So... is Santorum next in line for 2016?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 12:50:56 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Election Archive
  Election Archive
  2016 U.S. Presidential Election
  So... is Santorum next in line for 2016?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: Will Santorum be the GOP nominee in 2016?
#1
Yes
 
#2
No
 
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results

Total Voters: 43

Author Topic: So... is Santorum next in line for 2016?  (Read 3519 times)
retromike22
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,452
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 15, 2012, 01:12:40 AM »

The next in line pattern in the Republican nomination seems to have continued into 2012. Will it work again in 2016?
Logged
CLARENCE 2015!
clarence
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,927
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 15, 2012, 02:14:29 AM »

He is making the right moves after exiting... visiting NRA, conference call with supporters, etc
Logged
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 53,696


Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 15, 2012, 02:24:38 AM »

Well, the only time it didn't happen with the modern primary system is when George W Bush stole Buchanan's turn.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 15, 2012, 06:11:49 AM »

Well, the only time it didn't happen with the modern primary system is when George W Bush stole Buchanan's turn.
'
Too bad. A Buchanan campaign would have been interesting to watch Wink
Logged
morgieb
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,634
Australia


Political Matrix
E: -7.87, S: -8.70

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: April 15, 2012, 08:39:06 AM »

As jfern said, Buchanan was the only non-next in line in the modern era, and Santorum has actually held elective office, but I can't see them nominating him.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: April 15, 2012, 09:04:57 AM »

As jfern said, Buchanan was the only non-next in line in the modern era, and Santorum has actually held elective office, but I can't see them nominating him.

Never underestimate the GOP electorate.

November 2012 (after Obama is projected to be reelected):

Oh no! It's because we nominated a moderate again! Sad Let's have a true conservative in 2016!
Logged
Lincoln Republican
Winfield
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 14,348


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: April 15, 2012, 09:19:24 AM »

No.

Santorum is too polarizing and too, well, wacky.
Logged
The world will shine with light in our nightmare
Just Passion Through
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 45,251
Norway


Political Matrix
E: -6.32, S: -7.48

P P P

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: April 15, 2012, 10:14:59 AM »

He'll still be young enough to run in 2016 and would already have half the base behind him at that time, so I'd say yes.
Logged
FEMA Camp Administrator
Cathcon
Atlas Star
*****
Posts: 27,298
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #8 on: April 15, 2012, 11:27:51 AM »

By 2016, he's been out of office for ten years and the last time he's won an actual election is frickin' 16 years ago. If he really is next in line, God help us.
Logged
MASHED POTATOES. VOTE!
Kalwejt
Atlas Institution
*****
Posts: 57,380


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #9 on: April 15, 2012, 11:40:10 AM »

No.

Santorum is too polarizing and too, well, wacky.

So, 2012 field was pathetic indeed: a choice between a polarizing wacko and a man with charisma of wet wiper.
Logged
ShadowRocket
cb48026
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,460


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #10 on: April 15, 2012, 12:54:32 PM »

He'll probably have a pretty good chance if he runs. Especially if the base really gets sucked into the "everytime we nominate a moderate, we lose" mindset, and Christie comes across as too much of a Romney redux.
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #11 on: April 15, 2012, 02:19:18 PM »

Good chance.
Logged
NHI
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 6,140


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #12 on: April 15, 2012, 02:25:44 PM »

No.

Santorum is too polarizing and too, well, wacky.

Agreed. If he is nominated, say hello to Pres. Clinton, Cuomo, Schweitzer or someone else.
Logged
Cobbler
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 914
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #13 on: April 15, 2012, 03:22:25 PM »

Santorum was a last resort this time. I don't think he'll be able to pull it off against other big conservative names.
Logged
Mr. Morden
Atlas Legend
*****
Posts: 44,073
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #14 on: April 15, 2012, 03:59:00 PM »

No, of course not.  Santorum is more like Buchanan than he is like Bush, Dole, McCain, Romney, etc., in that the party establishment doesn't like him, and will go with someone else.  Christie, Rubio, McDonnell, and Ryan are all far more likely to be nominated than him.
Logged
Bull Moose Base
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 3,488


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #15 on: April 15, 2012, 04:17:35 PM »

Iowa becomes more irrelevant for the GOP each cycle, Florida more influential.  Winning Florida might be diminished a bit if Rubio or Jeb had homefield advanatge but even so, that plus already being well-positioned to dominate the invisible primary...  One of the more interesting dynamics of 2016 is you have two legacies in Jeb and Hillary as speculated frontrunners and their proteges as two other speculated frontrunners in Rubio and Cuomo (Cuomo of Bill Clinton; Gillibrand is more of a Hillary protege).  I wonder if the symmetry could lead to bipartisan support for scrapping that fairly useless constitutional penalty on same-state running mates.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,731
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #16 on: April 15, 2012, 04:26:56 PM »

Eh, I hope Santorum's not the next in line. Could you imagine the embarrassment of a Clinton-Santorum match-up?

I know the focus was always "Mitt has a problem with the very conservative," but the opposite could be said of Santorum, and I think it's much more damaging: Santorum has a problem with moderates, Democrats, and liberals.

Personally, I would throw my full support behind Hillary if Santorum was the nominee. And I bet a lot of moderate Republicans would too. Hillary is a strong leader, and half the problem people have with Obama is that he's not. She'd be a force against meek little Santorum.
Logged
Cobbler
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 914
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #17 on: April 15, 2012, 06:19:34 PM »

Yeah, Santorum being the nominee would cause me to vote Democrat. He's just far too socially conservative for my tastes. And I think for most conservative Republicans he will look less attractive when he's not next to Mitt Romney.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #18 on: April 15, 2012, 06:34:20 PM »

Yeah, Santorum being the nominee would cause me to vote Democrat. He's just far too socially conservative for my tastes. And I think for most conservative Republicans he will look less attractive when he's not next to Mitt Romney.

Just thinking about a Santorum administration... Hey, HagridOfTheDeep, any room in Canada?
Logged
LastVoter
seatown
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,322
Thailand


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #19 on: April 16, 2012, 03:19:24 AM »

If Mitt Romney could be next in line, Santorum can be too, especially if he can hire someone to coach him how to say conservative things without being that controversial. Also a bag or two of money could help.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,731
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #20 on: April 16, 2012, 12:55:34 PM »

Yeah, Santorum being the nominee would cause me to vote Democrat. He's just far too socially conservative for my tastes. And I think for most conservative Republicans he will look less attractive when he's not next to Mitt Romney.

Just thinking about a Santorum administration... Hey, HagridOfTheDeep, any room in Canada?

Haha, you bet there is. But I can't see a libertarian lasting too long in Canada. Tongue
Logged
Miles
MilesC56
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 19,324
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #21 on: April 16, 2012, 02:13:11 PM »

Well, Romney's VP choice may be the GOP heir-apparent in 2016. I think Santorum is in a good position for 2016 though.
Logged
HagridOfTheDeep
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 8,731
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -6.19, S: -4.35

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #22 on: April 16, 2012, 04:05:40 PM »

Or the veep candidate will be the fake heir-apparent, ala Sarah Palin.

I guess that would rely on Romney making a controversial pick, which is sort of unlikely. Even Gov. Martinez or Sen. Rubio wouldn't be as controversial as Palin.
Logged
Donerail
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 15,345
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #23 on: April 16, 2012, 04:38:27 PM »

Yeah, Santorum being the nominee would cause me to vote Democrat. He's just far too socially conservative for my tastes. And I think for most conservative Republicans he will look less attractive when he's not next to Mitt Romney.

Just thinking about a Santorum administration... Hey, HagridOfTheDeep, any room in Canada?

Haha, you bet there is. But I can't see a libertarian lasting too long in Canada. Tongue

Even in Alberta or something?
Logged
Negusa Nagast 🚀
Nagas
Sr. Member
****
Posts: 2,826
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #24 on: April 16, 2012, 05:11:19 PM »

Well, Romney's VP choice may be the GOP heir-apparent in 2016. I think Santorum is in a good position for 2016 though.

This. If the VP is controversial to the base or forgoes a run, Santorum could easily be a top contender.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.051 seconds with 15 queries.