family, tribe or nation[-state] is your only hope for freedom. I doubt there's even such thing as an inherent "right to individual autonomy," unless you're totally alone. There's just people that can defend themselves, and those that can't. Groups with power and those without. Those that look out for their interests and those that don't. Or to put it another way:

"Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldn’t be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you."
-The Gulag Archipelago
Logged
🍁 Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23011
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2012, 04:23:01 pm »
Ignore

Neutral - a balance is needed
Logged

http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com

Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10853
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2012, 04:57:43 pm »
Ignore

Option two.
Logged
morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6637
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2012, 05:49:31 pm »
Ignore

Usually agree.
Logged

RedPrometheus
Full Member
***
Posts: 240


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2012, 06:02:17 am »
Ignore

Usually agree.
Logged

Political Matrix

E: -7,74
S: -5,22
Violet Socialist
MOPolitico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1401
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: -2.97

View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2012, 04:28:17 pm »
Ignore

I have considerable difficulty responding to general philosophical statements like this, so could someone provide me with a scenario in which individual autonomy actually threatens collective security?
Logged
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18392
United States
View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2012, 04:50:09 pm »
Ignore

I have considerable difficulty responding to general philosophical statements like this, so could someone provide me with a scenario in which individual autonomy actually threatens collective security?

Basically what this question asks you is, do you value the community more than the individual, or the individual more than the community?  Do you put moral weight on the individual's ability to self-govern, or should you be guided by external forces like government and society?  I suppose one scenario that this question could apply to is taxes: should we surrender some of our autonomy (our complete ownership of money) in exchange for security, or should we not?

To understand which side generally agrees with what, check out the comments and Political Matrix scores of the posters here. Wink  It's probably too much to explain in one post, though. Tongue
Logged


Gabriel Cáceres

"He who feeds you, controls you." -Thomas Sankara
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2706
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2012, 05:30:58 pm »
Ignore

I have considerable difficulty responding to general philosophical statements like this, so could someone provide me with a scenario in which individual autonomy actually threatens collective security?

Some examples of political subjects where individual autonomy and collective security come into conflict are rights or entitlements to: free speech, privacy, protest against the government, due process in law, practice ones faith, affiliate with groups of ones choice, not be conscripted, decide not to let soldiers use ones home in a time of war, to be in a minority group without being persecuted or marginalized from participation in civic life, sympathize with or assist enemies of the state, pollute the environment, operate heavy machinery while under the influence of drugs, drive an automobile while talking on ones cell phone, peaceful support for the overthrow of the government, low or non-existent taxes, individual access to welfare benefits when in need, etc.
Logged
Violet Socialist
MOPolitico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1401
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.68, S: -2.97

View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2012, 06:21:19 pm »
Ignore

Thanks, guys. I consider society a collection of individuals working together to accomplish things that can be done better collectively than individually, so while society is justified in preventing people from doing things that might endanger the welfare of others, it must first be established beyond a shadow of a doubt that the encroachment upon individual freedom will indeed improve the collective, and the encroachment must not curb certain basic rights. In other words, it depends upon the situation. I guess that my answer to the question should be "neutral", then?
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4416
Thailand


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2012, 06:32:50 pm »
Ignore

Option 1.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines