Greatest military leader in history
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
March 28, 2024, 12:52:35 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  General Discussion
  History (Moderator: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee)
  Greatest military leader in history
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2
Poll
Question: Who was the best military leader?
#1
Zhukov
 
#2
Alexander the Great
 
#3
Attila the Hun
 
#4
Napoleon Bonaparte
 
#5
Robert E. Lee
 
#6
Rommel
 
#7
Ghengis Khan
 
#8
Joan of Arc
 
#9
Saladin
 
#10
Hannibal
 
#11
Julius Caesar
 
#12
Other
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 26

Author Topic: Greatest military leader in history  (Read 6392 times)
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,174
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: March 25, 2012, 02:42:24 PM »
« edited: March 25, 2012, 04:52:44 PM by politicus »

An impossible question since the conditions they operated under where so different. But give it a shot. Who were the greatest commander of all times?
Logged
WillK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,276


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: March 25, 2012, 08:43:38 PM »

Perhaps P.C. Scipio or Subotai

Others that I would put ahead of your list are:
Maurice de Saxe   
Gustavus Adolphus
Francois Eugene (Prince of Savoy)
Arthur Wellesley (Duke of Wellington)
John Churchill (Duke of Marlborough)
Kalid ibn Al-Walid
Cyrus the Great




Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: March 25, 2012, 08:47:16 PM »

Horatio Nelson- Admirals always get overshadowed by Generals in these discussions
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,080
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: March 25, 2012, 10:18:49 PM »

Ghengis gets my pick....though I probably like Hannibal the most.  One could also make good arguments for Alexander and Zhukov.  Joan and Saladin are way out of their league here.
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,248


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: March 25, 2012, 10:45:43 PM »

Subutai on land, probably Nelson on water.
Logged
Cory
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3,709


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: March 26, 2012, 04:05:26 AM »

Napoleon. Hands down. He was self-made unlike people like say Alexander (who is massively overrated anyways).

Him any maybe Erich Von Mainstien.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,174
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: March 26, 2012, 07:58:20 AM »
« Edited: March 26, 2012, 08:00:18 AM by politicus »

Horatio Nelson- Admirals always get overshadowed by Generals in these discussions
Good point. But I think it is because their actions are generally less important. Naval battles can of course be crucial (and often has been), but most wars are after all decided by military campaigns on land.
Nelson is without doubt the greatest naval commander of all times.
Logged
Insula Dei
belgiansocialist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,326
Belgium


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: March 26, 2012, 10:35:52 AM »

Depends on the criteria you're using. Are you looking for an innovative genius, or an extremely succesful conqueror? Do you care at all about the succes of the leader beyond the battlefield? Would you object to the leader in casu also being a ghoulish mass murderer? And so on,...

That said, I'd say Napoleon might indeed warrant a mention on any shortlist, though he also made some very bad calls on crucial moments.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,174
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: March 26, 2012, 10:55:05 AM »

Depends on the criteria you're using. Are you looking for an innovative genius, or an extremely successful conqueror?
The greatest had to have both qualities IMO. But ultimately success must be the most important criteria.

Do you care at all about the success of the leader beyond the battlefield?
No, that is clearly irrelevant.

Would you object to the leader in casu also being a ghoulish mass murderer?
We are talking about his abilities as commander, not moral habitus.
Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: March 26, 2012, 01:32:59 PM »

Horatio Nelson- Admirals always get overshadowed by Generals in these discussions
Good point. But I think it is because their actions are generally less important. Naval battles can of course be crucial (and often has been), but most wars are after all decided by military campaigns on land.
Nelson is without doubt the greatest naval commander of all times.
Admirals actions less important? I know you are not trying to be offensive but I do take offense to that-
And you ever heard the phrase "he who rules the sea rules the world?" Think of the British Empire- think of how WWI started out of a shipbuilding competition between Britain and Germany- look at how the USA now controls the world's waters...

Genghis Khan diidn't need a navy since he conquered only land but since the 18th century I believe there is nothing more important then seapower.
Logged
Rooney
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 843
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: March 26, 2012, 02:01:26 PM »

What! No option for Charles XII? I shall report this anti-Swedish bigotry (Wink ). This is the Swede that nearly toppled the czarship of Peter the Great and would have, in my opinion, had he not been shot in the foot and forced to lead from a stretcher at Poltava.
Logged
WillK
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,276


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: March 26, 2012, 02:07:35 PM »

LOL at Lee making the list and getting a vote.
Logged
Rooney
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 843
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: March 26, 2012, 02:20:17 PM »

LOL at Lee making the list and getting a vote.
It is really a breath of fresh air to see someone else who does not buy into the Lee Myth. I applaud you, sir! Honestly, has no one ever heard about the Cheat Mountain Campaign of 1861 (well, except for Samuel R. Anderson).
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,174
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: March 26, 2012, 02:34:56 PM »

What! No option for Charles XII? I shall report this anti-Swedish bigotry (Wink ). This is the Swede that nearly toppled the czarship of Peter the Great and would have, in my opinion, had he not been shot in the foot and forced to lead from a stretcher at Poltava.
Well, this list is compiled by a Dane so you may be right ...;-) Gustav 2. Adolf and Karl 12. were great commanders.

I included Lee because this is an American forum, but I tend to agree with you. I thought about Patton too, but decided against it.

Wellington, Marlborough, Subutai and Prince Eugen are clearly also good contenders. 
Logged
World politics is up Schmitt creek
Nathan
Moderators
Atlas Superstar
*****
Posts: 34,248


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: March 26, 2012, 03:25:39 PM »

Subutai once won running cavalry battles in Poland and Hungary on successive days. Even though both countries were bigger then and shared a border around what is now Ruthenia, they still had the Carpathians along all of said border. Subutai wasn't physically present at both battles but he coordinated both, in an era of difficult communications.
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: March 26, 2012, 03:29:18 PM »

Horatio Nelson- Admirals always get overshadowed by Generals in these discussions
Good point. But I think it is because their actions are generally less important. Naval battles can of course be crucial (and often has been), but most wars are after all decided by military campaigns on land.
Nelson is without doubt the greatest naval commander of all times.
Admirals actions less important? I know you are not trying to be offensive but I do take offense to that-
And you ever heard the phrase "he who rules the sea rules the world?" Think of the British Empire- think of how WWI started out of a shipbuilding competition between Britain and Germany- look at how the USA now controls the world's waters...

Genghis Khan diidn't need a navy since he conquered only land but since the 18th century I believe there is nothing more important then seapower.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Influence_of_Sea_Power_upon_History
Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: March 26, 2012, 03:38:45 PM »

Patrick1- I am very familiar with Mahan and that is very relevant...he also inspired the Great White Fleet
Logged
Yelnoc
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,148
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: March 26, 2012, 03:47:26 PM »

Of the list - Napoleon.

Overall - Subutai
Logged
patrick1
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 7,865


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: March 26, 2012, 04:26:29 PM »

Patrick1- I am very familiar with Mahan and that is very relevant...he also inspired the Great White Fleet

I agree with you that sea power is being very underrated.  I quite like the quote below.

"When word of a crisis breaks out in Washington, it's no accident that the first question that comes to everyone's lips is: 'Where's the nearest carrier?'"

President Bill Clinton
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,174
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: March 26, 2012, 04:51:01 PM »

Patrick1- I am very familiar with Mahan and that is very relevant...he also inspired the Great White Fleet

I agree with you that sea power is being very underrated.  I quite like the quote below.

"When word of a crisis breaks out in Washington, it's no accident that the first question that comes to everyone's lips is: 'Where's the nearest carrier?'"

President Bill Clinton


The US is in many ways an island nation because of the isolation of America from the rest of the world so of course naval power - especially air carriers - are important to you. But if we look at military leadership throughout history most of the important campaigns have been fought on land.
My own country is an island nation and almost all of our war heroes where admirals, so I am not biased against naval commanders, but if you look at the top commanders that changed history, you will find more generals.

But lets have two separate threads - one army, one navy.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: March 26, 2012, 04:58:59 PM »

Patrick1- I am very familiar with Mahan and that is very relevant...he also inspired the Great White Fleet

I agree with you that sea power is being very underrated.  I quite like the quote below.

"When word of a crisis breaks out in Washington, it's no accident that the first question that comes to everyone's lips is: 'Where's the nearest carrier?'"

President Bill Clinton


The US is in many ways an island nation because of the isolation of America from the rest of the world so of course naval power - especially air carriers - are important to you. But if we look at military leadership throughout history most of the important campaigns have been fought on land.

Pretty much the same could be said about the British Empire. Due to being an island nation they needed a strong navy to defend themselves (British ground forces were almost always quite weak when compared to other powers), as well as to become a global power.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.

As of my country, the situation was totally opposite. We never relied on the navy and when Poland was a great power, we were land-based power. At some point, Polish-Lithuanian Navy was consiting just a few corsair ships at Baltic Sea. Well, our geographic location speaks for itself.
Logged
True Federalist (진정한 연방 주의자)
Ernest
Moderators
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 42,157
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: March 27, 2012, 05:21:42 PM »

I included Lee because this is an American forum, but I tend to agree with you. I thought about Patton too, but decided against it.

What about Washington?  While he had his weaknesses at the tactical level, he was superb at the strategic level.

Lee was the reverse.  A superb tactician especially when on the defensive, but weak on strategy.

Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,080
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: March 28, 2012, 11:33:46 AM »

Lee was good, maybe great (probably not).  He had the huge of advantage of having bad generals facing him.  Don't get me wrong, I like Lee, he was likely the best (overall) general in the US Civil War, but he gets a lot more praise than he deserves.

Some of the guys on this list were decent generals that history placed at the right time and place, and because they were not in over their head, managed to do what they were supposed to do.  Others went way above and beyond what history laid in their lap.  Genghis is one of those.
Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: March 28, 2012, 11:40:30 AM »

dead0man- I agree with your analysis of Lee...McClellan and Burnside gave him glory thru their failures
Logged
dead0man
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 46,080
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: March 28, 2012, 11:50:46 AM »

Aye.  And I should be clear, McClellan wasn't a HORRIBLE general.  He was great at getting ready for battle.  It was when it came time to fight that he was a complete disaster.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.05 seconds with 14 queries.