Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 01, 2014, 07:29:22 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  Political Debate (Moderator: Beet)
| | |-+  Most successful post-Cold War foreign policy?
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Most successful post-Cold War foreign policy?  (Read 1992 times)
#Ready4Nixon
Cathcon
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14932
United States


View Profile
« on: March 18, 2012, 03:02:52 pm »
Ignore

Of the four Presidents we've had since the fall of the Berlin Wall (1989) and the collapse of the Soviet Union (1991), which President has had the most successful  foreign policy? The options we're given are
-George H.W. Bush (1989-1993)
-William Jefferson Clinton (1993-2001)
-George W. Bush (2001-2009)
-Barack Obama (2009-?)

Please state your opinions and give the reasons why.
Logged

Vosem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5051
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 19, 2012, 06:02:32 am »
Ignore

The latter Bush actually overthrew the Taliban and Hussein, so probably him. None of them were bad.
Logged
Planet Earth is blue and there's nothing I can do
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5770


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2012, 02:16:15 pm »
Ignore

Bill Clinton.

Dayton Accords, Good Friday Agreement, and a couple of other treaties come to mind. His efforts to solve the Middle East problem were in large parts in vain, but at least it resulted in a lasting peace between Israel and Jordan.



The latter Bush actually overthrew the Taliban and Hussein, so probably him. None of them were bad.

"Overthrown" is at best an exaggaration. Temporarily weakened maybe.
Logged

dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21609
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2012, 04:32:26 am »
Ignore

Probably Clinton, but even he had his faults.  Trying to feed Somalia, and then abandoning them when some bastards shot at us wasn't exactly a triumph.
Logged

Quote from:   Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21808
Germany


Political Matrix
E: -7.55, S: -7.91

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 22, 2012, 08:10:16 am »
Ignore

Jesus Christ none of the above.
Logged

Carlos Danger
wormyguy
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8404
Liechtenstein


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 22, 2012, 11:45:32 am »
Ignore

Bush I by default,* but yuck.

*Least inclined to grovel for the Israelis.
Logged

a real human being
Ghost_white
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3591


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: 5.91

View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 22, 2012, 01:22:45 pm »
Ignore

Bush I by default,* but yuck.

*Least inclined to grovel for the Israelis.
Logged


That has got to be one of the most retarded proposals I have read on this forum.

Don't worry, I'm sure more will crop up shortly.
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2471
United States


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 22, 2012, 03:03:36 pm »
Ignore

George H.W. Bush - mostly since Bill Clinton did not get us involved in Rwanda and both the latter Bush, and now Obama, have pursued the War on Terror in a manner I find unsettling.
Logged

"I have cherished the ideal of a democratic and free society in which all persons live together in harmony with equal opportunities. It is an ideal which I hope to live for and to see realized." ~ Nelson Mandela
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1265


P
View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 27, 2012, 09:25:23 am »
Ignore

I would say either Bush Senior of Bill Clinton.
Logged
Snowstalker
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17008


Political Matrix
E: -8.45, S: -4.26

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2012, 08:38:13 pm »
Ignore

Bush Sr. by default, with Obama in second. Clinton should have gone into Rwanda and should not have gone into Yugoslavia, and Bush II was the biggest supporter of war profiteering ever.
Logged
WillK
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1291


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 03, 2012, 02:46:14 pm »
Ignore

Probably Clinton, but even he had his faults.  Trying to feed Somalia, and then abandoning them when some bastards shot at us wasn't exactly a triumph.

It was Bush Sr who sent US troops into Somalia; Clinton inherited the situation.   
Logged
Rooney
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 701
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 04, 2012, 01:53:46 pm »
Ignore

Since post-Cold War American foreign policy has pretty much been the U.S. sends troops to prop up/remove a dictator or intervening in some cause that is selectively called "ethnic cleansing" by the foreign policy elite is it not debatable that President G.W. Bush was the most successful? After all he took that to the logical extreme. 
Logged



Political Matrix:
Economic score: +8.65
Social score: -8.00
--
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 36851
View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 04, 2012, 02:21:35 pm »
Ignore

Clinton's foreign policy was extremely incoherent. He had periods of interventionism, semi-isolationism and multilateralism.
Logged
Mechaman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13733
Jamaica


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 04, 2012, 03:36:12 pm »
Ignore

Clinton's foreign policy was extremely incoherent. He had periods of interventionism, semi-isolationism and multilateralism.

Bill Clinton's foreign policy was whatever the Gallup Gods dictated.
Logged

WillK
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1291


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 04, 2012, 09:54:16 pm »
Ignore

Since post-Cold War American foreign policy has pretty much been the U.S. sends troops to prop up/remove a dictator or intervening in some cause that is selectively called "ethnic cleansing" by the foreign policy elite is it not debatable that President G.W. Bush was the most successful? After all he took that to the logical extreme. 
But were his wars as successful as his fathers wars?
 
Seems to me that Panama and Gulf War1  were more successful than Afghanistan and GulfWar2
Logged
Cobbler
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 808
United States


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: April 07, 2012, 08:12:25 pm »
Ignore

GHW Bush, Obama, Clinton and then Dubya.
Logged


Quote
Economic score: +2.19
Social score: -5.74
Purch
Full Member
***
Posts: 196


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 10, 2012, 05:30:03 am »
Ignore

Are we talking about the same Bill Clinton who bombed the crap out of Iraq throughout his whole impeachment vote? Not to mention the missiles he dropped on on Afghanistan. And to answer the Op they were all just horrible.
Logged

Those gravestones don't say democrat or republican those gravestones say American.
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21609
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 10, 2012, 06:31:37 am »
Ignore

Probably Clinton, but even he had his faults.  Trying to feed Somalia, and then abandoning them when some bastards shot at us wasn't exactly a triumph.

It was Bush Sr who sent US troops into Somalia; Clinton inherited the situation.   
Well, it was the UN (voting unanimously) who sent the troops and food in, but yes, it was Bush the First who really pushed the issue.  It was Clinton that told the men on the ground that they couldn't use armor or proper air support.  It was Clinton that pussed out when that decision lead to the deaths of a many hundreds of Somalians and 18 Americans.

(of course those numbers pale when compared to the hundreds of thousands who starved to death or died in the ensuing civil war...not to mention the hundreds of thousands that have died since....obviously it's not all Clinton's fault, the asshats from there trying to enforce their idiotic rules on the locals deserve the lion's share of the blame)
Logged

Quote from:   Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
a real human being
Ghost_white
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3591


Political Matrix
E: -3.87, S: 5.91

View Profile
« Reply #18 on: April 10, 2012, 06:37:53 am »
Ignore

Are we talking about the same Bill Clinton who bombed the crap out of Iraq throughout his whole impeachment vote? Not to mention the missiles he dropped on on Afghanistan. And to answer the Op they were all just horrible.
Sanctions on Iraq murdered many more than his bombs did. But it's okay, it was to spread "freedom and democracy" so that means it was totally worth it.
Logged


That has got to be one of the most retarded proposals I have read on this forum.

Don't worry, I'm sure more will crop up shortly.
Purch
Full Member
***
Posts: 196


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 10, 2012, 09:08:17 am »
Ignore

Are we talking about the same Bill Clinton who bombed the crap out of Iraq throughout his whole impeachment vote? Not to mention the missiles he dropped on on Afghanistan. And to answer the Op they were all just horrible.
Sanctions on Iraq murdered many more than his bombs did. But it's okay, it was to spread "freedom and democracy" so that means it was totally worth it.

Exactly, I'm not saying Cliton was the worst, I'm saying picking any of these President's is impossible because it's not one foreign policy that made our relationship with the middle east so bad(It takes a bipartisan effort to screw things up this badly over a span of about 3 decades).. It's a combination of these administrations and their constant interference in  middle eastern affairs.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2012, 09:13:12 am by Purch »Logged

Those gravestones don't say democrat or republican those gravestones say American.
SJoyce of Harrenhal
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8792
United States


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 15, 2012, 06:55:18 pm »
Ignore

Jesus Christ none of the above.

This, and, are those my only choices?
Logged

Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1265


P
View Profile
« Reply #21 on: April 17, 2012, 12:30:18 am »
Ignore

This, and, are those my only choices?

Yes. Those are the only post-Cold War Presidents we've had thus far.
Logged
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11194
Russian Federation


View Profile WWW
« Reply #22 on: April 17, 2012, 02:42:16 pm »
Ignore

Are we talking about the same Bill Clinton who bombed the crap out of Iraq throughout his whole impeachment vote? Not to mention the missiles he dropped on on Afghanistan. And to answer the Op they were all just horrible.
Sanctions on Iraq murdered many more than his bombs did. But it's okay, it was to spread "freedom and democracy" so that means it was totally worth it.
I don't remember the democracy argument being made for Iraq sanctions in the 90s. It was always about stopping Saddam from reconstituting military power.
Logged

morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5300
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 17, 2012, 08:37:11 pm »
Ignore

None of them really. Obama was the least repulsive of the three, IMO (Bush Snr. doesn't really count as he was voted out of office after a year)
Logged
Senator TNF
TNF
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9542
Palestinian Territory, Occupied


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 19, 2012, 12:19:17 am »
Ignore

Clinton's foreign policy was extremely incoherent. He had periods of interventionism, semi-isolationism and multilateralism.

Bill Clinton's foreign policy was whatever the Gallup Gods dictated.

Much like everything else about Clinton's presidency, of course.

I think Bush I had the best, followed by Obama, then Clinton, and then Bush II.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines