Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2016, 05:08:30 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Please delete your old personal messages.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections
| | |-+  Final planned debate cancelled
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Final planned debate cancelled  (Read 642 times)
Likely Voter
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7604


View Profile
« on: March 18, 2012, 12:55:33 pm »
Ignore

We all assumed this would happen, but now it is official (via UPI)
Quote
The Republican presidential debate scheduled for Monday in Oregon has been canceled, state GOP Chairman Allen Alley said.

"At this point in the race, there has been a shift in the flow of the campaigns from the debate environment to a strategic state-by-state approach," Alley said in a release. "It is clear that the Republican presidential campaign has entered a new phase where the candidates do not want to debate each other."

The debate, sponsored by The Washington Times, Oregon Public Broadcasting and the Oregon Republican Party, would have been the 21st debate of the primary.

The Times said Mitt Romney and Rick Santorum couldn't commit to the debate, while Newt Gingrich and Ron Paul had agreed to participate.

Apparently Romney said no first, and then Santorum followed. I think Rick should have agreed and then called Romney a wimp.
Logged
Jax27
Rookie
*
Posts: 26
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 18, 2012, 12:58:35 pm »
Ignore

I want 10 debates against Obama.
Logged
Joe Republic
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33100
Kiribati


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 18, 2012, 01:06:02 pm »
Ignore

I want 10 debates against Obama.

You'll have to run for president first, champ.
Logged

Gass3268
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7983
United States


Political Matrix
E: -7.55, S: -8.26


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 18, 2012, 01:46:59 pm »
Ignore

I want 10 debates against Obama.

I would love to see Obama debate these clowns 10 times.
Logged



Free Scotland & Unify Ireland!
Jax27
Rookie
*
Posts: 26
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 18, 2012, 02:20:23 pm »
Ignore

I want 10 debates against Obama.

You'll have to run for president first, champ.

Lol I meant 10 debates between Obama and Romney. The problem is though that winning is based on which candidate a viewer identifies with more. I'll agree with Romney more so I'll think he made better points and the Democrats will think Obama won because they'll agree with him on more things.
Logged
Torie
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33747
Samoa


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 18, 2012, 04:10:22 pm »
Ignore

Mittens doesn't want to take the risk (and maybe he believes the polls that what remains of Newt's strength would split between him and Rick, so further erosion of Newt would not hurt him), and Rick of course doesn't want to give Newt any oxygen at all; he wants him asphyxiated. 
Logged

Likely Voter
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7604


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 18, 2012, 04:47:52 pm »
Ignore

Mittens doesn't want to take the risk (and maybe he believes the polls that what remains of Newt's strength would split between him and Rick, so further erosion of Newt would not hurt him), and Rick of course doesn't want to give Newt any oxygen at all; he wants him asphyxiated. 

Good point, but I imagine Rick would have said yes if Gingrich had dropped out.

But once Romney said no, Rick lost a chance to make it into an issue that Romney is pussing out
Logged
useful idiot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3725


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 18, 2012, 05:05:56 pm »
Ignore

I want 10 debates against Obama.

You'll have to run for president first, champ.

I meant 10 debates between Obama and Romney.

So you want an Obama landslide, then?
Logged
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines