What scenario is the unlikeliest?
       |           

Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 16, 2024, 11:18:49 AM
News: Election Simulator 2.0 Released. Senate/Gubernatorial maps, proportional electoral votes, and more - Read more

  Talk Elections
  Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
  Presidential Election Trends (Moderator: 100% pro-life no matter what)
  What scenario is the unlikeliest?
« previous next »
Pages: [1]
Poll
Question: What scenario is the unlikeliest in terms of a presidential election?
#1
Vermont and Georgia vote for the same candidate.
#2
Virginia and Indiana vote for different candidates.
#3
Ohio and Missouri both vote for the losing candidate.
Show Pie Chart
Partisan results


Author Topic: What scenario is the unlikeliest?  (Read 1038 times)
diarrhea
Rookie
**
Posts: 26
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« on: April 16, 2012, 11:35:04 AM »

tough
Logged
tpfkaw
wormyguy
Junior Chimp
*****
Posts: 9,118
United States


Political Matrix
E: -0.58, S: 1.65

Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #1 on: April 16, 2012, 11:50:49 AM »

1, obviously.
Logged
diarrhea
Rookie
**
Posts: 26
Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #2 on: April 16, 2012, 12:06:09 PM »


But it happened quite often: 1840, 1848, 1972, 1984, 1988, 1992.

I'd say it's not likely to happen again in the near future, but it's not "obviously" unlikely, since Georgia has been trending blue.
Logged
Is Totally Not Feeblepizza.
Crackers
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 284
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #3 on: April 16, 2012, 12:14:45 PM »

In 2012? Option 1.
Logged
Oldiesfreak1854
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 13,674
United States


WWW Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #4 on: June 07, 2012, 06:04:25 PM »


But it happened quite often: 1840, 1848, 1972, 1984, 1988, 1992.

I'd say it's not likely to happen again in the near future, but it's not "obviously" unlikely, since Georgia has been trending blue.
Actually, Georgia has been trending red over the past few election cycles.
Logged
politicus
Atlas Icon
*****
Posts: 10,173
Denmark


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #5 on: June 08, 2012, 05:11:14 PM »

No. Vermont will vote D and the chance of Georgia going to the Dems in this election is extremely small. Both the other scenarios are unlikely, but not nearly as unlikely as that one.
Logged
Nichlemn
Jr. Member
***
Posts: 1,920


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #6 on: June 10, 2012, 12:43:17 AM »


But it happened quite often: 1840, 1848, 1972, 1984, 1988, 1992.

I'd say it's not likely to happen again in the near future, but it's not "obviously" unlikely, since Georgia has been trending blue.

#2 happened in 1824, 1836, 1840, 1848, 1860, (VA not voting in 1864/8) 1880, 1888, 1896, 1900, 1904, 1908, 1916, 1920, 1924, 1940, 1994, 1948. It hasn't happened recently, but it nearly did in 2008 and could easily do so this year.

#3 only happened in 1824 and 1848, which makes sense because voting together AND for the loser are quite stringent conditions, especially as Missouri has historically had a bit of a Democratic lean and Ohio a bit of Republican one. Now that they both have Republican leans, it's quite plausible. Obama could win without Ohio this year, which would likely have him lose Missouri too, satisfying the condition.
Logged
Mister Mets
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4,440
United States


Show only this user's posts in this thread
« Reply #7 on: June 10, 2012, 03:04:26 PM »

It's an interesting question.

I'll go with #1.

Ohio and Missouri are both more right-leaning than the rest of the country, so it's possible for the states to support a Republican candidate who loses a general election.

Virginia is the ultimate swing state. In 2008, it was closer to the national average than any other state. And it's been leaning more Democratic lately. Hell, in a close election it's possible for Obama to win Virginia, and lose the electoral college. It's something the Romney campaign has to consider in their strategy.

The least likely event is a candidate winning Vermont and Georgia. But Georgia's still in play for a Democrat during a major landslide. And we've all been spoiled by close elections in 2000 and 2004, so it's easy to forget that landslides are the norm.
Logged
Pages: [1]  
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Terms of Service - DMCA Agent and Policy - Privacy Policy and Cookies

Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines

Page created in 0.029 seconds with 14 queries.