Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 31, 2015, 06:56:16 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  Constitution and Law (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Florida's Stand Your Ground Law
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: What should Florida do about their Stand Your Ground Law?
Keep It   -6 (22.2%)
Get Rid Of It   -11 (40.7%)
Amend It   -10 (37%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 27

Author Topic: Florida's Stand Your Ground Law  (Read 711 times)
gunnut
Rookie
*
Posts: 26
United States


View Profile
« on: July 23, 2012, 12:43:46 pm »
Ignore

After much controversy over this law that has protected some but endangered most, I've decided to do a poll. Personally, I believe it could protect some people if it wasn't so vague.
Logged

Quote from:  Edward Gibbon
Religion is regarded by the common people as true, by the wise as false, and by the rulers as useful.


Quote from:  Albert Einstein
Those who have never failed have never tried anything new.

Quote from:  Lucius Annaeus Seneca
Luck is what happens when preparation meets opportunity.

Quote from:  Ronald Reagan
You can tell a lot about a fellow's character by the way he eats jelly beans.
Vosem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6232
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: July 23, 2012, 07:42:17 pm »
Ignore

Keep, of course, just like the people of Florida want. Unfortunately it seems on this forum so far I'm in a minority of one.
Logged

They should ban Russians from driving. Russians all drive like deranged lunatics who belong in a mental asylum to begin with.
Franzl
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22412
Germany


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: July 23, 2012, 09:18:37 pm »
Ignore

This is the kind of question that would be considered a sick joke in most places.
Logged
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29711
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: July 23, 2012, 10:01:37 pm »

It needs to be amended to make clear that following someone does not invoke the stand your ground provisions if the person you are following turns to confront you.
Logged

did the Speaker spend his entire winter in a tanning salon, hibernating?
The one thing everyone can agree on is that the media is biased against them.
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22837
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #4 on: July 24, 2012, 12:20:18 am »
Ignore

It needs to be amended to make clear that following someone does not invoke the stand your ground provisions if the person you are following turns to confront you.
this
Logged

Win32
Rookie
*
Posts: 41


View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: July 24, 2012, 12:37:35 am »
Ignore

I can't see any reason why the right to stand your ground should turn on whether you were following someone. If the person simply confronts you, that is one thing. If he moves to attack you, that is quite another.

That said, I haven't so much as glanced at the text of the statute, so I abstain from voting.
Logged

HagridOfTheDeep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5518
Canada


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: July 24, 2012, 12:45:22 am »
Ignore

Keep, of course, just like the people of Florida want. Unfortunately it seems on this forum so far I'm in a minority of one.

Well, you're not completely alone.
Logged

True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29711
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: July 24, 2012, 09:12:40 am »

I can't see any reason why the right to stand your ground should turn on whether you were following someone. If the person simply confronts you, that is one thing. If he moves to attack you, that is quite another.

It's simple enough even a Republican should be able to understand.  When Martin turned to confront the person following him, he became the person standing his ground, not Zimmerman.
Logged

did the Speaker spend his entire winter in a tanning salon, hibernating?
The one thing everyone can agree on is that the media is biased against them.
Win32
Rookie
*
Posts: 41


View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: July 24, 2012, 09:44:07 am »
Ignore

I haven't delved into the facts of the Martin-Zimmerman case, which don't seem relevant here. But following someone, by itself and without more, is no threat of force, and certainly does not prevent the pursued from standing his ground. Indeed, in a typical case it means you want the person to stay situated, so you can talk to him.
Logged

Bacon King
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 16826
United States


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2012, 12:46:41 pm »
Ignore

I'm mostly ambivalent on Castle Doctrine laws, but a duty should retreat should definitely exist when not on one's own property.
Logged

BK without all the crazy drugs just wouldn't be BK.
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 24711
Sweden


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.83

View Profile
« Reply #10 on: August 04, 2012, 08:24:08 pm »
Ignore

Voted Amend It, should keep it.
Logged


Reaction from ISIS:

Oh Crap

Reaction from JCL:

Tea Party in the hizzau
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines