Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
December 20, 2014, 10:12:02 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Election Archive
| |-+  2012 Elections (Moderators: Mr. Morden, Bacon King, Sheriff Buford TX Justice)
| | |-+  AP's Swing State map (April 2012)
« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Print
Author Topic: AP's Swing State map (April 2012)  (Read 1795 times)
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35202
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« on: April 14, 2012, 10:45:41 am »
Ignore



http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/04/14/us/politics/ap-us-road-to-270-glance.html?_r=2&hp

What I would change:

NM, MN, WI, MI -> Safe Obama

PA -> Tossup

GA, SC -> Lean Romney (but we need more polls from there, preferably from Mason-Dixon, PPP and SurveyUSA)
Logged
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23786
Iceland


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.48

View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 14, 2012, 10:50:56 am »
Ignore

So:



If I had to predict the tossups, it'd look like this:

Logged


I'm a teenaged male. Everything is wrong with me.
opebo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 47606


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 14, 2012, 11:03:10 am »
Ignore

This is more realistic:



Though obviously its a stretch to call Pennsylvania a tossup, and Obama's consistently ahead in VA, OH, and NH as well.
Logged

The essence of democracy at its purest is a lynch mob

Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35202
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 14, 2012, 11:08:44 am »
Ignore

This is more realistic:



Though obviously its a stretch to call Pennsylvania a tossup, and Obama's consistently ahead in VA, OH, and NH as well.

AR is only lean ?
Logged
Bull Moose Base
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2698


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 14, 2012, 11:29:49 am »
Ignore

Junk junk junk! Only map worth looking at would be one based on polling, including only pollsters with good records, starting in 2 months or so...
Logged
Tender Branson
Mark Warner 08
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35202
Austria


Political Matrix
E: -7.10, S: -6.09

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 14, 2012, 11:39:17 am »
Ignore

Junk junk junk! Only map worth looking at would be one based on polling, including only pollsters with good records, starting in 2 months or so...

The next 4 months are pretty much useless when it comes to polling. I expect it to be similar to the Kerry vs. Bush summer. Polling will become interesting when Mason-Dixon starts polling a lot of states in August/September. Which is also the time when PPP switches to a likely voter model.
Logged
5280
MagneticFree
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2783
United States


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 14, 2012, 11:45:41 am »
Ignore

Junk junk junk! Only map worth looking at would be one based on polling, including only pollsters with good records, starting in 2 months or so...
Some of you guys overreact to a damn poll, chill out bro.
Logged

Paul/Cruz 2016!
HagridOfTheDeep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5269
Canada


Political Matrix
E: 2.32, S: 0.52

View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 14, 2012, 11:58:59 am »
Ignore

I think Michigan and Pennsylvania could be in play.

New Mexico is a lost cause though.
Logged

ShadowOfTheWave
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1622
United States


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 14, 2012, 12:14:07 pm »
Ignore

If the GOP spend any significant amount of cash in PA this year they deserve to lose. We're not going to win. Take those funds and use in more vulnerable territory. If Bush hadn't spend so much cash in PA in 2004, he could have carried NH & WI.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5269
Canada


Political Matrix
E: 2.32, S: 0.52

View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 14, 2012, 12:19:55 pm »
Ignore

Except PA has been swingier than Ohio this year. It sometimes seems like a better bet than Virginia, which is a state Romney will surely pour money into. So why not try for Pennsylvania too? If he wins it, the benefits would be astronomical.
Logged

ShadowOfTheWave
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1622
United States


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 14, 2012, 12:34:13 pm »
Ignore

Except PA has been swingier than Ohio this year. It sometimes seems like a better bet than Virginia, which is a state Romney will surely pour money into. So why not try for Pennsylvania too? If he wins it, the benefits would be astronomical.

If he wins it, it will be by a razor thin margin, and he could still lose the presidency in that scenario. The state is expensive, and a long shot. I would just rather the $$$ be spent elsewhere.
Logged
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 34870


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: April 14, 2012, 12:59:18 pm »
Ignore

LOL at people who still think NM is a toss-up.
Logged

Antonio V
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 31354
France


Political Matrix
E: -6.45, S: -4.87

P P P

View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 14, 2012, 01:10:04 pm »
Ignore

LOL at people who still think NM is a toss-up.

Yeah, definitely. Romney should probably give up on Nevada already.
Logged

HashCAN     americans saw the EP elections and people cringing at Europeans being morons and electing Nazis; so they massively said "NO" and decided to prove that they're still bigger morons



"A reformist is someone who realizes that, when you bang your head on a wall, it's the head that breaks rather than the wall."

Peppino, from the movie Baaria
IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2673
United States


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 14, 2012, 01:11:01 pm »
Ignore

CO, OH, NM, PA, and IA are all Safe Obama.

NC, VA, GA, SC, FL, NH are all tossup.
Logged

"By not voting, you would let someone win who wants to destroy the regions, raise taxes, remove guns from the street, nationalize transit, expand abortion coverage, a gut the military." - Hagrid
RG Fritz
JLD
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5584
United States


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 14, 2012, 03:55:17 pm »
Ignore

CO, OH, NM, PA, and IA are all Safe Obama.

NC, VA, GA, SC, FL, NH are all tossup.


So, the election is already won?  Thanks for letting us know.  Smiley

GA a tossup?
Logged

NVGonzalez
antwnzrr
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1753
Mexico


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: April 14, 2012, 06:23:10 pm »
Ignore



http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2012/04/14/us/politics/ap-us-road-to-270-glance.html?_r=2&hp

What I would change:

NM, MN, WI, MI -> Safe Obama

PA -> Tossup

GA, SC -> Lean Romney (but we need more polls from there, preferably from Mason-Dixon, PPP and SurveyUSA)

I'd add NV and NH as lean Obama and if another poll confirms it I'd put CO as lean too.
Logged




Bernie would probably win Vermont if Obama were deemed to have more than 272 evs in the vag.
Fuzzybigfoot
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4116
United States


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: April 14, 2012, 06:32:09 pm »
Ignore

Here's what I think it is:




Tongue
Logged
R2D2
20RP12
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 23786
Iceland


Political Matrix
E: -7.74, S: -7.48

View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 14, 2012, 06:58:04 pm »
Ignore

MO a tossup???
Logged


I'm a teenaged male. Everything is wrong with me.
ShadowOfTheWave
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1622
United States


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: April 14, 2012, 07:12:10 pm »
Ignore

I think if Obama was able to beat Hillary in MO, he'd have a decent shot of beating Romney, but only if he wins by the same or a larger margin.
Logged
Grad Students are the Worst
Alcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 29691
United States


View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 14, 2012, 07:15:43 pm »
Ignore

I think if Obama was able to beat Hillary in MO, he'd have a decent shot of beating Romney, but only if he wins by the same or a larger margin.



Something tells me that Obama's 2008 primary win wasn't on the back of swing voters.
Logged

n/c
"'Oeps!' De blunders van Rick Perry Indicted"
DarthNader
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 416


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 14, 2012, 07:18:25 pm »
Ignore

Current map:



Fall map:

Logged
ShadowOfTheWave
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1622
United States


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: April 14, 2012, 07:19:03 pm »
Ignore

I think if Obama was able to beat Hillary in MO, he'd have a decent shot of beating Romney, but only if he wins by the same or a larger margin.



Something tells me that Obama's 2008 primary win wasn't on the back of swing voters.

Yes, thank you for having the decency to admit that Obama won the primary because of reverse racism.
Logged
IDS Ex-Speaker Ben Kenobi
Ben Kenobi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2673
United States


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: April 14, 2012, 08:01:14 pm »
Ignore

Darth Nader, that looks about right, but everyone is actually understating Obama's strength.
Logged

"By not voting, you would let someone win who wants to destroy the regions, raise taxes, remove guns from the street, nationalize transit, expand abortion coverage, a gut the military." - Hagrid
nkpatel1279
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1718
United States


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 14, 2012, 10:48:29 pm »
Ignore

Obama-D wins all of the Dukakis states he carried last time including (IA-6,MN-10,and WI-10)=96ev
Obama-D wins all of the Gore/ Kerry states he carried by a double digit margin including (PA-20,NM-5,and MI-16)=253ev
Winning CO-9,NV-6,and NH-4 gives Obama-D 272ev.
Obama-D has a greater than 50-50 chance of winning VA-13,OH-18,and FL-29.
If Obama-D is having a great night on Election Day. He narrowly wins or loses NC-15 and MO-10.
2012 is going to be like 2000. The states Gore narrowly won in 2000 was IA-6,MN-10,NM-5,OR-7,and WI-10. Gore narrowly lost NH-4 which could have given him the 270plus ev.
The states Obama-D will win in 2012 by a very narrow margin is CO-9,IA-6,and NV-6. He wins MI-16,MN-10,NM-5,OR-7,PA-20,and WI-10 by a high single digit margin. (268ev) Obama-D will fight to win NH-4,OH-18,FL-29,and VA-13. Obama-D loses MO-10 and NC-15 by a narrow margin. Obama-D loses AZ-11,GA-16,and IN-11 by a high single digit margin.
Logged
asexual trans victimologist
Nathan
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13096


View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 14, 2012, 10:58:27 pm »
Ignore

I think if Obama was able to beat Hillary in MO, he'd have a decent shot of beating Romney, but only if he wins by the same or a larger margin.



Something tells me that Obama's 2008 primary win wasn't on the back of swing voters.

Yes, thank you for having the decency to admit that Obama won the primary because of reverse racism.

'Reverse racism' isn't a thing.

The 'urban vote', however, clearly is.
Logged

A shameless agrarian collectivist with no respect for private property or individual rights.

His idea of freedom is - it is a bad thing and should be stopped at all costs.

Nathan-land.  As much fun as watching paint dry... literally.
Pages: [1] 2 Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.20 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines