If me and jmfcst agree on something, do you tend to agree as well?

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I've noticed that few do when this is the case.

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

will you please go back to focusing on opebo

[Lief 🗽]

Don't you two both agree that a magical man in the sky impregnated a virgin and their son came back to life a few days after being crucified?

[CLARENCE 2015!]

BRTD- the fat behind
The chair- every one else's patience

[Okay, maybe Mike Johnson is a competent parliamentarian.]

No because it's often low-church theology that I don't agree with or like (you agree on memorialism, for instance). I think the equivalent question for more liturgical types would be if me and TJ agree on something... et cetera, or maybe me and Simfan if Simfan talked about religion more.

[Grumpier Than Thou]

No.

[Simfan34]

You must be logged in to read this quote.

If jmfcst and I agree on something, do you tend to agree as well? !!!!!!

[TJ in Oregon]

No because it's often low-church theology that I don't agree with or like (you agree on memorialism, for instance). I think the equivalent question for more liturgical types would be if me and TJ agree on something... et cetera, or maybe me and Simfan if Simfan talked about religion more.

^^^

This was my thought as well. I was assuming it would be some sort of Evangelical theological idea. If I could add a further stipulation to me the 'No' even more likely, if BRTD and jmfcst agree and Nathan disagrees then it's probably close to certain I also disagree. It's also safe to assume we have completely transcended the political spectrum by that point.

[courts]

Ihre Grammatik tut mir weh.

[Simfan34]

Ihre Grammatik tut mir weh.

I was preparing something similar as you typed.

Sincerely,

Simfan34
Ausdrucksweisenführer und Grammatikführer der NSDAP

No because it's often low-church theology that I don't agree with or like (you agree on memorialism, for instance). I think the equivalent question for more liturgical types would be if me and TJ agree on something... et cetera, or maybe me and Simfan if Simfan talked about religion more.

I can talk about religion more.

[Yelnoc]

BRTD- the fat behind
The chair- every one else's patience

This sums up his entire posting history quite well.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

I wasn't thinking of theology stuff guys. I was thinking about things like critiques of other's tastes in women, and criticism of the moderation system here, it's not like me and him agree on much theologically anyway....

Though admittedly when we do I think most non-believers would likely agree, such as for example memorialism which is the default view any non-Christian would take of communion, or if either said something like that the Pope or some bishop has no authority...

[Simfan34]

Examples? Especially the women.

[I spent the winter writing songs about getting better]

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=152632.0

[Swing low, sweet chariot. Comin' for to carry me home.]

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=152632.0

thank you for clarifying that we only agree on the trivial.  The thought of us agreeing on something deep was giving me the willies.

[So rightwing that I broke the Political Compass!]

https://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=152632.0

thank you for clarifying that we only agree on the trivial.  The thought of us agreeing on something deep was giving me the willies.

So which of you favours nuking Philadelphia?