Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
November 25, 2014, 11:55:42 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Individual Politics (Moderators: Grad Students are the Worst, Torie, Sheriff Buford TX Justice)
| | |-+  Political Matrix Question #1
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Poll
Question: The right to individual autonomy is important, even if it threatens collective security.
Agree   -8 (22.2%)
Usually Agree   -16 (44.4%)
Neutral   -4 (11.1%)
Usually Disagree   -3 (8.3%)
Disagree   -5 (13.9%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 36

Author Topic: Political Matrix Question #1  (Read 845 times)
Psychic Octopus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9170
United States


View Profile
« on: March 11, 2012, 12:18:13 am »
Ignore

I'm kicking off a new series. Every three days, I'll post a new poll about the Political Matrix Questions, and see where the forum stands on the issue. When the series is complete, I'll uses the mode of each response to gather a sense of where the forum is politically.

Today, the question is whether or not you believe that "the right to individual autonomy is important, even if it threatens collective security."

Go.
Logged

Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18750
United States
View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 11, 2012, 12:25:05 am »
Ignore

Usually agree, and this is a critical issue to me.
« Last Edit: March 11, 2012, 01:18:58 am by Senator Scott »Logged
Jbrase
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5952
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.32, S: -5.74


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 11, 2012, 12:25:48 am »
Ignore

Agree
Logged

Lol at those who think Barrow will lose.
Are they trying to fit in as many junk polls before Tuesday as possible?
Glorious news! even Quinnijunk can't get condom hater outside the margin of error, Udall is on track to deliver a good whipping[/q
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2561
United States


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2012, 12:39:49 am »
Ignore

Usually Agree
Logged

"I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to see realized." ~ Nelson Mandela
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17921
Burkina Faso


Political Matrix
E: -8.45, S: -4.26

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2012, 12:41:58 am »
Ignore

Neutral; it depends on what you are doing that's potentially harmful and the difference in power between the two. For instance, there's a difference between a couple having sex and a corporation sending its manufacturing plant to an Indian location where wages are 15 cents an hour.
Logged

Miles
MilesC56
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16098
United States


Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 5.74

P P P
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 11, 2012, 01:03:05 am »
Ignore

Disagree.
Logged


realisticidealist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6796
Vatican City State


Political Matrix
E: -0.13, S: 4.52

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 11, 2012, 01:09:11 am »
Ignore

Usually disagree.
Logged

"The greatest thing you'll ever learn is just to love and be loved in return."
I'm JewCon in name only.
Klecly
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 922
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 6.52

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 11, 2012, 01:12:20 am »
Ignore

Disagree.
Logged

Reginald
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 462


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 11, 2012, 01:48:44 am »
Ignore

This is a great idea!

Usually Agree
Logged

Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31303
France


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 11, 2012, 04:59:18 am »
Ignore

Usually agree.
Logged

HashCAN     americans saw the EP elections and people cringing at Europeans being morons and electing Nazis; so they massively said "NO" and decided to prove that they're still bigger morons



"A reformist is someone who realizes that, when you bang your head on a wall, it's the head that breaks rather than the wall."

Peppino, from the movie Baaria
АverroŽs Nix
AverroŽs Nix
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10147
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 11, 2012, 09:43:24 am »
Ignore

Agree (critical issue).
Logged

PS: I am using my late mother's Facebook account due to the difficulty of changing identities on Facebook. She has yet to complain.
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23413
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.48

View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 11, 2012, 10:25:54 am »
Ignore

Agree (critical issue).
Logged


I'm a teenaged male. Everything is wrong with me.
k-onmmunist
Winston Disraeli
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11972
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 11, 2012, 10:26:03 am »
Ignore

Usually agree.
Logged

IDS Legislator Pingvin
Pingvin99
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2417
Estonia


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 11, 2012, 10:29:30 am »
Ignore

Logged

freefair
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 709
United Kingdom


View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: March 11, 2012, 11:41:01 am »
Ignore

