Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
June 26, 2017, 12:23:43 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Be sure to enable your "Ultimate Profile" for even more goodies on your profile page!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
| |-+  U.S. Presidential Election Results
| | |-+  2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results (Moderator: Torie)
| | | |-+  Clinton & McCain caucus performances
« previous next »
Pages: [1] Print
Author Topic: Clinton & McCain caucus performances  (Read 1117 times)

excelsus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 692
View Profile
« on: January 07, 2014, 02:23:21 pm »
Ignore

Why did Clinton and McCain perform so poorly in caucus states?
There was only one caucus each they won.
However, McCain only won Washington (and Puerto Rico) after every serious candidate had dropped out, and Clinton won Nevada, but even there she didn't receive a plurality of delegates.

Why do you think this is?



« Last Edit: January 07, 2014, 02:24:56 pm by excelsus »Logged

Cath
Cathcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19675
United States


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: January 07, 2014, 02:26:19 pm »
Ignore

I'm gonna guess that there's great grass roots involvement at the caucus level than in primaries, and those races tended to go more towards the candidates favored by the more ideological/anti-establishment end of the party.
Logged

"There is only one superpower in the world: Love."
-Martin O'Malley
BaconBacon96
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2686
Ireland, Republic of


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: January 07, 2014, 04:25:33 pm »
Ignore

I'm gonna guess that there's great grass roots involvement at the caucus level than in primaries, and those races tended to go more towards the candidates favored by the more ideological/anti-establishment end of the party.
I think this is absolutely correct.
Logged

On Chris Christie-
He can eat his opponets and achieve a unified field.

excelsus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 692
View Profile
« Reply #3 on: January 07, 2014, 04:32:34 pm »
Ignore

I'm gonna guess that there's great grass roots involvement at the caucus level than in primaries, and those races tended to go more towards the candidates favored by the more ideological/anti-establishment end of the party.
I think this is absolutely correct.

Okay, I understand why Obama could mobilize his grassroot supporters.
But why didn't McCain have any? I thought there were millions of supporters who had been eager for decades to vote for him.
Logged

Cath
Cathcon
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19675
United States


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: January 07, 2014, 04:40:36 pm »
Ignore

I'm gonna guess that there's great grass roots involvement at the caucus level than in primaries, and those races tended to go more towards the candidates favored by the more ideological/anti-establishment end of the party.
I think this is absolutely correct.

Okay, I understand why Obama could mobilize his grassroot supporters.
But why didn't McCain have any? I thought there were millions of supporters who had been eager for decades to vote for him.

Maybe, but not in the conservative Interior West, especially against the support 2008 Romney was apparently getting.
Logged

"There is only one superpower in the world: Love."
-Martin O'Malley
Pages: [1] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines