NE2: Northeast Region Distracted Drivers Act [Failed] (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 11:08:39 PM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Elections
  Atlas Fantasy Government
  Regional Governments (Moderators: Southern Senator North Carolina Yankee, Lumine)
  NE2: Northeast Region Distracted Drivers Act [Failed] (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Author Topic: NE2: Northeast Region Distracted Drivers Act [Failed]  (Read 2618 times)
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« on: April 07, 2012, 07:15:11 AM »
« edited: April 12, 2012, 07:12:00 PM by Cincinnatus »

The Assembly will now consider the following legislation introduced by the Representative from RI.  Debate will last 72 hours.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #1 on: April 09, 2012, 10:21:19 PM »

This legislation has the greatest intention, but I see it as over-reaching, and unenforceable.  We're going to fine people for smoking, eating, and drinking?  What evidence do you have that these activities result in enough incidences to warrant punishment, or removing such freedoms?

I understand the whole "texting" dilemma with young teens, and you'd be better off introducing a bill that covers this area, and leaves out other "distractions".  In all honesty, I don't even see this bill achieving its intended purpose, but I'd be willing to listen to any such data in support of proposals similar to this.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2012, 05:39:33 PM »

This legislation has the greatest intention, but I see it as over-reaching, and unenforceable.  We're going to fine people for smoking, eating, and drinking?  What evidence do you have that these activities result in enough incidences to warrant punishment, or removing such freedoms?

I understand the whole "texting" dilemma with young teens, and you'd be better off introducing a bill that covers this area, and leaves out other "distractions".  In all honesty, I don't even see this bill achieving its intended purpose, but I'd be willing to listen to any such data in support of proposals similar to this.

Well, present an amendment if you feel that strongly about it.

Present me some data saying this will be a successful en-devour if you feel that strongly about it..  You've diagnosed the problem, but you haven't supported your resolution.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2012, 07:06:36 PM »

Debate time has expired.  The Assembly will now vote on the final text.  This vote will last 24 hours, or until all members have voted.

Quote
You must be logged in to read this quote.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2012, 07:09:57 PM »

Nay, FTR.
Logged
Cincinnatus
JBach717
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,092
United States


« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2012, 07:11:03 PM »

Voting time has expired.  With 1 Yea, and 2 Nays, the bill fails.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.028 seconds with 13 queries.