Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
May 19, 2013, 11:51:45 pm
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
Questions and Answers
The Atlas
So it turns out...
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
Author
Topic: So it turns out... (Read 442 times)
CathKhan
Cathcon
YaBB God
Posts: 11021
So it turns out...
«
on:
April 01, 2012, 11:06:06 pm »
...that if you mess with the map code, you can actually make maps dating back to 1824. And I'll have to check up on this, but assuming that the same amount of states were in existence between 1820 and 1824, you could make an 1820 map too without it looking awkward (empty states, like when you create an 1800 map using the map code and just leave states gray or white). What's with this?
Logged
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 09, 2013, 05:55:25 pm
You are God.
Quote from: OAM on May 15, 2013, 09:18:21 pm
God (R-MI).
1996:
Listen dawg, we got some crazy @$$ sh#t goin' on over here, nawhadahmean? C'mon over!
Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel
Inks.LWC
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 31481
Re: So it turns out...
«
Reply #1 on:
April 01, 2012, 11:12:51 pm »
I'm confused as to what you're asking. Yes... we have map making capabilities that go back to the 1800s. Is that what you're asking?
Logged
CathKhan
Cathcon
YaBB God
Posts: 11021
Re: So it turns out...
«
Reply #2 on:
April 01, 2012, 11:20:35 pm »
On the EV calc, you can only go back to 1840. Fiddling with the map code, specifically the tear specification, you can actually go back to 1824. I guess what I'm asking is why we can't do that on the EV calc. I was more just pointing that out, but yeah, I guess that's what I'm asking.
Logged
Quote from: Comrade Shmoo on May 09, 2013, 05:55:25 pm
You are God.
Quote from: OAM on May 15, 2013, 09:18:21 pm
God (R-MI).
1996:
Listen dawg, we got some crazy @$$ sh#t goin' on over here, nawhadahmean? C'mon over!
Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel
Inks.LWC
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 31481
Re: So it turns out...
«
Reply #3 on:
April 01, 2012, 11:42:52 pm »
Quote from: Cathcon on April 01, 2012, 11:20:35 pm
On the EV calc, you can only go back to 1840. Fiddling with the map code, specifically the tear specification, you can actually go back to 1824. I guess what I'm asking is why we can't do that on the EV calc. I was more just pointing that out, but yeah, I guess that's what I'm asking.
I'm guessing Dave was working on updating the maps to get them fully functional and never updated the EV calc options. I'd suggest e-mailing him if you want him to update it.
Logged
Californian Tony
Antonio V
YaBB God
Posts: 24636
Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87
Re: So it turns out...
«
Reply #4 on:
April 02, 2012, 03:32:41 am »
Interesting...
Logged
Truer today than it was yesterday.
"A good portion of this country has created an alternate universe. I call this place were these folks live Bullsh*t Mountain. The denizens of Bullsh*t Mountain believe many things: they believe that a Kenyan Muslim President has fundamentally changed the relationship between government and the people of this country."
Jon Stewart
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 21479
Re: So it turns out...
«
Reply #5 on:
April 04, 2012, 05:58:43 pm »
There are several reasons why Dave is unlikely to go earlier than 1824.
1) In the earlier elections, you have a far wider variety of methods of selecting electors than statewide winner-take-all. Indeed, technically, 1824, 1828, and 1832 do not at present allow for the full range of options. Maryland was single-member districts with no statewide electors thru 1832 (Tennessee used the same method thru 1828 and three more states used it in 1824), Maine used the 1 per CD plus 2 statewide through 1828, and in 1828 New York used a funky method where the voters elected 1 elector per CD and then those electors picked 2 more.
2) The popular vote was not used as much in selecting electors in those earlier elections.
3) For 1820, Dave would need to change the shapes of both Missouri and Massachusetts.
Logged
“Always it is easier to pay homage to prophets than to heed the direction of their vision.”
Clinton Lee Scott
Read
Fat Man on a Diet
, an alternate history in which the history of atomic weapons does not go as it did in our timeline.
Pages:
[
1
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...