Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 25, 2013, 03:03:37 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Cast your ballot in the 2012 Mock Election!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Politics
| |-+  U.S. General Discussion (Moderators: Former Moderate, Badger)
| | |-+  "Buffet Rule" fails
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Author Topic: "Buffet Rule" fails  (Read 1050 times)
ShadowOfTheWave
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 1156
United States


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: April 18, 2012, 02:52:34 pm »
Ignore

Fantastic. This is an anti-capitalist proposal, and would not be good for the economy. Attacking the upper class will not save the lower class. If the upper class thrives, there will be jobs and more economic opportunity for all.
Logged
Governor Scott
Scott
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 11145
United States


Political Matrix
E: -2.97, S: -5.22

View Profile
« Reply #26 on: April 18, 2012, 02:54:33 pm »
Ignore

Fantastic. This is an anti-capitalist proposal, and would not be good for the economy. Attacking the upper class will not save the lower class. If the upper class thrives, there will be jobs and more economic opportunity for all.

Logged

Purch
Full Member
***
Posts: 196


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: April 19, 2012, 08:01:40 am »
Ignore

Fantastic. This is an anti-capitalist proposal, and would not be good for the economy. Attacking the upper class will not save the lower class. If the upper class thrives, there will be jobs and more economic opportunity for all.

Pure trickle down economics doesn't work.

But the idea that just taxing the rich will solve our economic problems when no one has given a serious proposal to how they'd balance the budget  and reduce the debt with the additional revenue is naive. Everyone wants to give the goverment more money when they've shown they arley make efficent investments with that money.
Logged

Those gravestones don't say democrat or republican those gravestones say American.
perdedor
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2536
United States


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 19, 2012, 10:06:15 am »
Ignore

We really need filibuster reform.

This. It's time for the nuclear option, even though Republicans may benefit from it at some point.
Logged
Joe Republic
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 28526
United States


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: April 19, 2012, 04:51:07 pm »
Ignore

http://www.thedailyshow.com/watch/tue-april-17-2012/the-great-buffett-caper

Remember, $47,000,000,000 in extra revenue from millionaires is a barely significant sum of money.  But, $300,000,000 in spending for breast cancer screenings and birth control is waaaaay too much money.
Logged

shua
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 7283
Colombia


Political Matrix
E: 1.16, S: -4.00

View Profile WWW
« Reply #30 on: April 19, 2012, 06:53:57 pm »
Ignore

The key issue is how much the tax will raise in comparison to how much of a drag it will be on the economy.
Logged

"Those who begin coercive elimination of dissent soon find themselves exterminating dissenters. Compulsory unification of opinion achieves only the unanimity of the graveyard. . . But freedom to differ is not limited to things that do not matter much. That would be a mere shadow of freedom. The test of its substance is the right to differ as to things that touch the heart of the existing order."
- Justice Robert Jackson WV SBE v Barnette

http://tinyurl.com/bx359q5
OC
olawakandi
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8399
United States


View Profile
« Reply #31 on: April 24, 2012, 01:47:34 pm »
Ignore

The only way to resolve this is for the Dems to get the House back and King cross party lines and attach it to a reconcillation bill if it is a 49-49 Dem controlled senate.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.18 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines
Forums Directory