Puerto Rico-Republican Primary
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 19, 2024, 02:12:24 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2012 Elections
  Puerto Rico-Republican Primary
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]
Author Topic: Puerto Rico-Republican Primary  (Read 11451 times)
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #125 on: March 18, 2012, 10:31:50 PM »

My feelings on statehood have been reinforced tonight. These results are literally unbelievable for so many reasons.

These results are literally unbelievable only for those who still embrace the fantasy that Republicans would ever actually pick Santorum as their standard bearer.
Logged
Minnesota Mike
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,059


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #126 on: March 18, 2012, 10:46:22 PM »

Not that it matters when one candidate is getting 80%+ of the vote but the polls have been closed for nearly 7 hours and we only have 57% of the vote in? Did the fly in the vote counting team from Nevada?
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #127 on: March 18, 2012, 10:47:24 PM »

Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #128 on: March 18, 2012, 10:58:58 PM »


Reported for spreading hate propaganda.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #129 on: March 18, 2012, 11:01:09 PM »


Isn't there a rule that anything you quote and report won't get infracted?
Logged
Joe Republic
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 40,073
Ukraine


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #130 on: March 18, 2012, 11:05:17 PM »

He didn't even report it...
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,763


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #131 on: March 18, 2012, 11:07:28 PM »


Winfield does that a lot.
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #132 on: March 19, 2012, 12:01:16 AM »

Not serious about reporting, as others have done with me, but seriously Wormy, your use of Nazi propaganda with reference to Romney is entirely out of line and completely inappropriate.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #133 on: March 19, 2012, 12:05:43 AM »

Hilarious.
Logged
ag
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,828


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #134 on: March 19, 2012, 12:30:47 AM »

Well, on the page of the "Comisión Estatal de Elecciones", there is

Primarias Locales 2012 PNP
Primarias Locales 2012 PPD
Primaria Especial Senado PNP
Primarias Partido Republicano 2012.

No Democrats.

That doesn't answer my question.  The reason there are no Democrats is because Obama's nomination is not contested. But there is a quirk in the local party system that makes it a bit strange.

PPD is a pro-Commonwealth (pro-status quo) party, which is, essentially an affiliate of the (US) Democratic party - among its members the Republican supporters are either negligible or non-existent. However, the pro-statehood PNP is mixed: it's a coalition of those who in national politics think of themselves as Republicans and of pro-statehood Democrats. So, my question was, whether a PNP member, who would be showing up for the PNP caucus to select PNP candiates for local offices, but who is self-identified as a Democrat for the purposes of the US politics, would still vote in a Republican presidential election with his fellow PNP members, or would he only vote for the local candidates. It's a kind of a strange local PR version of the question, whether the caucus is open or closed Smiley))
Logged
Queen Mum Inks.LWC
Inks.LWC
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 35,011
United States


Political Matrix
E: 4.65, S: -2.78

P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #135 on: March 19, 2012, 12:50:30 AM »

Sadly it doesn't look like Karger will beat Gingrich.  I'm glad he didn't place last though.  It's pretty cool that he beat Paul.
Logged
MaxQue
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 12,625
Canada


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #136 on: March 19, 2012, 12:58:13 AM »

Well, on the page of the "Comisión Estatal de Elecciones", there is

Primarias Locales 2012 PNP
Primarias Locales 2012 PPD
Primaria Especial Senado PNP
Primarias Partido Republicano 2012.

No Democrats.

That doesn't answer my question.  The reason there are no Democrats is because Obama's nomination is not contested. But there is a quirk in the local party system that makes it a bit strange.

PPD is a pro-Commonwealth (pro-status quo) party, which is, essentially an affiliate of the (US) Democratic party - among its members the Republican supporters are either negligible or non-existent. However, the pro-statehood PNP is mixed: it's a coalition of those who in national politics think of themselves as Republicans and of pro-statehood Democrats. So, my question was, whether a PNP member, who would be showing up for the PNP caucus to select PNP candiates for local offices, but who is self-identified as a Democrat for the purposes of the US politics, would still vote in a Republican presidential election with his fellow PNP members, or would he only vote for the local candidates. It's a kind of a strange local PR version of the question, whether the caucus is open or closed Smiley))

CNN is saying than voters had a to sign a document saying than they approved the Republican values and ideology. So, open, to that condition.
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #137 on: March 19, 2012, 01:15:04 AM »

Romney is actually doing poorly by historical standards.

(And yes, the primaries were still competitive at that point, I checked...)
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #138 on: March 19, 2012, 02:44:28 AM »

Romney is actually doing poorly by historical standards.

(And yes, the primaries were still competitive at that point, I checked...)

Even Putin could only dream of such results.
Logged
Meeker
meekermariner
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,164


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #139 on: March 19, 2012, 02:49:18 AM »

In fact:

2000: Bush wins with 94%
2008: McCain wins with 90%

If any of us had bothered to look back at the historic results a blowout for the establishment frontrunner should've been obvious.
Logged
Eraserhead
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,460
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #140 on: March 19, 2012, 02:52:01 AM »

The question remains though: why the hell did Santorum campaign here?
Logged
Volrath50
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 814
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -5.57

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #141 on: March 19, 2012, 07:50:19 AM »

The question remains though: why the hell did Santorum campaign here?

The best explanation seems to be: he genuinely wanted a vacation.
Logged
ajb
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 869
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #142 on: March 19, 2012, 07:51:06 AM »

The question remains though: why the hell did Santorum campaign here?

This. If he was going to lose anyway, why not make it look like he lost on principle?


http://livewire.talkingpointsmemo.com/entries/santorum-blames-statehood-position-for-puerto-rico-loss
Logged
RI
realisticidealist
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,763


Political Matrix
E: 0.39, S: 2.61

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #143 on: March 19, 2012, 10:33:42 AM »
« Edited: March 19, 2012, 10:41:32 AM by realisticidealist »

In fact:

2000: Bush wins with 94%
2008: McCain wins with 90%

If any of us had bothered to look back at the historic results a blowout for the establishment frontrunner should've been obvious.

To the best of my knowledge, there have only been two genuinely competetive presidential primaries/caucuses in the history of Puerto Rico--three if you include 2008 for the Dems, which wasn't that close. The two competetive contests were in 1980 between Carter and Kennedy and in 1988 when Jackson won with >30%. Everything else has been a massive blowout.

2008 Dem: Clinton 68.42%, Obama 31.58%
2008 Rep: McCain 90.38%, Huckabee 4.81%, Paul 4.33%
2000 Rep: Bush 94.21%, McCain 5.29%
1996 Rep: Dole 97.99%
1992 Dem: Clinton 95.86%, Kerrey 1.43%, Brown 1.42%
1988 Dem: Jackson 31.98%, Dukakis 25.78%, Simon 21.01%, Gore 16.53%, Gephardt 3.34%
1984 Dem: Mondale 99.46%, Hart 0.54%
1980 Dem: Carter 51.67%, Kennedy 48.04%
Logged
minionofmidas
Lewis Trondheim
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 58,206
India


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #144 on: March 19, 2012, 01:12:11 PM »

In fact:

2000: Bush wins with 94%
2008: McCain wins with 90%

If any of us had bothered to look back at the historic results a blowout for the establishment frontrunner should've been obvious.
And if you add in that Santorum's "campaign" basically consisted of telling Puertoricans to speak Inglés if they want to be Americans but that they're still cool to vacation on - that is, basically consisted of telling them to vote for whoever had the best chance to beat him - and wonder what sort of appeal, exactly, Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul were supposed to have, then, um, yeah.
Logged
Wisconsin+17
Ben Kenobi
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,134
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #145 on: March 19, 2012, 01:25:06 PM »

So, Romney < Mondale.
Logged
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.043 seconds with 12 queries.