Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
July 29, 2014, 05:43:23 am
HomePredMockPollEVCalcAFEWIKIHelpLogin Register
News: Don't forget to get your 2013 Gubernatorial Endorsements and Predictions in!

+  Atlas Forum
|-+  General Discussion
| |-+  History (Moderator: True Federalist)
| | |-+  Greatest military leader in history
« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Print
Poll
Question: Who was the best military leader?
Zhukov   -0 (0%)
Alexander the Great   -4 (16%)
Attila the Hun   -0 (0%)
Napoleon Bonaparte   -4 (16%)
Robert E. Lee   -3 (12%)
Rommel   -1 (4%)
Ghengis Khan   -5 (20%)
Joan of Arc   -0 (0%)
Saladin   -0 (0%)
Hannibal   -1 (4%)
Julius Caesar   -1 (4%)
Other   -6 (24%)
Show Pie Chart
Total Voters: 25

Author Topic: Greatest military leader in history  (Read 2631 times)
Jerseyrules
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 2436
United States


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: March 28, 2012, 07:09:27 pm »
Ignore

dead0man- I agree with your analysis of Lee...McClellan and Burnside gave him glory thru their failures

Just out of curiousity, and I hope this doesn't derail the thread, but had Lee commanded the Army, would Dixie would've gone down sooner or later?  And who was the best man for the job?  Fremont?  Grant from day one?  Or keep Scott?  Or something else?  I'm sorry but I just wanted to know your opinions.
Logged

Drink Too Much:
http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=147022.0

Skyrim now, Skyrim tomorrow, Morrowind Forever!

An Empire of Stars and Stripes:

http://uselectionatlas.org/FORUM/index.php?topic=156974.0

Quote
FOOL!  I AM Cathcon!

Endorsements:
Governor: Brown (CA), Corbett (PA), Scott (FL)
House: Emken (CA)
Other: Rob McCoy (CA Assembly)
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27831
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #26 on: March 28, 2012, 10:09:05 pm »

dead0man- I agree with your analysis of Lee...McClellan and Burnside gave him glory thru their failures

Just out of curiousity, and I hope this doesn't derail the thread, but had Lee commanded the Army, would Dixie would've gone down sooner or later?  And who was the best man for the job?  Fremont?  Grant from day one?  Or keep Scott?  Or something else?  I'm sorry but I just wanted to know your opinions.

Had Lee stayed with the Union then like McDowell he would have roundly pilloried after losing Bull Run, so McClellan still ends up being promoted to Maj. Gen. first and placed in charge of the Army of the Potomac.  As the ranking brigadier, Lee gets command of I Corps of the Army of the Potomac when Lincoln becomes impatient and appoints corps commanders for McClellan based on seniority.  As such Lee is likely in charge of the III Corps of the Army of Virginia when Cedar Mountain is fought.

If Lee is bold enough to take the objective of Gordonsville when he learns that Banks and Jackson are fighting again near Cedar Mountain (and if the terrain permits such a move which I am not certain of) then perhaps Halleck does not order Pope to go on the defensive after Cedar Mountain.  Such a result is even more likely since there likely is no Seven Days Battles if Lee in not commanding the Army of Northern Virgina.  Hence Pope can close in on Richmond from the north and either the Army of Northern Virginia retreats from Richmond or Richmond falls to a siege that autumn.

If Halleck orders the Army of Virgina to take a defensive stance after Cedar Mountain anyway what happens next is cloudy.  With no Seven Days to drive the Army of the Potomac to Berkeley Plantation, I can't see Longstreet being sent north to join Jackson in an attack on the Army of Virginia.  There are enough butterflies possible at this point that any number of alternate histories could written with this as the starting point.

However, what is common to both forks of what happens after Cedar Mountain is that unless the Union forces in the east have a major collapse at some point or Lee is sent out west, it is doubtful that Lee rises any higher than Corps command after being removed from command of the Army of Northeastern Virginia after the Battle of Bull Run.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
The Mikado
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 14387


View Profile
« Reply #27 on: March 29, 2012, 05:12:35 pm »
Ignore


Kalid ibn Al-Walid

Khalid is my pick.  His undefeated military record coupled with the scope of his success is rivaled only by Alexander.
Logged

Einzige is a poltroon who cowardly turns down duel challenges he should be honor-bound to accept. The Code Duello authorizes you to mock and belittle such a pathetic honorless scoundrel.
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21600
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #28 on: March 29, 2012, 11:50:48 pm »
Ignore

....and greatly surpassed by Genghis.
Logged

Quote from:   Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
tweed
Miamiu1027
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 35399
United States


Political Matrix
E: -8.52, S: -8.00

View Profile
« Reply #29 on: April 07, 2012, 12:54:36 pm »
Ignore

Mao
Logged
dead0man
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 21600
United States


Political Matrix
E: 6.84, S: -4.52

View Profile
« Reply #30 on: April 07, 2012, 01:14:25 pm »
Ignore

Being excellent at killing poor farmers doesn't make one a great military leader.
Logged

Quote from:   Martha Gellhorn for The Atlantic 1961
The unique misfortune of the Palestinian refugees is that they are a weapon in what seems to be a permanent war...today, in the Middle East, you get a repeated sinking sensation about the Palestinian refugees: they are only a beginning, not an end. Their function is to hang around and be constantly useful as a goad. The ultimate aim is not such humane small potatoes as repatriating refugees.
True Federalist
Ernest
Moderator
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 27831
United States


View Profile WWW
« Reply #31 on: April 07, 2012, 06:58:53 pm »

Zhu De and Lin Biao were probably the best senior military leaders that the Chinese Communists had.
Logged

I wonder why Van Heusen never bothered to make women's clothing?
Beet
Moderators
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 15798


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: April 30, 2012, 02:18:22 am »
Ignore

No Tweed is right... Mao didn't become superior to Zhu De and Lin Biao due to his superior civilian and administrative skills.

But my vote is for Khalid ibn al-Walid.
Logged
Iron King SJoyce
sjoycefla
YaBB God
*****
Posts: 8787
United States


View Profile
« Reply #33 on: April 30, 2012, 07:56:43 am »
Ignore

Subutai, hands down. Conquered more territory than any other general in history.
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  


Login with username, password and session length

Logout

Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2013, Simple Machines