SENATE BILL: The New Atlasian Healthcare Act (Law'd) (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 28, 2024, 06:37:25 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  SENATE BILL: The New Atlasian Healthcare Act (Law'd) (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: SENATE BILL: The New Atlasian Healthcare Act (Law'd)  (Read 19689 times)
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« on: April 09, 2012, 09:33:47 AM »

I'd just like to add this disclaimer: I don't really understand this.

However, I'm just putting my 2 cents in on Senator Sbane's proposal. Here's an idea for percentage brackets:

At or below poverty level: 0%
150% of poverty level: 5%
200%: 10%
300: 15%
400%: 20%
500%: 30%
1000%: 50%
2000%: 75%
5000%: 90%

Now, this is just a vague idea; I don't know if this is realistic or helpful in any way, I'm just putting this forward as a hypothetical.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2012, 11:07:48 AM »

How? In what way is it wrong to give everyone the health care they need and not make them worry if they'll get dropped? Is it because Big Government is taking over your life, because that's just bulls**t.

The government isn't going to go from health care to banning Muslims any time soon, or ever for that matter.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 09, 2012, 11:23:42 AM »

Private insurance is still available, so if the government does a better job, then in your worldview it should deserve to drive private insurers out of business.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 09, 2012, 09:27:52 PM »

OK, I understand it now. So we're going to make people pay for some of it based on income, instead of having it be free?

Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2012, 10:13:14 AM »

Well, I think the rich should do most if not all of the heavy lifting, payment-wise.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2012, 04:35:21 PM »

Alright.

I'd like to voice my support for this bill.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2012, 07:19:04 PM »

Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2012, 05:28:25 AM »


There is no Whig War on Women. The war I see in Atalsia is the the Left's war against the Family and Faith.
SCOTUS settled contraception decades ago. You're behind the times.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2012, 01:51:32 PM »

Chiropractic services
Really guys? There is no consensus whether that is pseudo(alternative) health care or not. Whig war on women goes without mention.

How did chiropractic services get dragged into this? And what does that have to do with women?
I'm not sure about the chiropractics thing, but the WWW is about you guys denying the women of Atlasia the right to make decisions about their own bodies.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« Reply #9 on: April 17, 2012, 05:26:03 PM »

Gah! Ninja'd! Well, here's what I was going to say:
[quote author=Senator Alfred F. Jones link=topic=151527.msg3266413#msg3266413 Under the current health care law, contraceptive services are not explicitly listed as being provided. Senator Pingvin and Assemblyman JCL are not the ones who are trying to change something about our current statute.
I don't believe that it matters what the current law is, the Whig Party (or at least some of its more prominent members) is opposing coverage of contraceptive services. There's really no other way to cut it in my book.

Yes, you can't take off what you never put on, but opposing the putting on and supporting the taking off are fundamentally the same.
Logged
H.E. VOLODYMYR ZELENKSYY
Alfred F. Jones
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,121
United States


« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2012, 05:26:50 AM »

Abstain.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.027 seconds with 12 queries.