One question: why on earth would Robert Byrd (in the Senate since the '50's and still there...) be Zell Miller's (in the Senate since 2000. And no longer there) V.P?
First you have the seniority problem (yes, Byrd would see it like that) and then you have the fact that Byrd has always been fairly anti-Republican, something that can't really be said for Zell at the moment.
There's also some "fairly" large ideological differences between the two... on social issues I'd guess their views are similer, but economically?
The reason I put Byrd on the ticket is he is fairly socially Conservative and would probably have appeal to socially Conservative Southern Republicans (along with Zell obviously) who would be turned off by having 2 socially liberal candidatees running on the Republican ticket. Basically I was trying to come up with something that would be an inverse of what we have now. Chaffe & Specter are the 2 most liberal Republicans out now