Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
January 20, 2017, 12:49:46 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your Ballot in the 2016 Mock Election

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  History (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Most horrible 20th century dictator
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Who was the most horrible dictator in the 20th century?
Iosif Stalin   -7 (20.6%)
Adolf Hitler   -19 (55.9%)
Pol Pot   -5 (14.7%)
Idi Amin   -0 (0%)
Mao Zedong   -1 (2.9%)
Kim Il Sung   -1 (2.9%)
Ho Chi Min   -0 (0%)
Fidel Castro   -1 (2.9%)
Nicola Ceauscescu   -0 (0%)
Benito Mussolini   -0 (0%)
Franscisco Franco   -0 (0%)
Other   -0 (0%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 34

Author Topic: Most horrible 20th century dictator  (Read 2223 times)
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10258
Denmark


View Profile
« on: March 20, 2012, 10:10:54 pm »
Ignore

Who was the most horrible dictator in the 20th century?
Logged

dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 26405
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2012, 05:33:51 am »
Ignore

Obviously it's one of the first two.  One could make decent arguments for Pol Pot or Mao.  I don't see how anybody else could make the cut.  I'm going to go with Stalin.
Logged

accept no imitations

(unless you post at the toxic place)
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 44692


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2012, 06:31:13 am »
Ignore

Hitler for starting the World War II. Hence, he had the worst and the biggest impact.

Of course, that doesn't make anyone else on this list more sympathetic.
Logged


"You're a bitter man," said Candide.
"That's because I've lived," said Martin.
RIP Jante's Law, FF
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 42699
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2012, 02:15:46 pm »
Ignore

When a certain degree of horribleness is reached, it becomes very hard to differentiate. It's like comparing two infinites. You know, like natural numbers and rational number. The latter are more numerous than the former, yet they're theoretically both the same number.

Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Kim have all crossed the line.
Logged

Our numbers are dwindling. Our words are confused.
Some of them have been twisted by the enemy
until they can no longer be recognized.

Now what is wrong, or false, in what we have said?
Just some parts, or everything?
On whom can we still rely? Are we survivors, cast
away by the current? Will we be left behind,
no longer understanding anyone and being understood by no one?
Must we rely on luck?

This is what you ask. Expect
no answer but your own.


Bertolt Brecht
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 44692


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2012, 03:00:30 pm »
Ignore

When a certain degree of horribleness is reached, it becomes very hard to differentiate. It's like comparing two infinites. You know, like natural numbers and rational number. The latter are more numerous than the former, yet they're theoretically both the same number.

Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Kim have all crossed the line.

Well, Hitler was worse than Pol Pot on one issue: Pol Pot didn't invade his neighbours.
Logged


"You're a bitter man," said Candide.
"That's because I've lived," said Martin.
Mechaman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14494
Jamaica
View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2012, 04:08:41 pm »
Ignore

When a certain degree of horribleness is reached, it becomes very hard to differentiate. It's like comparing two infinites. You know, like natural numbers and rational number. The latter are more numerous than the former, yet they're theoretically both the same number.

Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Kim have all crossed the line.

Well, Hitler was worse than Pol Pot on one issue: Pol Pot didn't invade his neighbours.

At least Pol Pot killed intellectuals equally too!
Logged

It's over.
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6811


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2012, 05:12:18 pm »
Ignore

The owner of Blondie
Logged
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15863
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2012, 05:14:09 pm »
Ignore

Hitler gets the gold, Stalin gets silver, and Mao gets bronze.  The others are (dis-)honorable mentions.  Tongue
Logged

Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2570
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2012, 08:58:49 pm »
Ignore

Hitler was bad, but he focused on other countries, and his doucheness was quarantined because of his need to focus on a multi-theatre world war.
Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
President: Gary Johnson
Senate:
Other:
Yelnoc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7039
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2012, 09:05:42 pm »
Ignore

Hitler was bad, but he focused on other countries, and his doucheness was quarantined because of his need to focus on a multi-theatre world war.
What?
Logged

politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10258
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2012, 09:21:42 pm »
Ignore

Hitler was bad, but he focused on other countries, and his doucheness was quarantined because of his need to focus on a multi-theatre world war.
What?
Yeah, weird way of putting it!!

But Stalin and Pol Pot certainly killed a larger part of their own population than Hitler and Mao is responsible for the death of more Chinese than Hitler killed Germans. So seen from a homeland perspective Hitler is not no. 1. Guess that's his point.
Logged

We're never gonna have it so good!
ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24693
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2012, 01:02:02 pm »
Ignore

Mao, followed by Hitler, Stalin, and Pol Pot.
Logged

A Hybrid of Pat Buchanan and Bob Dylan.
Vosem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9103
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.13, S: -6.26

P P

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 24, 2012, 01:16:37 pm »
Ignore

Have to go with Hitler.
Logged

I will NOT be accepting any result other than a victory for America's next President, Governor Gary Earl Johnson Angry
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 44692


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 24, 2012, 06:43:07 pm »
Ignore

Hitler was bad, but he focused on other countries

Sure, which makes him less horrible, because he killed more worthless foreigners than his own Aryan people.

Quote
and his doucheness was quarantined because of his need to focus on a multi-theatre world war.

I'm pretty sure Jews, Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, French, Yugoslavians, Belgians, etc. etc. were benefiting from this distraction.
Logged


"You're a bitter man," said Candide.
"That's because I've lived," said Martin.
The Final Days
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7518
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 24, 2012, 07:06:19 pm »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.
Logged

Why should I even have a signature?
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2697
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: March 24, 2012, 07:33:44 pm »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.

"Other" ^^
Logged
The Final Days
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7518
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 24, 2012, 07:38:54 pm »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.

"Other" ^^

I meant excluding Other.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2012, 11:06:10 pm by Cheesy Grits »Logged

Why should I even have a signature?
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15776
Nepal


Political Matrix
E: 2.06, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: March 25, 2012, 12:59:42 am »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.
probably Mussolini.
Logged
Night on the Galactic Mass Pike
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 18380


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 25, 2012, 03:09:53 am »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.

Castro or Mussolini, depending on what aspects you're focusing on. Next tier would probably be...Ho Chi Minh and Franco, maybe? Franco's getting into the territory that Antonio described but I'm not well-versed in his reign enough to know whether or not he's quite there.
Logged



Professor Nathan. A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights. Can you really trust him?

Yeah that's right, I said Siam. Why don't you go tell Pedro Martinez
RIP Jante's Law, FF
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 42699
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 25, 2012, 04:47:23 am »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.
probably Mussolini.

Yeah, Mussolini might get the prize. The Salo' era was pretty horrible, but fortunately it didn't last long.

It might be Ho Chi Min as well, I don't know much about how he ruled after his victory.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2012, 04:49:35 am by Antonio V »Logged

Our numbers are dwindling. Our words are confused.
Some of them have been twisted by the enemy
until they can no longer be recognized.

Now what is wrong, or false, in what we have said?
Just some parts, or everything?
On whom can we still rely? Are we survivors, cast
away by the current? Will we be left behind,
no longer understanding anyone and being understood by no one?
Must we rely on luck?

This is what you ask. Expect
no answer but your own.


Bertolt Brecht
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10258
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 25, 2012, 07:27:00 am »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.
Make your own thread instead of hijacking mine:-)
Most horrible is interesting because of the different criteria you can apply.
Hitler was responsible for the highest number of deaths if you give him sole responsibility for WW2. Mao killed the highest number of his own people (if you include starvation), Pol Pot killed the highest percentage of his own population and ruined his country's economy and social structure. If you combine the two criteria of killing the highest share of your own population and the highest number of your own population Stalin wins. Stalin also probably had the largest longtime negative impact and imprisoned and forcibly relocated most people. But Hitler is the conventional choice as the personification of evil. I would say Stalin if you combine all factors and Pol Pot if you focus on the amount of evil a dictator caused relative to the resources he had at his disposal.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2012, 07:46:56 am by politicus »Logged

RIP Jante's Law, FF
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 42699
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -3.83

View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 25, 2012, 08:10:51 am »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.
Make your own thread instead of hijacking mine:-)
Most horrible is interesting because of the different criteria you can apply.
Hitler was responsible for the highest number of deaths if you give him sole responsibility for WW2. Mao killed the highest number of his own people (if you include starvation), Pol Pot killed the highest percentage of his own population and ruined his country's economy and social structure. If you combine the two criteria of killing the highest share of your own population and the highest number of your own population Stalin wins. Stalin also probably had the largest longtime negative impact and imprisoned and forcibly relocated most people. But Hitler is the conventional choice as the personification of evil. I would say Stalin if you combine all factors and Pol Pot if you focus on the amount of evil a dictator caused relative to the resources he had at his disposal.

I think a case might be made for Kim Il-Sung regarding long-term impact. North Korea is a small country, but people have been starving for over 60 years because of him and his successors.
Logged

Our numbers are dwindling. Our words are confused.
Some of them have been twisted by the enemy
until they can no longer be recognized.

Now what is wrong, or false, in what we have said?
Just some parts, or everything?
On whom can we still rely? Are we survivors, cast
away by the current? Will we be left behind,
no longer understanding anyone and being understood by no one?
Must we rely on luck?

This is what you ask. Expect
no answer but your own.


Bertolt Brecht
I'm JewCon in name only.
Klecly
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 920
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 6.52

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 25, 2012, 03:10:18 pm »
Ignore

All of these are obviously despicable pieces of garbage, but I vote Hitler as the Spawn of Satan of the 20th century.

He started WW2, and he targeted and murdered specific groups of people through some of the most disturbing methods ever.

Stalin comes in 2nd, with Mao in third.

After that I don't know much, but  maybe Pol Pot in 4th?
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines