Home
2012
Election Results
Election Info
Weblog
Wiki
Search
Email
Site Info
Store
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
Did you miss your
activation email?
June 20, 2013, 05:52:37 am
News:
Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!
Atlas Forum
General Politics
U.S. General Discussion
(Moderators:
Former Moderate
,
Badger
)
"Buffet Rule" fails
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: "Buffet Rule" fails (Read 1061 times)
Paul Kemp
YaBB God
Posts: 3808
"Buffet Rule" fails
«
on:
April 16, 2012, 06:23:39 pm »
Collins (ME) and Pryor (AR) were apparently the only two to cross party lines.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/16/buffett-rule-vote-fails-senate_n_1429657.html
Logged
Economic score: -3.48
Social score: -5.91
MilesC56
YaBB God
Posts: 8625
Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #1 on:
April 16, 2012, 06:49:31 pm »
Good for Collins. I'm disappointed in Pryor.
Logged
Governor Scott
Scott
YaBB God
Posts: 11537
Political Matrix
E: -2.19, S: -4.70
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #2 on:
April 16, 2012, 06:55:55 pm »
That 10% approval rating speaks for itself.
Brown's goin' down!
«
Last Edit: April 16, 2012, 07:10:36 pm by Senator Scott
»
Logged
Summary Of My Political Beliefs
Senator Snowstalker
Snowstalker
YaBB God
Posts: 11291
Political Matrix
E: -6.97, S: -2.96
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #3 on:
April 16, 2012, 07:08:56 pm »
We really need filibuster reform.
Logged
Democrats are out of power
Across that great wide ocean
Reagan's president elect
Fascist god in motion
Paul Kemp
YaBB God
Posts: 3808
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #4 on:
April 16, 2012, 07:27:41 pm »
Quote from: Snowstalker on April 16, 2012, 07:08:56 pm
We really need filibuster reform.
Would/Did you support such a thing during the judicial filibusters of the Bush years?
Logged
Economic score: -3.48
Social score: -5.91
Democratic Hawk
LucysBeau
YaBB God
Posts: 14739
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #5 on:
April 16, 2012, 07:31:14 pm »
Quote from: Snowstalker on April 16, 2012, 07:08:56 pm
We really need filibuster reform.
The Senate used to be an Honorable Body but the Republican Party hasn't always been as dangerous as it is nowadays, so keep the filibuster
Logged
Moderate Liberal Populist
[Personal 45%/Economic 42%] / Defense 'Hawk'
Registered in Georgia for Fantasy Politics
I Can't Get That Sound You Make, Out Of My Head
morgieb
YaBB God
Posts: 3054
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #6 on:
April 16, 2012, 07:42:20 pm »
Pryor, WAC.
Logged
greenforest32
YaBB God
Posts: 2253
Political Matrix
E: -7.94, S: -8.43
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #7 on:
April 16, 2012, 08:06:01 pm »
Gotta love that 3/5 supermajority requirement
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=2&vote=00065
Quote
Vote Counts:
YEAs 51
NAYs 45
Not Voting 4
Result: Rejected
Logged
Vosem
YaBB God
Posts: 3847
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #8 on:
April 16, 2012, 08:12:38 pm »
Quote from: greenforest32 on April 16, 2012, 08:06:01 pm
Gotta love that 3/5 supermajority requirement
http://www.senate.gov/legislative/LIS/roll_call_lists/roll_call_vote_cfm.cfm?congress=112&session=2&vote=00065
Quote
Vote Counts:
YEAs 51
NAYs 45
Not Voting 4
Result: Rejected
While I simultaneously agree and disagree with you in principle (to clarify, agree about the filibuster, disagree about the Buffet rule), it doesn't matter in this case, because the present composition of the House would not approve the Buffet rule if you threatened to poison them.
Logged
Quote from: pbrower2a on March 31, 2013, 11:56:27 am
Sometimes, reality has a corporatist-traditionalist bias. Sometimes it has a liberal bias.
Quote from: Vosem on January 12, 2013, 05:05:23 pm
Economic score: +4.84
Social score: -6.52
At this rate, I'll lean left economically within a year or so
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 21958
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #9 on:
April 16, 2012, 08:21:59 pm »
Given what would happen in the House anyway, this bill does not demonstrate what would happen if the filibuster would go away, as it ought to.
Logged
Quote from: Grumps on June 04, 2013, 12:14:06 pm
Is Dave Leip real?
Read
Fat Man on a Diet
, an alternate history in which atomic weapons have less bang.
shua
YaBB God
Posts: 7487
Political Matrix
E: 1.16, S: -4.00
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #10 on:
April 17, 2012, 12:44:15 am »
Did they even talk about the impact of raising capital gains taxes on the economy? If the debate just amounted to the stale soundbites of class interest politics as described in that article, that is truly depressing.
Logged
"Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. . . But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson
WV SBE v Barnette
http://tinyurl.com/bx359q5
○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└
jfern
YaBB God
Posts: 29274
Political Matrix
E: -7.38, S: -8.36
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #11 on:
April 17, 2012, 12:48:25 am »
The fillibuster must go.
Also Pryor needs a primary challenge. He's got no excuse. Even Ben Nelson voted for this.
Lieberman (who didn't bother to show up to vote) was opposed. Did anyone believe that crap about those who supported the primary challenge against him being one issue voters?
Scott Brown and Kirk aren't exactly moderates.
Logged
Wrecking Ball and Chain
BRTD
YaBB God
Posts: 68314
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #12 on:
April 17, 2012, 12:58:39 am »
Oh yeah Elizabeth Warren's going to get some campaign ads out of this.
Logged
Senator Napoleon
Napoleon
YaBB God
Posts: 11710
Political Matrix
E: -3.35, S: -8.17
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #13 on:
April 17, 2012, 01:30:42 am »
Quote from: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on April 17, 2012, 12:48:25 am
The fillibuster must go.
Also Pryor needs a primary challenge. He's got no excuse. Even Ben Nelson voted for this.
Lieberman (who didn't bother to show up to vote) was opposed. Did anyone believe that crap about those who supported the primary challenge against him being one issue voters?
Scott Brown and Kirk aren't exactly moderates.
Lieberman was a douche since he was first elected and Nelson will vote party line as he fades into retirement.
Logged
Quote from: Reaganfan on
Today
at 12:40:33 am
These girls look at me and see a redheaded Tuba-playing virgin. When in reality, I'm a redheaded guitar-playing womanizer.
MilesC56
YaBB God
Posts: 8625
Political Matrix
E: -1.03, S: 3.48
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #14 on:
April 17, 2012, 01:58:23 am »
Quote from: ○∙◄☻¥tπ[╪AV┼cVê└ on April 17, 2012, 12:48:25 am
Also Pryor needs a primary challenge. He's got no excuse. Even Ben Nelson voted for this.
I can forgive Pryor. I understand why he voted that way;
he's trying to avoid this.
Its hard to imagine a Pryor losing in Arkansas, but he doesn't have as favorable an electorate as his father did.
Maybe Halter should run against him!
Logged
Vosem
YaBB God
Posts: 3847
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #15 on:
April 17, 2012, 05:49:09 am »
Quote from: blood red X's for every 24 hours ive suffered through on April 17, 2012, 12:58:39 am
Oh yeah Elizabeth Warren's going to get some campaign ads out of this.
True, unfortunately. In a better world Scott Brown would get to use this in his advertisements ("Look! I opposed the Buffet Rule and Warren supports it! Vote for me!"), but Massachusetts politics doesn't quite work that way...with hope,
yet.
Logged
Quote from: pbrower2a on March 31, 2013, 11:56:27 am
Sometimes, reality has a corporatist-traditionalist bias. Sometimes it has a liberal bias.
Quote from: Vosem on January 12, 2013, 05:05:23 pm
Economic score: +4.84
Social score: -6.52
At this rate, I'll lean left economically within a year or so
IDS Legislator Alfred F. Jones
Alfred F. Jones
YaBB God
Posts: 5794
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #16 on:
April 17, 2012, 05:31:54 pm »
Quote from: Vosem on April 17, 2012, 05:49:09 am
Quote from: blood red X's for every 24 hours ive suffered through on April 17, 2012, 12:58:39 am
Oh yeah Elizabeth Warren's going to get some campaign ads out of this.
True, unfortunately. In a better world Scott Brown would get to use this in his advertisements ("Look! I opposed the Buffet Rule and Warren supports it! Vote for me!"), but Massachusetts politics doesn't quite work that way...with hope,
yet.
Wait, what? In what world would running on opposition to a popular idea be good?
Logged
Quote from: HagridOfTheDeep on August 01, 2012, 06:47:37 pm
I know you're reasonable, Alfred.
Quote from: Jbrase on June 06, 2013, 01:47:19 am
Don't let us get in the way of KILLING WITH FIRE the Roscoe Whatever Kill Rich People Act.
19:12 pkemp FF Alfred
Kuu ülevaade olulisematest
Xahar
YaBB God
Posts: 37014
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #17 on:
April 17, 2012, 05:37:42 pm »
Quote from: Senator Alfred F. Jones on April 17, 2012, 05:31:54 pm
Quote from: Vosem on April 17, 2012, 05:49:09 am
Quote from: blood red X's for every 24 hours ive suffered through on April 17, 2012, 12:58:39 am
Oh yeah Elizabeth Warren's going to get some campaign ads out of this.
True, unfortunately. In a better world Scott Brown would get to use this in his advertisements ("Look! I opposed the Buffet Rule and Warren supports it! Vote for me!"), but Massachusetts politics doesn't quite work that way...with hope,
yet.
Wait, what? In what world would running on opposition to a popular idea be good?
A world where total subservience to moneyed interests would be considered a positive good, presumably.
Logged
Quote from: Sibboleth on February 28, 2009, 04:08:37 pm
I'm not sure if this new tendency to appeal to the apparent inherent evil of Xahar in all things even remotely related to forum policing or this damn game is especially helpful.
Oakvale
oakvale
YaBB God
Posts: 6379
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #18 on:
April 17, 2012, 05:40:57 pm »
Quote from: Χahar on April 17, 2012, 05:37:42 pm
Quote from: Senator Alfred F. Jones on April 17, 2012, 05:31:54 pm
Quote from: Vosem on April 17, 2012, 05:49:09 am
Quote from: blood red X's for every 24 hours ive suffered through on April 17, 2012, 12:58:39 am
Oh yeah Elizabeth Warren's going to get some campaign ads out of this.
True, unfortunately. In a better world Scott Brown would get to use this in his advertisements ("Look! I opposed the Buffet Rule and Warren supports it! Vote for me!"), but Massachusetts politics doesn't quite work that way...with hope,
yet.
Wait, what? In what world would running on opposition to a popular idea be good?
A world where total subservience to moneyed interests would be considered a positive good, presumably.
The way the idea of taxing the extraordinarily wealthy seems to upset some people (who presumably wouldn't be impacted by the tax) always amazes me.
Logged
krazen1211
YaBB God
Posts: 5163
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #19 on:
April 17, 2012, 06:26:18 pm »
Of Course the Buffett Rule failed. We tried it already; its called the Alternative Minimum Tax.
Logged
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderators
YaBB God
Posts: 21958
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #20 on:
April 17, 2012, 07:44:01 pm »
Quote from: Senator Alfred F. Jones on April 17, 2012, 05:31:54 pm
Quote from: Vosem on April 17, 2012, 05:49:09 am
Quote from: blood red X's for every 24 hours ive suffered through on April 17, 2012, 12:58:39 am
Oh yeah Elizabeth Warren's going to get some campaign ads out of this.
True, unfortunately. In a better world Scott Brown would get to use this in his advertisements ("Look! I opposed the Buffet Rule and Warren supports it! Vote for me!"), but Massachusetts politics doesn't quite work that way...with hope,
yet.
Wait, what? In what world would running on opposition to a popular idea be good?
I suspect that in Vosem's "better world", the Buffet Rule would not be so popular. The Buffett Rule is a gimmick first and foremost. Rather than enacting an alternative Alternative Minimum Tax, we need to simplify the tax code.
Logged
Quote from: Grumps on June 04, 2013, 12:14:06 pm
Is Dave Leip real?
Read
Fat Man on a Diet
, an alternate history in which atomic weapons have less bang.
Vosem
YaBB God
Posts: 3847
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #21 on:
April 17, 2012, 08:11:53 pm »
Quote from: Senator Alfred F. Jones on April 17, 2012, 05:31:54 pm
Quote from: Vosem on April 17, 2012, 05:49:09 am
Quote from: blood red X's for every 24 hours ive suffered through on April 17, 2012, 12:58:39 am
Oh yeah Elizabeth Warren's going to get some campaign ads out of this.
True, unfortunately. In a better world Scott Brown would get to use this in his advertisements ("Look! I opposed the Buffet Rule and Warren supports it! Vote for me!"), but Massachusetts politics doesn't quite work that way...with hope,
yet.
Wait, what? In what world would running on opposition to a popular idea be good?
Haha, sorry. I meant that in a better world the Buffet Rule would be quite unpopular.
Logged
Quote from: pbrower2a on March 31, 2013, 11:56:27 am
Sometimes, reality has a corporatist-traditionalist bias. Sometimes it has a liberal bias.
Quote from: Vosem on January 12, 2013, 05:05:23 pm
Economic score: +4.84
Social score: -6.52
At this rate, I'll lean left economically within a year or so
shua
YaBB God
Posts: 7487
Political Matrix
E: 1.16, S: -4.00
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #22 on:
April 18, 2012, 09:52:30 am »
anyone know of a good summary of what parts of the tax law this would have changed? I'm a bit confused about it.
Logged
"Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. . . But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson
WV SBE v Barnette
http://tinyurl.com/bx359q5
King
intermoderate
YaBB God
Posts: 22421
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #23 on:
April 18, 2012, 12:58:39 pm »
Still, a poll showing 51% of millionaires approve of their taxes being raised is quite impressive even if the sample size is so low.
Logged
© Tweed the Younger
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
Posts: 34381
Re: "Buffet Rule" fails
«
Reply #24 on:
April 18, 2012, 01:20:35 pm »
no worries, should be at the top of Gov Christie's platform.
Logged
"If the Constitution means anything, it surely means that the president does not have unreviewable authority to summarily execute any American whom he concludes is an enemy of the state"
registered somewhere in Georgia AFE
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Presidential Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2016 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Results
===> 2000 U.S. Presidential Election Results
=> Presidential Election Trends
=> Election What-ifs?
===> Past Election What-ifs (US)
===> Alternative Elections
===> International What-ifs
-----------------------------
Other Elections - Analysis and Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Gubernatorial/Statewide Elections
===> 2013 & Odd Year Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2014 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> Congressional Elections
===> 2014 Senatorial Election Polls
=> International Elections
=> Election Predictions
-----------------------------
Questions and Answers
-----------------------------
=> Presidential Election Process
===> Electoral Reform
===> Polling
=> The Atlas
===> How To
-----------------------------
General Discussion
-----------------------------
=> Constitution and Law
=> Religion & Philosophy
=> History
===> Alternative History
-----------------------------
General Politics
-----------------------------
=> U.S. General Discussion
=> Political Geography & Demographics
=> International General Discussion
=> Economics
=> Individual Politics
=> Political Debate
===> Political Essays & Deliberation
===> Book Reviews and Discussion
-----------------------------
Election Archive
-----------------------------
=> 2012 Elections
===> 2012 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2012 House Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
===> 2012 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2012 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2010 Elections
===> 2010 House Election Polls
===> 2010 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2010 Gubernatorial Election Polls
=> 2008 Elections
===> 2008 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 Gubernatorial Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential General Election Polls
===> 2008 U.S. Presidential Primary Election Polls
=> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Campaign
===> 2004 U.S. Presidential Election Polls
=> 2006 Elections
===> 2006 Senatorial Election Polls
===> 2006 Gubernatorial Election Polls
-----------------------------
Forum Community
-----------------------------
=> Forum Community
===> Forum Community Election Match-ups
=> Election and History Games
===> Mock Parliment
===> Town Hall
===> Survivor
===> Interactive Timelines
=> Off-topic Board
-----------------------------
Atlas Fantasy Elections
-----------------------------
=> Atlas Fantasy Elections
===> Voting Booth
=> Atlas Fantasy Government
===> Constitutional Convention
===> Regional Governments
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Powered by SMF 1.1.18
|
SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Loading...