Realignment? (user search)
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 27, 2024, 07:38:39 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  Realignment? (search mode)
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What is the most likely theory?
#1
Economics taking centre stage
 
#2
Country moving to the left
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 40

Author Topic: Realignment?  (Read 7017 times)
old timey villain
cope1989
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,741


« on: June 24, 2012, 11:13:07 AM »

Agreed, we're still living in the Clinton realignment as an umbrella system. I mean the Clinton years definitely established red states and blue states. But the swing states have changed pretty tremendously

1992/1996: Tennessee, Kentucky, Louisiana, Arizona

2000/2004: Iowa, New Mexico

2008: North Carolina, Virginia, Indiana

And then of course there are the perennial swing states that have always been competitive. But the ones I listed above seemed to only be competitive in those certain cycles. You could argue that NM and IA are still swing states, but it looks like NM is losing its toss up status and is becoming lean Dem. And since 1988, IA has only gone R once, in 2004, and it was by a very slim margin.

So while the same party system has more or less remained in place since 92, the swing states have changed, probably not always based on political changes but moreso the regional strengths of the candidates.

Logged
Pages: [1]  
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.016 seconds with 14 queries.