Romney ad: "We fired Santorum. Why promote him?"

[Keystone Phil]

He isn't letting his Super PAC do his dirty work on this one. Interesting line of attack in saying that "we" fired Santorum when Republicans overwhelmingly backed him and Romney himself donated to Rick in 2006. That's why it's especially strange that Romney himself is doing this ad. Did Mitt support Casey?

http://www.politico.com/blogs/burns-haberman/2012/04/mitts-pennsylvania-attack-we-fired-him-as-senator-119974.html

[Keystone Phil]

...and now the word is that the ad is being pulled out of respect for Santorum staying home with Bella.

[A dog on every car, a car in every elevator]

...sheds some light on Romney's decision not to seek re-election himself in 2006.

[Keystone Phil]

...sheds some light on Romney's decision not to seek re-election himself in 2006.

Sheds light? Please. Everyone and their mother knows why he didn't run. He was going to get walloped but tries to feed us this nonsense that running for re-election would have only served him personally (yet admits that as President, he'd "obviously" run for re-election. What. A. Joke.).

[I left.]

So Phil, are you going to support Romney in the General?

[Keystone Phil]

So Phil, are you going to support Romney in the General?

I have consistently said that I will not comment on my vote if Romney is the nominee. I don't know how I'll be voting as of now anyway.

[memphis]

On that same night, how did Romney's bid for re-election in MA go?

[Proud Lieberal from Northeast]

At least Santorum had a courage to ran for reelection under very unfavorable circumstances.

Romney basically handed MA State House to the Democrats without a fight.

[ShadowOfTheWave]

Pennsylvania firing someone is not the same as Massachusetts firing someone. Massachusetts is a socialist/liberal social engineer state. So Romney not be able to win re-election is kind of a plus for him, it shows he governed as a conservative.

[Keystone Phil]

Pennsylvania firing someone is not the same as Massachusetts firing someone. Massachusetts is a socialist/liberal social engineer state. So Romney not be able to win re-election is kind of a plus for him, it shows he governed as a conservative.

But Mitt claims he was so accomplished. Why not run even if it meant a loss? He apparently had such a great record...

[Joe Republic]

Pennsylvania firing someone is not the same as Massachusetts firing someone. Massachusetts is a socialist/liberal social engineer state. So Romney not be able to win re-election is kind of a plus for him, it shows he governed as a conservative.

4/10

[BigSkyBob]

So Phil, are you going to support Romney in the General?

Heaven forbid, if Romney should win the nomination, discussions of supporting Romney in the general would just be a distraction. It is clear that the Republican establishment is in a state of war against the rank-and-file members. What happened in North Dakota is a clear example. The rank-and-file need to organize and fight back.

The reality is that the fix is on for Romney in 2012 because in part rank-and-file members rallied to McCain in 2008 rather than demanding reform. As a result, the "reform" in the process we received resulted in the rules being changed in conservative states to make their delegate allocation more proportional, while liberal states remained closer to winner-take-all. As a result, reforms that were suppose to make delegates won more accurately reflect the popular vote actually disproportionately favored the establishment candidate more than even winner-take-all would have! If the rank-and-file fall in line for the establishment candidate in 2012 the rules going into 2016, again, will be heavily stacked to favored to establishment candidate.

[BigSkyBob]

Pennsylvania firing someone is not the same as Massachusetts firing someone. Massachusetts is a socialist/liberal social engineer state. So Romney not be able to win reelection is kind of a plus for him, it shows he governed as a conservative.

Why don't you just claim Christians are such a small percentage in Massachusetts that his defeat for reelection clearly indicated that Mitt Romney can walk on water?  Any Romney claims to divinity are about as credible as his claims of being "severely conservative."

[wormyguy]

Pennsylvania firing someone is not the same as Massachusetts firing someone. Massachusetts is a socialist/liberal social engineer state. So Romney not be able to win re-election is kind of a plus for him, it shows he governed as a conservative.

Mass arguably is to the economic right of Penna at the state level (though certainly not at the federal or municipal level).

[GM Griffin]

"I like being able to fire people that provide representation to me."

[I Can't Get That Sound You Make, Out Of My Head]

No, Pennsylvania fired Santorum. Try again jackass.

[Inks.LWC Supports Chuck Hagel]

That's one of the worst ads I've ever seen.

[Big DaddyTX]

God, that ad was horrible! That is just another reason why if Romney wins the nomination, I will not vote for him for President.

[asexual trans victimologist]

Pennsylvania firing someone is not the same as Massachusetts firing someone. Massachusetts is a socialist/liberal social engineer state. So Romney not be able to win re-election is kind of a plus for him, it shows he governed as a conservative.

Mass arguably is to the economic right of Penna at the state level (though certainly not at the federal or municipal level).

Yeah, I've frequently noticed that a lot of our state legislators including much of the leadership come across more like particularly wishy-washy moderate Republicans than anything else.

[Rowan]

Just saw this ad on television about an hour ago. If it was supposedly "pulled" out of respect for Santorum, 6ABC didn't get the memo.

[TheDeadFlagBlues]

This is one of the most tone deaf ads I've ever witnessed. It's like running an ad against Joe Lieberman or Lisa Murkowski for losing their respective primaries in the GE.

[Keystone Phil]

I'd really love to hear Rick ask Romney if he supported Casey in 2006.

[State Comptroller Atkins]

Pennsylvania firing someone is not the same as Massachusetts firing someone. Massachusetts is a socialist/liberal social engineer state. So Romney not be able to win re-election is kind of a plus for him, it shows he governed as a conservative.

You know, this post will look quite foolish if Brown wins in November.

[PASOK Leader Hashemite]

Pennsylvania firing someone is not the same as Massachusetts firing someone. Massachusetts is a socialist/liberal social engineer state. So Romney not be able to win re-election is kind of a plus for him, it shows he governed as a conservative.

4/10

You're being generous with him. I'd peg that post at a pretty poor 1-2/10.