Usually Agree.
Logged

If you're centrist to right wing do follow this link and participate in this timelime poll!!
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=186153.0
PM- Ecn +4.95 Soc -4.95
Pragmatically libertarian. Centrist by US standards, Tory in UK.
ozona and sonora
Ghost_white
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3715


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: 6.61

View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 11, 2012, 03:40:50 pm »
Ignore

Disagree, having a strong sense of community - a "collective" to call your own whether it's family, tribe or nation[-state] is your only hope for freedom. I doubt there's even such thing as an inherent "right to individual autonomy," unless you're totally alone. There's just people that can defend themselves, and those that can't. Groups with power and those without. Those that look out for their interests and those that don't. Or to put it another way:

"Before the camps, I regarded the existence of nationality as something that shouldnít be noticed - nationality did not really exist, only humanity. But in the camps one learns: if you belong to a successful nation you are protected and you survive. If you are part of universal humanity - too bad for you."
-The Gulag Archipelago
Logged


That has got to be one of the most retarded proposals I have read on this forum.

Don't worry, I'm sure more will crop up shortly.
Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20853
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00


View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: March 11, 2012, 04:23:01 pm »
Ignore

Neutral - a balance is needed
Logged

http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com

Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8325
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: March 11, 2012, 04:57:43 pm »
Ignore

Option two.
Logged
morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5622
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 11, 2012, 05:49:31 pm »
Ignore

Usually agree.
Logged
RedPrometheus
Full Member
***
Posts: 196


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2012, 06:02:17 am »
Ignore

Usually agree.
Logged

Political Matrix

E: -7,74
S: -5,22
Mopsus
MOPolitico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1182
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.74, S: -5.97

P P P
View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2012, 04:28:17 pm »
Ignore

I have considerable difficulty responding to general philosophical statements like this, so could someone provide me with a scenario in which individual autonomy actually threatens collective security?
Logged
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18750
United States
View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2012, 04:50:09 pm »
Ignore

I have considerable difficulty responding to general philosophical statements like this, so could someone provide me with a scenario in which individual autonomy actually threatens collective security?

Basically what this question asks you is, do you value the community more than the individual, or the individual more than the community?  Do you put moral weight on the individual's ability to self-govern, or should you be guided by external forces like government and society?  I suppose one scenario that this question could apply to is taxes: should we surrender some of our autonomy (our complete ownership of money) in exchange for security, or should we not?

To understand which side generally agrees with what, check out the comments and Political Matrix scores of the posters here. Wink  It's probably too much to explain in one post, though. Tongue
Logged
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2561
United States


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2012, 05:30:58 pm »
Ignore

I have considerable difficulty responding to general philosophical statements like this, so could someone provide me with a scenario in which individual autonomy actually threatens collective security?

Some examples of political subjects where individual autonomy and collective security come into conflict are rights or entitlements to: free speech, privacy, protest against the government, due process in law, practice ones faith, affiliate with groups of ones choice, not be conscripted, decide not to let soldiers use ones home in a time of war, to be in a minority group without being persecuted or marginalized from participation in civic life, sympathize with or assist enemies of the state, pollute the environment, operate heavy machinery while under the influence of drugs, drive an automobile while talking on ones cell phone, peaceful support for the overthrow of the government, low or non-existent taxes, individual access to welfare benefits when in need, etc.
Logged

"I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to see realized." ~ Nelson Mandela
Mopsus
MOPolitico
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1182
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.74, S: -5.97

P P P
View Profile
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2012, 06:21:19 pm »
Ignore

Thanks, guys. I consider society a collection of individuals working together to accomplish things that can be done better collectively than individually, so while society is justified in preventing people from doing things that might endanger the welfare of others, it must first be established beyond a shadow of a doubt that the encroachment upon individual freedom will indeed improve the collective, and the encroachment must not curb certain basic rights. In other words, it depends upon the situation. I guess that my answer to the question should be "neutral", then?
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4443
Thailand


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2012, 06:32:50 pm »
Ignore

Option 1.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines