Police: Zimmerman says Trayvon decked him with one blow then began hammering him

[CaDan]

http://articles.orlandosentinel.com/2012-03-26/news/os-trayvon-martin-zimmerman-account-20120326_1_arizona-iced-tea-suv-unarmed-black-teenager

[Insula Dei]

Wait, wasn't Cadan banned?

[Senator X]

Wait, wasn't Cadan banned?

[BigSkyBob]

Don't the facts matter in this case?

There seems to be a rush to judgment against Zimmerman. Some have suggested that he must be guilty because he had a gun in his pocket and "Trayvon" [we don't call him "George"] was not carrying a weapon. This assumes "Trayvon" knew "George" had a gun in his pocket when, as alleged by the police, and confirmed by the fact of "George's" broken nose, struck "George" and began beating him. If "Trayvon" didn't knew of the gun, he just might have made a fatal mistake.

Some have suggested that this incident was a "stand your ground" law run amok. The facts seem to indicate that "Trayvon" was the one whom stood his ground rather than meekly retreating when confronted by a person on a neighborhood watch.

The Black Panther Party is offering, in their words, a $10,000 dollar bounty for "George." Allegedly, this is for the "capture" of "George," but, since there are no warrants from his arrest it is for the kidnapping of "George." This assumes the "bounty" is not for the murder of "George." In either case, why isn't the Black Panther Party being investigated as a potential "hate crime" by the feds for advocating the kidnapping/murder of a man whom is not Black?

[oakvale]

Wait, wasn't Cadan banned?

[Invisible Obama]

This person needs to be banned immediately, he is out of control.

[So the Heroes Fall]

Wait, wasn't Cadan banned?

[Torie]

This person needs to be banned immediately, he is out of control.

For what? Daring to express a different view?

There was a rumor that you had been banned. If so, socks are frowned upon. If not, well fine, carry on, but your signature offends me I must say.

[BigSkyBob]

This person needs to be banned immediately, he is out of control.

Why is posting an article attempting to expand upon the facts in this case a reason for banning anyone?

 

[BigSkyBob]

This person needs to be banned immediately, he is out of control.

For what? Daring to express a different view?

There was a rumor that you had been banned. If so, socks are frowned upon. If not, well fine, carry on, but your signature offends me I must say.

How would a "sock" have the same name, and, magically have the same number of total posts?

[Torie]

This person needs to be banned immediately, he is out of control.

For what? Daring to express a different view?

There was a rumor that you had been banned. If so, socks are frowned upon. If not, well fine, carry on, but your signature offends me I must say.

How would a "sock" have the same name, and, magically have the same number of total posts?

Don't have a clue. That is beyond my skill set. We will find out one way or the other in due course, so there is no point arguing about it. And I really don't know CaDan (be it this one or the former one, or the same one). He did his thing separate and apart from where I do my thing.

[Invisible Obama]

Why is posting an article attempting to expand upon the facts in this case a reason for banning anyone?
 

He's trolled the boards for awhile now. He already had one thread about this subject locked. Others posters can confirm that.

[Gravis Marketing]

[BigSkyBob]

This person needs to be banned immediately, he is out of control.

For what? Daring to express a different view?

There was a rumor that you had been banned. If so, socks are frowned upon. If not, well fine, carry on, but your signature offends me I must say.

How would a "sock" have the same name, and, magically have the same number of total posts?

Don't have a clue. That is beyond my skill set. We will find out one way or the other in due course, so there is no point arguing about it. And I really don't know CaDan (be it this one or the former one, or the same one). He did his thing separate and apart from where I do my thing.

Well, if you are going to speculate as whether, or not, "CaDan" had been "banned" then it would have behooved you to look at the evidence. "CaDan" was posting, and "CaDan" had about the exact number of posts as the previous CaDan.

Whomever started those rumors committed an injustice against the poster, and, you ought to apologize for spreading those rumors.

[asexual trans victimologist]

Did it ever occur to anyone that jumping on a user with repeated references to "troll" other similar attacks might cause such a person to dig their heels in and post in a more abrasive manner than they otherwise would?

If such person felt like being a deliberately abrasive and completely unlikeable jackass, then yes, possibly.

[Torie]

This person needs to be banned immediately, he is out of control.

For what? Daring to express a different view?

There was a rumor that you had been banned. If so, socks are frowned upon. If not, well fine, carry on, but your signature offends me I must say.

How would a "sock" have the same name, and, magically have the same number of total posts?

Don't have a clue. That is beyond my skill set. We will find out one way or the other in due course, so there is no point arguing about it. And I really don't know CaDan (be it this one or the former one, or the same one). He did his thing separate and apart from where I do my thing.

Well, if you are going to speculate as whether, or not, "CaDan" had been "banned" then it would have behooved you to look at the evidence. "CaDan" was posting, and "CaDan" had about the exact number of posts as the previous CaDan.

Whomever started those rumors committed an injustice against the poster, and, you ought to apologize for spreading those rumors.

My source is a highly reliable one. No, I won't apologize for spreading the rumor, because I made clear that I was not sure, and that is that. Obviously the "rumor" had wide circulation, and I was not the one who originally brought it up. So it is not as if I let some cat out of the bag. But to be honest with you, for the first time I reported this thread, inquiring as to the poster's status. And then others mentioned it publically here.

But you have a point. If it turns out he was not banned, I think I will apologize to him. Good idea. Thank you.

[Sibboleth]

He shows up as banned on the PoMo board. What's going on?

[Bacon King]

For the record, this forum does have a ToS:

You agree, through your use of this forum, that you will not post any material which is false, defamatory, inaccurate, abusive, vulgar, hateful, harassing, obscene, profane, sexually oriented, threatening, invasive of a person's privacy, adult material, or otherwise in violation of any International or United States Federal law. You also agree not to post any copyrighted material unless you own the copyright or you have written consent from the owner of the copyrighted material. Spam, flooding, advertisements, chain letters, pyramid schemes, and solicitations are also forbidden on this forum.

Note that it is impossible for the staff or the owners of this forum to confirm the validity of posts. Please remember that we do not actively monitor the posted messages, and as such, are not responsible for the content contained within. We do not warrant the accuracy, completeness, or usefulness of any information presented. The posted messages express the views of the author, and not necessarily the views of this forum, its staff, its subsidiaries, or this forum's owner. Anyone who feels that a posted message is objectionable is encouraged to notify an administrator or moderator of this forum immediately. The staff and the owner of this forum reserve the right to remove objectionable content, within a reasonable time frame, if they determine that removal is necessary. This is a manual process, however, please realize that they may not be able to remove or edit particular messages immediately. This policy applies to member profile information as well.

You remain solely responsible for the content of your posted messages. Furthermore, you agree to indemnify and hold harmless the owners of this forum, any related websites to this forum, its staff, and its subsidiaries. The owners of this forum also reserve the right to reveal your identity (or any other related information collected on this service) in the event of a formal complaint or legal action arising from any situation caused by your use of this forum.

You have the ability, as you register, to choose your username. We advise that you keep the name appropriate. With this user account you are about to register, you agree to never give your password out to another person except an administrator, for your protection and for validity reasons. You also agree to NEVER use another person's account for any reason.  We also HIGHLY recommend you use a complex and unique password for your account, to prevent account theft.

After you register and login to this forum, you will be able to fill out a detailed profile. It is your responsibility to present clean and accurate information. Any information the forum owner or staff determines to be inaccurate or vulgar in nature will be removed, with or without prior notice. Appropriate sanctions may be applicable.

Please note that with each post, your IP address is recorded, in the event that you need to be banned from this forum or your ISP contacted. This will only happen in the event of a major violation of this agreement.

Also note that the software places a cookie, a text file containing bits of information (such as your username and password), in your browser's cache. This is ONLY used to keep you logged in/out. The software does not collect or send any other form of information to your computer.

[Senator Clarence]

Once again- I don't know this fella's history. If you say he has been offensive and racist I buy it even though the word racist has been overused here... but what is wrong with him presenting reports on this case?

This country has no trial by media. From everything I have read or heard- Zimmerman deserves to be arrested. I believe that fully...but what is wrong with CaDan presenting a different point of view? If he used the n-word or was otherwise offensive I'd grab my pitchfork and join the mob...but I haven't seen him that way yet- I am new here but I haven't noticed it.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

He shows up as banned on the PoMo board. What's going on?

a putsch

[asexual trans victimologist]

Really, Dan? Have any of us called Klecly or Ben or TJ of any of our other respected very conservative posters trolls?

It's not because you're a poor oh-so-persecuted conservative. It's because you're incapable of posting anything without making it simultaneously aggressively moronic and somehow about yourself.

[bgwah]

How is this even controversial? I really don't understand conservatives sometimes.

Most of us aren't saying Zimmerman should be shot on the spot or found guilty without a trial. But the fact that he hasn't even been arrested is just ridiculous... What a stupid law.

[Governor Scott]

How the-?  Did CaDan hack this board or something?

[The Mikado]

According to Nym, he was accidentially unbanned.  The mistake has been rectified.

[Diabolical Minds Think Alike]

Wait, wasn't Cadan banned?