Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
April 18, 2014, 01:20:54 pm
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Atlas Hardware Upgrade complete October 13, 2013.

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  Forum Community
| |-+  Off-topic Board (Moderators: Torie, Assemblyman & Queen Mum Inks.LWC, The Mikado)
| | |-+  Eating dogs
« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Print
Poll
Question: Is it OK to eat dog meat?
Yes   -22 (45.8%)
Yes, but only if you are in country where its normal   -10 (20.8%)
No - only hotdogs   -12 (25%)
Other (specify)   -2 (4.2%)
Dunno   -2 (4.2%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 48

Author Topic: Eating dogs  (Read 2384 times)
Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13223


View Profile
« Reply #50 on: April 28, 2012, 05:22:45 pm »
Ignore


I also really don't care about the supposed logical inconsistency between eating other animals and not dog.  That's the reason why I am an American and part of American culture thought.  Tough sh!t.

Why do you think anyone cares about what you think?
Logged
Strategos Autokrator
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5545


View Profile
« Reply #51 on: April 28, 2012, 06:58:44 pm »
Ignore

What does dog taste like anyway?
Logged

opebo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 47647


View Profile
« Reply #52 on: April 28, 2012, 08:47:46 pm »
Ignore

What does dog taste like anyway?

Its been years, but I remember it being delicious, though strong and gamey.  But then I like everything.
Logged

The essence of democracy at its purest is a lynch mob

Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19679
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00


View Profile WWW
« Reply #53 on: April 28, 2012, 09:40:14 pm »
Ignore

No. It goes against the sacred covenant we have with the canine species. We have coexisted for thousands of years, and they have been domesticated. They are "man's best friend". Some cultures have gone astray from this covenant, but that doesn't make eating them okay. Pigs are just as smart as dogs of course, but no covenant exists with them. They have been bred for food. Dogs have not.

I also like the inefficient argument. Why eat another carnivore (actually, aren't dogs omnivores?)

Sacred covenant?

Well, something I believe anyways. There is a special relationship between dogs and humans. Something that has existed for millenia, and something that cannot be denied.
Logged

http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com

Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
IDS Attorney General PiT
PiT (The Physicist)
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 22338
United States


View Profile
« Reply #54 on: April 29, 2012, 01:33:56 am »
Ignore

     I don't do it, but I don't really care if other people do it.
Logged

farewell
Lewis Trondheim
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 58527
India


View Profile
« Reply #55 on: April 29, 2012, 03:43:27 am »
Ignore

I'd be more interested in trying cat sometime (no, this is not a sexual reference.)

Ugh, now that is a meat that I can't imagine tasting anything other than wholly disgusting.
Somewhat similar to rabbit, by all accounts.
Logged

I may conceivably reconsider.

Knowing me it's more likely than not.
Strategos Autokrator
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5545


View Profile
« Reply #56 on: April 29, 2012, 04:11:37 am »
Ignore

No. It goes against the sacred covenant we have with the canine species. We have coexisted for thousands of years, and they have been domesticated. They are "man's best friend". Some cultures have gone astray from this covenant, but that doesn't make eating them okay. Pigs are just as smart as dogs of course, but no covenant exists with them. They have been bred for food. Dogs have not.

I also like the inefficient argument. Why eat another carnivore (actually, aren't dogs omnivores?)

Sacred covenant?

Well, something I believe anyways. There is a special relationship between dogs and humans. Something that has existed for millenia, and something that cannot be denied.

Seems like pigs were getting the shaft convenant-wise.
Logged

dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 20885
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #57 on: April 29, 2012, 06:47:00 am »
Ignore

I think it's sheep that get the shaft, or at least that's what the ____insert nationality or state of choice here____ tell us.
Logged

Quote from:   Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
Vosem
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 4876
United States


View Profile
« Reply #58 on: April 29, 2012, 08:28:20 am »
Ignore

Of course -- it would be a better use for them that what Americans use them for nowadays. Hopefully this practice gains more currency in the US of A.
Logged
opebo
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 47647


View Profile
« Reply #59 on: April 29, 2012, 09:48:14 am »
Ignore

...pigs were getting the shaft

Now that I believe is illegal, n'est-ce pas?  Funny old world.
Logged

The essence of democracy at its purest is a lynch mob

Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19679
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00


View Profile WWW
« Reply #60 on: April 29, 2012, 02:28:04 pm »
Ignore

No. It goes against the sacred covenant we have with the canine species. We have coexisted for thousands of years, and they have been domesticated. They are "man's best friend". Some cultures have gone astray from this covenant, but that doesn't make eating them okay. Pigs are just as smart as dogs of course, but no covenant exists with them. They have been bred for food. Dogs have not.

I also like the inefficient argument. Why eat another carnivore (actually, aren't dogs omnivores?)

Sacred covenant?

Well, something I believe anyways. There is a special relationship between dogs and humans. Something that has existed for millenia, and something that cannot be denied.

Seems like pigs were getting the shaft convenant-wise.

Well, as smart as pigs are, what good have they done for humans besides being very tasty?
Logged

http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com

Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
Strategos Autokrator
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5545


View Profile
« Reply #61 on: April 29, 2012, 04:22:38 pm »
Ignore

No. It goes against the sacred covenant we have with the canine species. We have coexisted for thousands of years, and they have been domesticated. They are "man's best friend". Some cultures have gone astray from this covenant, but that doesn't make eating them okay. Pigs are just as smart as dogs of course, but no covenant exists with them. They have been bred for food. Dogs have not.

I also like the inefficient argument. Why eat another carnivore (actually, aren't dogs omnivores?)

Sacred covenant?

Well, something I believe anyways. There is a special relationship between dogs and humans. Something that has existed for millenia, and something that cannot be denied.

Seems like pigs were getting the shaft convenant-wise.

Well, as smart as pigs are, what good have they done for humans besides being very tasty?

http://old.post-gazette.com/neigh_west/20020409lulu0409p1.asp
Logged

politicus
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 3176
Denmark


View Profile
« Reply #62 on: April 29, 2012, 04:35:47 pm »
Ignore

A true heroine!
Logged

"An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile, hoping it will eat him last."

Winston Churchill

"While I am a great believer in the free enterprise system and all that it entails, I am an even stronger believer in the right of our people to live in a clean and pollution-free environment."

Barry Goldwater

The way 90% of Atlas threads end up:
The Mikado
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14205


View Profile
« Reply #63 on: April 29, 2012, 08:48:49 pm »

No. It goes against the sacred covenant we have with the canine species. We have coexisted for thousands of years, and they have been domesticated. They are "man's best friend". Some cultures have gone astray from this covenant, but that doesn't make eating them okay. Pigs are just as smart as dogs of course, but no covenant exists with them. They have been bred for food. Dogs have not.

I also like the inefficient argument. Why eat another carnivore (actually, aren't dogs omnivores?)

Sacred covenant?

Well, something I believe anyways. There is a special relationship between dogs and humans. Something that has existed for millenia, and something that cannot be denied.

Seems like pigs were getting the shaft convenant-wise.

Well, as smart as pigs are, what good have they done for humans besides being very tasty?

Finding truffles?  Acting as walking compost heaps and eating our garbage?

Anyway, the "compact" point is pretty moot, given the widespread practice of eating horseflesh (an animal with an even closer bond to humans than dogs).
Logged

It is very advisable to examine and dissect the men of science for once, since they for their part are quite accustomed to laying bold hands on everything in the world, even the most venerable things, and taking them to pieces.

-Friedrich Nietzsche
Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19679
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00


View Profile WWW
« Reply #64 on: April 30, 2012, 11:07:37 am »
Ignore

No. It goes against the sacred covenant we have with the canine species. We have coexisted for thousands of years, and they have been domesticated. They are "man's best friend". Some cultures have gone astray from this covenant, but that doesn't make eating them okay. Pigs are just as smart as dogs of course, but no covenant exists with them. They have been bred for food. Dogs have not.

I also like the inefficient argument. Why eat another carnivore (actually, aren't dogs omnivores?)

Sacred covenant?

Well, something I believe anyways. There is a special relationship between dogs and humans. Something that has existed for millenia, and something that cannot be denied.

Seems like pigs were getting the shaft convenant-wise.

Well, as smart as pigs are, what good have they done for humans besides being very tasty?

(an animal with an even closer bond to humans than dogs).

Debatable, but perhaps the same argument could be used against eating horse. At least horses are strictly herbivores.

So, where do we draw the line? Is eating chimpanzee ok?
Logged

http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com

Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
Strategos Autokrator
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5545


View Profile
« Reply #65 on: April 30, 2012, 11:29:24 am »
Ignore

No. It goes against the sacred covenant we have with the canine species. We have coexisted for thousands of years, and they have been domesticated. They are "man's best friend". Some cultures have gone astray from this covenant, but that doesn't make eating them okay. Pigs are just as smart as dogs of course, but no covenant exists with them. They have been bred for food. Dogs have not.

I also like the inefficient argument. Why eat another carnivore (actually, aren't dogs omnivores?)

Sacred covenant?

Well, something I believe anyways. There is a special relationship between dogs and humans. Something that has existed for millenia, and something that cannot be denied.

Seems like pigs were getting the shaft convenant-wise.

Well, as smart as pigs are, what good have they done for humans besides being very tasty?

(an animal with an even closer bond to humans than dogs).

Debatable, but perhaps the same argument could be used against eating horse. At least horses are strictly herbivores.

So, where do we draw the line? Is eating chimpanzee ok?

Nope. First of all, chimpanzees are an endangered species (well, two species actually). Some people may also consider it semi-cannibalism.

None of the two points apply to dogs.
« Last Edit: April 30, 2012, 12:20:08 pm by General Buck Turgidson »Logged

Lіef
Lief
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 30908
Czech Republic


View Profile
« Reply #66 on: April 30, 2012, 11:39:34 am »
Ignore

We draw the line nowhere. We are human beings and it is our evolutionary right to eat whatever lesser specie we want whenever we want to.
Logged

RIP opebo
RIP the jfmtsc
RIP joshgreen
RIP King

Don't get me wrong, I love variety, and get a kick out of all these odors.
Eraserhead
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 37899
United States


View Profile
« Reply #67 on: May 01, 2012, 03:27:20 am »
Ignore

We draw the line nowhere. We are human beings and it is our evolutionary right to eat whatever lesser specie we want whenever we want to.

Indeed. And while we're at it, why stop at "lesser species"? There are "lesser humans" we should be eating too. We'll start with the retarded and disabled people first.
Logged

Hatman
EarlAW
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 19679
Canada


Political Matrix
E: -4.97, S: -6.00


View Profile WWW
« Reply #68 on: May 01, 2012, 08:47:33 am »
Ignore

I bet neanderthals were tasty.
Logged

http://canadianelectionatlas.blogspot.com

Follow me on Twitter @EarlWashburn
Sbane
sbane
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 13223


View Profile
« Reply #69 on: May 01, 2012, 04:32:34 pm »
Ignore

Haha wow, please justify why you would eat an animal that gives you milk to feed your children or helps till your field for free? Why not draw the line before that, hmm? What does a dog provide that is of more value than a cow. You guys are being absolutely ridiculous making these comparisons to monkeys or neanderthals.
Logged
Strategos Autokrator
Old Europe
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 5545


View Profile
« Reply #70 on: May 01, 2012, 05:55:03 pm »
Ignore

After having googled around a bit, I must say that the topic of dog consumption is not that uninteresting as an aspect of our own cultural history.

Up until the early 20th century eating dogs was not that uncommon in the Western world, especially some parts of Europe. For instance, this New York Times article from 1907 reported that a total of 3700 dogs had been slaughtered for the purposes of human consumption in the German state of Saxony during the year 1906. Advertisement for dog meat in German newspapers was also described as "not uncommon":
http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?_r=1&res=9B04E4D9133EE033A25750C2A9609C946697D6CF&oref=slogin

While the consumption of dogs was often the result of famine, shortages or at least an increase in prices for other meat, it also managed to become more of a tradition in some regions. In fact, eating dogs still seems to be occasionally practiced in some rural parts of Switzerland to this day.

Ironically, the emergence of the more and more "industrialized" breeding and slaughtering of cows, pigs etc. meant that these forms of meat were finally constantly available at low prices for every consumer. Hence dog meat became less and less viable/necessary as a food  alternative and the taboo against eating dogs started to assert itself.
« Last Edit: May 01, 2012, 05:59:10 pm by Kommandant der Reichsflugscheibe Walküre II »Logged

Pages: 1 2 [3] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines