Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 31, 2015, 06:23:05 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  History (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Most horrible 20th century dictator
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Poll
Question: Who was the most horrible dictator in the 20th century?
Iosif Stalin   -7 (20.6%)
Adolf Hitler   -19 (55.9%)
Pol Pot   -5 (14.7%)
Idi Amin   -0 (0%)
Mao Zedong   -1 (2.9%)
Kim Il Sung   -1 (2.9%)
Ho Chi Min   -0 (0%)
Fidel Castro   -1 (2.9%)
Nicola Ceauscescu   -0 (0%)
Benito Mussolini   -0 (0%)
Franscisco Franco   -0 (0%)
Other   -0 (0%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 34

Author Topic: Most horrible 20th century dictator  (Read 1494 times)
Charlotte Hebdo
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8190
Denmark


View Profile
« on: March 20, 2012, 10:10:54 pm »
Ignore

Who was the most horrible dictator in the 20th century?
Logged

dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22837
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2012, 05:33:51 am »
Ignore

Obviously it's one of the first two.  One could make decent arguments for Pol Pot or Mao.  I don't see how anybody else could make the cut.  I'm going to go with Stalin.
Logged

Jim Bolivar di Griz
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39105


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2012, 06:31:13 am »
Ignore

Hitler for starting the World War II. Hence, he had the worst and the biggest impact.

Of course, that doesn't make anyone else on this list more sympathetic.
Logged

Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33120
France


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2012, 02:15:46 pm »
Ignore

When a certain degree of horribleness is reached, it becomes very hard to differentiate. It's like comparing two infinites. You know, like natural numbers and rational number. The latter are more numerous than the former, yet they're theoretically both the same number.

Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Kim have all crossed the line.
Logged

Jim Bolivar di Griz
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39105


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2012, 03:00:30 pm »
Ignore

When a certain degree of horribleness is reached, it becomes very hard to differentiate. It's like comparing two infinites. You know, like natural numbers and rational number. The latter are more numerous than the former, yet they're theoretically both the same number.

Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Kim have all crossed the line.

Well, Hitler was worse than Pol Pot on one issue: Pol Pot didn't invade his neighbours.
Logged

Stone Cold Conservative
Mechaman
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14335
Jamaica


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2012, 04:08:41 pm »
Ignore

When a certain degree of horribleness is reached, it becomes very hard to differentiate. It's like comparing two infinites. You know, like natural numbers and rational number. The latter are more numerous than the former, yet they're theoretically both the same number.

Hitler, Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot and Kim have all crossed the line.

Well, Hitler was worse than Pol Pot on one issue: Pol Pot didn't invade his neighbours.

At least Pol Pot killed intellectuals equally too!
Logged



Austin 3:16 says I just whooped your ass!
I want my friggin hoverboard!
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6154


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2012, 05:12:18 pm »
Ignore

The owner of Blondie
Logged
Frodo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14057
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2012, 05:14:09 pm »
Ignore

Hitler gets the gold, Stalin gets silver, and Mao gets bronze.  The others are (dis-)honorable mentions.  Tongue
Logged

Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2565
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 22, 2012, 08:58:49 pm »
Ignore

Hitler was bad, but he focused on other countries, and his doucheness was quarantined because of his need to focus on a multi-theatre world war.
Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
President: Chris Christie
Senate:
Governor:

------------------------------



[img]https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/474x/4a/6a/03/4a6a039f4e813796b7731510707a5e4b.jpg[
Yelnoc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6776
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #9 on: March 22, 2012, 09:05:42 pm »
Ignore

Hitler was bad, but he focused on other countries, and his doucheness was quarantined because of his need to focus on a multi-theatre world war.
What?
Logged

Your Atlas experience will be 100x better if you turn signatures off. Trust me.
Charlotte Hebdo
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8190
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 22, 2012, 09:21:42 pm »
Ignore

Hitler was bad, but he focused on other countries, and his doucheness was quarantined because of his need to focus on a multi-theatre world war.
What?
Yeah, weird way of putting it!!

But Stalin and Pol Pot certainly killed a larger part of their own population than Hitler and Mao is responsible for the death of more Chinese than Hitler killed Germans. So seen from a homeland perspective Hitler is not no. 1. Guess that's his point.
Logged

ChairmanSanchez
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 17618
United States


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 23, 2012, 01:02:02 pm »
Ignore

Mao, followed by Hitler, Stalin, and Pol Pot.
Logged

A Hybrid of Pat Buchanan and Bob Dylan.
Debbie Wasserman Schultz stole my car, embezzled my life savings, killed my parents, and raped my dog. Lois Frankel was the getaway driver.
Vosem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6229
United States


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 24, 2012, 01:16:37 pm »
Ignore

Have to go with Hitler.
Logged

They should ban Russians from driving. Russians all drive like deranged lunatics who belong in a mental asylum to begin with.
Jim Bolivar di Griz
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 39105


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 24, 2012, 06:43:07 pm »
Ignore

Hitler was bad, but he focused on other countries

Sure, which makes him less horrible, because he killed more worthless foreigners than his own Aryan people.

Quote
and his doucheness was quarantined because of his need to focus on a multi-theatre world war.

I'm pretty sure Jews, Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, French, Yugoslavians, Belgians, etc. etc. were benefiting from this distraction.
Logged

Clean Meat Cheap
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6309
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 24, 2012, 07:06:19 pm »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.
Logged

Play the song backwards, and you hear the devil laugh. Even worse, play it forward, and you hear Nickelback!
Redalgo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2684
United States


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: March 24, 2012, 07:33:44 pm »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.

"Other" ^^
Logged
Clean Meat Cheap
The Obamanation
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6309
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: March 24, 2012, 07:38:54 pm »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.

"Other" ^^

I meant excluding Other.
« Last Edit: March 26, 2012, 11:06:10 pm by Cheesy Grits »Logged

Play the song backwards, and you hear the devil laugh. Even worse, play it forward, and you hear Nickelback!
shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 12935
Nepal


View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: March 25, 2012, 12:59:42 am »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.
probably Mussolini.
Logged

sex-negative feminist prude
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13856


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: March 25, 2012, 03:09:53 am »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.

Castro or Mussolini, depending on what aspects you're focusing on. Next tier would probably be...Ho Chi Minh and Franco, maybe? Franco's getting into the territory that Antonio described but I'm not well-versed in his reign enough to know whether or not he's quite there.
Logged

A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights.

I didn't really read it, tbh.
Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33120
France


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: March 25, 2012, 04:47:23 am »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.
probably Mussolini.

Yeah, Mussolini might get the prize. The Salo' era was pretty horrible, but fortunately it didn't last long.

It might be Ho Chi Min as well, I don't know much about how he ruled after his victory.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2012, 04:49:35 am by Antonio V »Logged

Charlotte Hebdo
politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8190
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: March 25, 2012, 07:27:00 am »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.
Make your own thread instead of hijacking mine:-)
Most horrible is interesting because of the different criteria you can apply.
Hitler was responsible for the highest number of deaths if you give him sole responsibility for WW2. Mao killed the highest number of his own people (if you include starvation), Pol Pot killed the highest percentage of his own population and ruined his country's economy and social structure. If you combine the two criteria of killing the highest share of your own population and the highest number of your own population Stalin wins. Stalin also probably had the largest longtime negative impact and imprisoned and forcibly relocated most people. But Hitler is the conventional choice as the personification of evil. I would say Stalin if you combine all factors and Pol Pot if you focus on the amount of evil a dictator caused relative to the resources he had at his disposal.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2012, 07:46:56 am by politicus »Logged

Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 33120
France


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: March 25, 2012, 08:10:51 am »
Ignore

Better question: Least horrible. Regarding that list, of course.
Make your own thread instead of hijacking mine:-)
Most horrible is interesting because of the different criteria you can apply.
Hitler was responsible for the highest number of deaths if you give him sole responsibility for WW2. Mao killed the highest number of his own people (if you include starvation), Pol Pot killed the highest percentage of his own population and ruined his country's economy and social structure. If you combine the two criteria of killing the highest share of your own population and the highest number of your own population Stalin wins. Stalin also probably had the largest longtime negative impact and imprisoned and forcibly relocated most people. But Hitler is the conventional choice as the personification of evil. I would say Stalin if you combine all factors and Pol Pot if you focus on the amount of evil a dictator caused relative to the resources he had at his disposal.

I think a case might be made for Kim Il-Sung regarding long-term impact. North Korea is a small country, but people have been starving for over 60 years because of him and his successors.
Logged

I'm JewCon in name only.
Klecly
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 922
United States


Political Matrix
E: 9.61, S: 6.52

View Profile
« Reply #22 on: March 25, 2012, 03:10:18 pm »
Ignore

All of these are obviously despicable pieces of garbage, but I vote Hitler as the Spawn of Satan of the 20th century.

He started WW2, and he targeted and murdered specific groups of people through some of the most disturbing methods ever.

Stalin comes in 2nd, with Mao in third.

After that I don't know much, but  maybe Pol Pot in 4th?
Logged

Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines