Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
August 30, 2016, 02:34:31 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections
| | |-+  Romney most damaged nominee since at least 1996
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: Romney most damaged nominee since at least 1996  (Read 2097 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40149
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09


View Profile
« on: April 12, 2012, 12:57:37 am »
Ignore



http://www.buzzfeed.com/zekejmiller/bruising-primary-has-put-romney-in-historically-w
Logged
L'exquisite Douleur
BRTD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 77533
France


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2012, 01:05:08 am »
Ignore

And the difference too. WOW.
Logged

Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27973


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 12, 2012, 01:49:30 am »
Ignore

To be fair, it seems to me like politicians in general have lower favourables now than historically. But that still doesn't excuse Romney of course.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
○∙◄☻tπ[╪AV┼cV└
jfern
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 38665


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 12, 2012, 03:01:26 am »
Ignore

To be fair, it seems to me like politicians in general have lower favourables now than historically. But that still doesn't excuse Romney of course.

Naw, it's just Romney.

Has anyone polled Bush lately? I found a CNN poll from September where he was 42-53, which is comparable to Romney's numbers.
Logged

Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 40149
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 12, 2012, 03:32:37 am »
Ignore

To be fair, it seems to me like politicians in general have lower favourables now than historically. But that still doesn't excuse Romney of course.

Naw, it's just Romney.

Has anyone polled Bush lately? I found a CNN poll from September where he was 42-53, which is comparable to Romney's numbers.

Here is how Bush does today:

BTW: George W. Bush has a 45-50 favorable rating these days, according to the poll - among all voters.
Logged
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10976
United States


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 12, 2012, 06:53:21 am »
Ignore

Also, Hillary Clinton's favorables are about 20 points higher than they were four years ago.
Logged
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13771


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 12, 2012, 07:22:39 am »
Ignore

I can't believe Gore and Kerry were widely considered unlikable candidates and yet they look like Glinda the Good Witch next to Mitt. Romney feels so much like a Dem nominee for President, between his awkwardness, his insincere pivoting on issues, and the media's obvious disdain for him.
Logged
ZuWo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4645
Switzerland


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 12, 2012, 07:25:01 am »
Ignore

To be fair, it seems to me like politicians in general have lower favourables now than historically. But that still doesn't excuse Romney of course.

Naw, it's just Romney.

Has anyone polled Bush lately? I found a CNN poll from September where he was 42-53, which is comparable to Romney's numbers.

Here is how Bush does today:

BTW: George W. Bush has a 45-50 favorable rating these days, according to the poll - among all voters.

It appears Romney is such a weak nominee that the Republicans would be better off with George W. Bush as their candidate.
Logged
Keystone Phil
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 52851


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 12, 2012, 07:37:36 am »
Ignore

Yep
Logged



The entire country is pretty much Republican.
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9018
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 12, 2012, 08:01:53 am »
Ignore

Worst GOP nominee since Goldwater. Think about it.

Nixon, Ford, Reagan, Bush, McCain, Bush II - None of them were in the same position of being seen as unelectable as Mitt Romney is.
Logged

Gustaf
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27973


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 12, 2012, 08:22:33 am »
Ignore

To be fair, it seems to me like politicians in general have lower favourables now than historically. But that still doesn't excuse Romney of course.

Naw, it's just Romney.

Has anyone polled Bush lately? I found a CNN poll from September where he was 42-53, which is comparable to Romney's numbers.

Here is how Bush does today:

BTW: George W. Bush has a 45-50 favorable rating these days, according to the poll - among all voters.

For the record I didn't really mean individual politicians over time - I admit my wording was a bit unclear.

I may be wrong but it is my impression that public level of trust in politicians has gone down in general over the last few decades. That's certainly true here, at least.
Logged

This place really has become a cesspool of degenerate whores...

Economic score: +0.9
Social score: -2.61

In MN for fantasy stuff, member of the most recently dissolved centrist party.
Brittain33
brittain33
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13771


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 12, 2012, 08:24:32 am »
Ignore

To be fair, it seems to me like politicians in general have lower favourables now than historically. But that still doesn't excuse Romney of course.

Naw, it's just Romney.

Has anyone polled Bush lately? I found a CNN poll from September where he was 42-53, which is comparable to Romney's numbers.

Here is how Bush does today:

BTW: George W. Bush has a 45-50 favorable rating these days, according to the poll - among all voters.

For the record I didn't really mean individual politicians over time - I admit my wording was a bit unclear.

I may be wrong but it is my impression that public level of trust in politicians has gone down in general over the last few decades. That's certainly true here, at least.

It certainly has, but look at how successful Obama was in 2008 in seeming to transcend that. It's as if the negative feelings leave an opening for national politicians to appear to be above it all.
Logged
الجنرال كيم ايل سونغ
Kalwejt
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 43558


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 12, 2012, 08:36:57 am »
Ignore

Maybe it's a time to draft George W. Bush for President?

Screw the constitution. He's still more electable than Mitt Romney.
Logged

You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9018
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 12, 2012, 09:00:17 am »
Ignore

Maybe it's a time to draft George W. Bush for President?

Screw the constitution. He's still more electable than Mitt Romney.

The funny thing is that he actually is... You couldn't drink a beer with Mitt Romney. I mean, you literally couldn't.
Logged

morgieb
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6657
Australia


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 12, 2012, 09:12:48 am »
Ignore

I say he's the most damaged since 1972.
Logged

Erc
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5572
Slovenia



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: April 12, 2012, 09:14:06 am »
Ignore

"America Regrets Giving Bush Surprise Third Term"
Logged

Proud Mugwump.
Phony Moderate
Obamaisdabest
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 10976
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 12, 2012, 09:29:01 am »
Ignore

This election may also have some similarity to UK 1992. Obama (Major), a personally well-liked leader going up against the unpopular opposition leader Romney (Kinnock) during pretty poor economic circumstances.
Logged
IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4110
United States


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 12, 2012, 12:44:37 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Worst GOP nominee since Goldwater. Think about it

This is something the Santorum campaign has been saying since day one.

Goldwater style landslide coming right up.
Logged

"I never would have thought that there would be a crisis involving overzealous militias/regional governments and secession attempts where the IDS would be the only peaceful and loyal state." -Dereich
You kip if you want to...
change08
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 9018
United Kingdom


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: April 12, 2012, 12:48:39 pm »
Ignore

Quote
Worst GOP nominee since Goldwater. Think about it

This is something the Santorum campaign has been saying since day one.

Goldwater style landslide coming right up.

I wouldn't say a landslide of those proportions is possible, but the candidate is as bad a pick. Santorum was the better candidate.
Logged

IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4110
United States


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 12, 2012, 12:52:16 pm »
Ignore

Quote
I wouldn't say a landslide of those proportions is possible, but the candidate is as bad a pick. Santorum was the better candidate.

If he's down by 12 in Colorado, then he's going to keep Idaho, Utah, and Wyoming.

Nebraska, Kansas, South Dakota and Montana are all tossup.
Logged

"I never would have thought that there would be a crisis involving overzealous militias/regional governments and secession attempts where the IDS would be the only peaceful and loyal state." -Dereich
tmthforu94
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19925
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #20 on: April 12, 2012, 12:55:24 pm »
Ignore

Nebraska, Kansas, South Dakota and Montana are all tossup.
LMAO

This made my day. lol
Logged


Boris
boris78
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7107
United Kingdom


Political Matrix
E: -1.55, S: -4.52

View Profile WWW
« Reply #21 on: April 12, 2012, 04:55:11 pm »
Ignore

Cover of Time Magazine 4/20/92:



too lazy to look up the specific numbers, but Clinton obviously had negative unfavorables in April and was probably trailing Perot and Bush as Nirvana was on their Nevermind tour and we were all glued to our TV sets watching TMNT (soon to be butchered by Michael Bay), doing M. Bison vs. Dhalsim battles, and so on. 
Logged

King
intermoderate
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29560
United States


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: April 12, 2012, 05:27:01 pm »
Ignore

too lazy to look up the specific numbers, but Clinton obviously had negative unfavorables in April and was probably trailing Perot and Bush

A quick google:

Quote
In April 1992, his favorable/unfavorable ratio was at 32/43 percent. Clinton had been hounded by allegations of sexual misconduct with Gennifer Flowers, as well as accusations he evaded the Vietnam War draft.

So Romney is doing one point worse than Clinton did with a fresh sex scandal.  Congrats to Mitt.

Really, I only see this number going down as Mitt gets to meet the general election voters more.  Unless I'm underestimating this man, I can't see Mitt being better than -20 on Election Day.  The dude is too sleezy.
« Last Edit: April 12, 2012, 05:30:29 pm by King »Logged

Insula Dei
belgiansocialist
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4353
Belgium


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 12, 2012, 05:28:29 pm »
Ignore

To be fair, it seems to me like politicians in general have lower favourables now than historically. But that still doesn't excuse Romney of course.

Naw, it's just Romney.

Has anyone polled Bush lately? I found a CNN poll from September where he was 42-53, which is comparable to Romney's numbers.

Here is how Bush does today:

BTW: George W. Bush has a 45-50 favorable rating these days, according to the poll - among all voters.

For the record I didn't really mean individual politicians over time - I admit my wording was a bit unclear.

I may be wrong but it is my impression that public level of trust in politicians has gone down in general over the last few decades. That's certainly true here, at least.

Romney is being compared mainly to presidential nominees from the last decade and a half or so in this thread, though, so his awful popularity rates within that context  can't be blamed on any sort of political conjuncture.
Logged
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 6465


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 12, 2012, 05:31:57 pm »
Ignore


Bob Dole had at least a chance. Mitt Romney doesn't. Tongue
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines